Amelia Earhart left a lasting
legacy in the sense that her achievements inspired a new generation of pilots that were women.
A- legacy in the sense that her achievements inspired a new generation of pilots that were women.
in the sense that seems wordy
that were women but no longer are women? Maybe that's the intended meaning, but it does seem odd
B- legacy, inspiring a new generation of pilots that were women.
–ing words can modify many things and (I believe)
inspiring is modifying the entire clause before the comma. This is less wordy than
in the sense thatC- legacy when her achievements inspired a new generation of women pilots
This reads like a single moment in time (when john crossed the road). This conflicts with
lasting legacyD- legacy, for her achievements inspired a new generation of women to become pilots.
This is great. We no longer are led to believe that they were women but are now not.
Lasting legacy is logically sensible with
a new generationE- legacy by her achievements inspiring a new generation of pilots who were women
Some problem with
were women