Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 23:00 It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 23:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,831
Own Kudos:
14,407
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,831
Kudos: 14,407
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Puranjaysapra
Joined: 03 May 2025
Last visit: 31 Aug 2026
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 220 Q60 V59
WE:Consulting (Finance)
Products:
GMAT 1: 220 Q60 V59
Posts: 19
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
forestmayank
Joined: 05 Nov 2025
Last visit: 26 Aug 2026
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 103
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
1111fate
Joined: 19 Oct 2021
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,221
Location: India
Posts: 96
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
wouldn't conifers be more than spruces hence their ratio will be less than 1 despite of not knowing total of conifers we do know it is greater than spruces ?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,179
Own Kudos:
839,620
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111,357
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,179
Kudos: 839,620
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1111fate
wouldn't conifers be more than spruces hence their ratio will be less than 1 despite of not knowing total of conifers we do know it is greater than spruces ?
No.

To select a valid pair, the ratio must be numerically determined, not just known to be less than 1.

It’s true that Conifers > Spruces, so Spruces/Conifers is less than 1. But we do not know how many cedars and other conifers there are, so we cannot compute the exact ratio.

Since the problem requires that the ratio “can be determined,” simply knowing it’s less than 1 is not enough.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,179
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,357
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,179
Kudos: 839,620
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
forestmayank
Conifer = 32%
Deciduous can be maximum ~68% (let it be 68%)
1/8 are Maple = ~8.5%
20% of Maple are Japanese Maple = ~1.7%

We are sure that conifers are 32% and Japanese Maple can be max 1.7%, so why it may not be Japanese Maple and Conifers?
We are not sure of deciduous also, it can be anywhere between a little more than 34% to almost 68%.

Can someone pls explain?
Your calculation shows only a maximum. That’s the issue.

Conifers are fixed at 32% of all trees.

Japanese maples are 20% of maples, and maples are 1/8 of deciduous, so Japanese maples = 1/5 * 1/8 of deciduous = 1/40 of deciduous.

But deciduous is not fixed as a percent of all trees. It can be anywhere from just over 34% up to 68%. So Japanese maples as a percent of all trees can be anywhere from just over 34%/40 to 68%/40, i.e. just over 0.85% up to 1.7%.

Therefore Japanese maples/Conifers is not a single value. It could be just over 0.85/32 or it could be 1.7/32 or anything in between. The problem requires the ratio to be determinable (one exact number), not just bounded.
User avatar
1111fate
Joined: 19 Oct 2021
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,221
Location: India
Posts: 96
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks Bunuel It's clear now :)
User avatar
MrMaxMan
Joined: 13 Jul 2026
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 66
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Want to find a ratio that can be found using the answers provided and is less than 1.
I think it's easier to look at the options and eliminate obvious ones that use language like "most" and "some" because it will eliminate the host group as an option.

The two answers that give exact ratios are the maples-to-deciduous which =1/8 and the Japanese maple-to-deciduous which is 1/5.
The question wants to us to tell it the proper ratio and since the Japanese maples are a sub group of deciduous, they obviously are less than the deciduous group as a whole.
A:B=A/B<1, A= Japanese maple, B= Deciduous
parkhydel
­An inventory of a neighborhood's trees found that 32 percent were conifers and most of the rest were deciduous. Among the conifers were 258 spruces and 112 pines, along with some cedars and other species. Most of the deciduous trees were oaks, but one in eight was a maple. Of the oaks, 65 percent were red oaks and 25 percent were white oaks. Of the maples, 20 percent were Japanese maples.

Select for A and for B two types of trees such that the ratio of the number of trees of the type selected for A to the number of trees of the type selected for B can be determined and is less than 1. Make only two selections, one in each column.­
   1   2 
Moderators:
Math Expert
113179 posts
DI Forum Moderator
409 posts