Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:42 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
parkhydel
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
20,385
 [89]
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 273
Kudos: 20,385
 [89]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
84
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,883
 [20]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,883
 [20]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,982
 [8]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,982
 [8]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,696
 [7]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,696
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Again a great question. can be done in exactly 30 seconds if understood well.­

The question wants us to find a ratio that is determinable, so let us see each statement. Working on options directly would be a faster way.

­An inventory of a neighborhood's trees found that 32 percent were conifers and most of the rest were deciduous.
We can just say that deciduous are anything greater than (100-32)/2 or >34 and \(\leq 100-32\)
Thus, no ratios can be found between conifers or its subpart and deciduous or its parts.

Among the conifers were 258 spruces and 112 pines, along with some cedars and other species.
We can find ratio between spruces and pines but nothing with total conifers or any other of its subparts.

Most of the deciduous trees were oaks, but one in eight was a maple.
Again use of 'most' restricts anyratio between deciduous and oaks or its sub parts. However ratio between deciduous and maple is given as 8:1.

Of the oaks, 65 percent were red oaks and 25 percent were white oaks. Of the maples, 20 percent were Japanese maples.
Ratio between Red oaks and white oaks is given but this cannot be connected to any other parts.
Also, Ratio between Japenese maples and total maples is given as 1:5

The ratios known are given in bold above
between spruces and pines.......  Spruce is given in option but pine is not.
between deciduous and maple......  Deciduous is given but maple is not
between Red oaks and white oaks..... Red Oaks is given but White oaks is not given in the option
between Japenese maples and total maples....... Japenese maples is given but total maples is not given in the option

However, deciduous is related to maples, which is further related to japenese maples.
D:M = 8:1 and J:M = 1:5
D:M = 8:1 = 40:5 and J:M = 1:5. Hence D:M:J = 40:5:1 or D:J = 40:1
 
User avatar
Elite097
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u why cant it be japanese/conifers?
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,696
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Japanese maples were 20% of maples, which were 1/8 of oaks, so Japanese maples = 1/5 * 1/8 * x, where x is number of deciduous trees.
Next conifer are 32% of total, so t* 32/100

But do we have a relation between t and x?
No, had the trees been only deciduous and conifers, then x would be t*68/100, and we would get a relation between Japanese maples and conifers. But most of the rest are deciduous does not give the exact percentage of deciduous. 40% or 50% or 60% would give different answers every time.
User avatar
qingyuuu
Joined: 27 Mar 2024
Last visit: 22 Jul 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why can't we choose A: Cedar & B:Conifer? The number of Cedar is less than Conifer.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,982
 [5]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,982
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
qingyuuu
Why can't we choose A: Cedar & B:Conifer? The number of Cedar is less than Conifer.
 
Question stem: Select for A and for B two types of trees such that the ratio of the number of trees of the type selected for A to the number of trees of the type selected for B can be determined and is less than 1

We need to be able to "determine" the ratio which means we need its exact value. We don't know how many cedars there are. The ratio will be less than 1 but what will it be exactly, we cannot say.

We can only determine the ratio of Japanese maples to Deciduous trees in the given options. 

­
User avatar
johnpepe
Joined: 12 Jul 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why cant I choose A: japanese maple B: Red oaks? Since the ratio of oak and maple was known,red oaks contain 65% of total oak. Please tell me why I am wrong, thank.
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,696
 [1]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,696
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
johnpepe
Why cant I choose A: japanese maple B: Red oaks? Since the ratio of oak and maple was known,red oaks contain 65% of total oak. Please tell me why I am wrong, thank.
­Red oaks are related numerically to Oaks, but oaks is not linked to Deciduous. We just know most deciduous are oaks, but numerically or a ratio..NO.
Further, JM is linked to maples , which is further linked to deciduous.

