Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 16
Schools: Stanford, HBS, INSEAD

Anthony and Michael sit on the sixmember board of directors [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Nov 2009, 17:28
2
This post received KUDOS
19
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
39% (02:16) correct
61% (01:32) wrong based on 258 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please repost it in the respective forum. Anthony and Michael sit on the six member board od directors for compnay X. If the board is to be split up into 2 threeperson subcommittees, what percent of all the possible subcommittees that include Michael also include Anthony? A. 20% B. 30% C. 40% D. 50% E. 60% OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: anthonyandmichaelsitonthesixmemberboardofdirectors102027.html
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Last edited by Bunuel on 15 Jul 2013, 14:11, edited 2 times in total.
OA added.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39753

Re: Subcommittee [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2009, 07:20
6
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
6
This post was BOOKMARKED
Anthony and Michael sit on the six member board od directors for compnay X. If the board is to be split up into 2 threeperson subcommittees, what percent of all the possible subcommittees that include Michael also include Anthony?A. 20% B. 30% C. 40% D. 50% E. 60% First approach:Let's take the group with Michael: there is a place for two other members and one of them should be taken by Anthony, as there are total of 5 people left, hence there is probability of 2/5=40%. Second approach:Again in Michael's group 2 places are left, # of selections of 2 out of 5 5C2=10  total # of outcomes. Select Anthony  1C1=1, select any third member out of 4  4C1=4, total # =1C1*4C1=4  total # of winning outcomes. P=# of winning outcomes/# of outcomes=4/10=40% Third approach:Michael's group: Select Anthony as a second member out of 5  1/5 and any other as a third one out of 4 left 4/4, total=1/5*4/4=1/5; Select any member but Anthony as second member out of 5  4/5 and Anthony as a third out of 4 left 1/4, total=4/5*1/4=1/5; Sum=1/5+1/5=2/5=40% Fourth approach:Total # of splitting group of 6 into two groups of 3: 6C3*3C3/2!=10 # of groups with Michael and Anthony: 1C1*1C1*4C1=4 P=4/10=40% Answer: C. Hope it helps.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 3: 740 Q40 V50 GMAT 4: 700 Q48 V38 GMAT 5: 710 Q45 V41 GMAT 6: 680 Q47 V36 GMAT 9: 740 Q49 V42 GMAT 11: 500 Q47 V33 GMAT 14: 760 Q49 V44
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)

Re: Subcommittee [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2009, 07:47
bunuel, it will be more helpful if u can explain the fourth approach in detail



Senior Manager
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 300

Re: Subcommittee [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2009, 07:50
Bunuel  the fourth approach you posted seems to have an error: Fourth approach: Total # of splitting group of 6 into two groups of 3: 6C3*3C3/2!=10 # of groups with Michael and Anthony: 1C1*1C1*4C1=4 P=4/10=40% Total # of splitting group of 6 into two groups of 3: should be 6C3*3C3=20 and not 10. Out of these 20 , there are 10 groups with Michael in it so answer = groups with michael and anthony/ total groups with michael = 4/10 = 40%
_________________
Thanks, Sri  keep uppp...ing the tempo...
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39753

Re: Subcommittee [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2009, 09:18
srini123 wrote: Bunuel  the fourth approach you posted seems to have an error:
Fourth approach: Total # of splitting group of 6 into two groups of 3: 6C3*3C3/2!=10 # of groups with Michael and Anthony: 1C1*1C1*4C1=4 P=4/10=40%
Total # of splitting group of 6 into two groups of 3: should be 6C3*3C3=20 and not 10. Out of these 20 , there are 10 groups with Michael in it
so answer = groups with michael and anthony/ total groups with michael = 4/10 = 40% Do we have group #1 and #2? Does it matter in which group Michael and Anthony will be? If no we should divide 6C3*3C3 by 2! and get 10 different split ups of 6 to groups of 3 when order of groups doesn't matter. # of groups with Michael and Anthony together: 1C1*1C1*4C1=4 P=4/10=40%. The number of ways in which mn different items can be divided equally into m groups, each containing n objects and the order of the groups is not important is \(\frac{(mn)!}{(n!)^m*m!}\). \(\frac{6!}{(3!)^2*2!}=10\) OR another way: In our case \(\frac{6C3*3C3}{2!}=10.\)
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Senior Manager
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 300

Re: Subcommittee [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2009, 13:35
1
This post received KUDOS
Bunuel wrote: srini123 wrote: Bunuel  the fourth approach you posted seems to have an error:
Fourth approach: Total # of splitting group of 6 into two groups of 3: 6C3*3C3/2!=10 # of groups with Michael and Anthony: 1C1*1C1*4C1=4 P=4/10=40%
Total # of splitting group of 6 into two groups of 3: should be 6C3*3C3=20 and not 10. Out of these 20 , there are 10 groups with Michael in it
so answer = groups with michael and anthony/ total groups with michael = 4/10 = 40% Do we have group #1 and #2? Does it matter in which group Michael and Anthony will be? If no we should divide 6C3*3C3 by 2! and get 10 different split ups of 6 to groups of 3 when order of groups doesn't matter. # of groups with Michael and Anthony together: 1C1*1C1*4C1=4 P=4/10=40%. The number of ways in which mn different items can be divided equally into m groups, each containing n objects and the order of the groups is not important is \(\frac{(mn)!}{(n!)^m*m!}\). \(\frac{6!}{(3!)^2*2!}=10\) OR another way: In our case \(\frac{6C3*3C3}{2!}=10.\) Sorry I may be missing something but, if we want to split 6 persons into 2 groups of 3 where order doesn't matter. dont we have 20 groups ? for eg., let A,B,C,D,E,F be 6 people and the groups with 3 people in each will be as below ABC, ABD, ABE, ABF, ACD, ACE, ACF, ADE, ADF, AEF  10 BCD, BCE,BCE, BDE,BDF, BEF  6 CDE, CDE,CEF 3 DEF 1 total 20. Let A be michael for this question , then total groups we have with michael is 10 and 4 groups have Michael and Anthony (assume D=anthony) im sorry im still not getting why 20 is not the total groups irrespective of michael in it or not
_________________
Thanks, Sri  keep uppp...ing the tempo...
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39753

Re: Subcommittee [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2009, 14:04
srini123 wrote: Sorry I may be missing something but, if we want to split 6 persons into 2 groups of 3 where order doesn't matter. dont we have 20 groups ? for eg., let A,B,C,D,E,F be 6 people and the groups with 3 people in each will be as below
ABC, ABD, ABE, ABF, ACD, ACE, ACF, ADE, ADF, AEF  10 BCD, BCE,BCE, BDE,BDF, BEF  6 CDE, CDE,CEF 3 DEF 1
total 20.
Let A be michael for this question , then total groups we have with michael is 10 and 4 groups have Michael and Anthony (assume D=anthony)
im sorry im still not getting why 20 