But, Oaks and Maples are not linked anywhere.­ The ration between JM and RO may be less than 1, but the exact ratio cannot be determined.
User avatar
thelastskybender
Joined: 26 Dec 2022
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 132
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
johnpepe
Why cant I choose A: japanese maple B: Red oaks? Since the ratio of oak and maple was known,red oaks contain 65% of total oak. Please tell me why I am wrong, thank.
­The ratio is surely less than one but it can't be determined.
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 491
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 491
Kudos: 426
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­32%: Conifers   
   258 Spruces
   112 Pines
   Cedars
   Others species

Most of the rest: Decidious
   Most: Oaks       
        65%: Red
        25%: White
   1/8: Maples
        20%: Japanese

==> We only know the ratio of Japanese maples to Decidious trees

Ratio = 20% * \( \frac{1}{8} \)  < 1

­
User avatar
DonBosco7
Joined: 03 Mar 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Products:
Posts: 81
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conifers = 32% of ALL TREES = 258 spruce + 112 pines + some cedars & others
Deciduous = 68% of ALL TRESS
Oaks > 50% of Deciduous (i.e. 50% of 68% of ALL TREES)
Maple = 1/8 of Deciduous = 12.5% of Deciduous = 12.5% of 68% of ALL TREES
Red Oaks = 65% of oaks
White Oaks = 25% of oaks
Japanese Maples = 20% of Maples = 20% of 12.5% of 68% of ALL TRESS

From the above data if we take some numerical figure for ALL TRESS we can say confidently that we can determine A & B and A < B only for Deciduous trees and Japanese Maple, because all the others are unknown quantity and cannot be determined.

A = Japanese Maple
B = Deciduous trees
User avatar
anushkatew
Joined: 05 Nov 2024
Last visit: 29 Sep 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 490
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q79 V84 DI77
GMAT Focus 2: 715 Q85 V89 DI82
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 715 Q85 V89 DI82
Posts: 17
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
why can't we choose a) conifers and b) deciduous ??
User avatar
cheshire
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 26 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Sep 2025
Posts: 271
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 271
Kudos: 256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Because we do not know the exact number of deciduous and cannot create a ratio.
anushkatew
why can't we choose a) conifers and b) deciduous ??
User avatar
Julioo
Joined: 19 Nov 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 429
Posts: 6
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Got it right, but took me about 6 minutes. :( Thank you for your explanation.
chetan2u
Again a great question. can be done in exactly 30 seconds if understood well.­

The question wants us to find a ratio that is determinable, so let us see each statement. Working on options directly would be a faster way.

­An inventory of a neighborhood's trees found that 32 percent were conifers and most of the rest were deciduous.
We can just say that deciduous are anything greater than (100-32)/2 or >34 and \(\leq 100-32\)
Thus, no ratios can be found between conifers or its subpart and deciduous or its parts.

Among the conifers were 258 spruces and 112 pines, along with some cedars and other species.
We can find ratio between spruces and pines but nothing with total conifers or any other of its subparts.

Most of the deciduous trees were oaks, but one in eight was a maple.
Again use of 'most' restricts anyratio between deciduous and oaks or its sub parts. However ratio between deciduous and maple is given as 8:1.

Of the oaks, 65 percent were red oaks and 25 percent were white oaks. Of the maples, 20 percent were Japanese maples.
Ratio between Red oaks and white oaks is given but this cannot be connected to any other parts.
Also, Ratio between Japenese maples and total maples is given as 1:5

The ratios known are given in bold above
between spruces and pines....... Spruce is given in option but pine is not.
between deciduous and maple...... Deciduous is given but maple is not
between Red oaks and white oaks..... Red Oaks is given but White oaks is not given in the option
between Japenese maples and total maples....... Japenese maples is given but total maples is not given in the option

However, deciduous is related to maples, which is further related to japenese maples.
D:M = 8:1 and J:M = 1:5
D:M = 8:1 = 40:5 and J:M = 1:5. Hence D:M:J = 40:5:1 or D:J = 40:1
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts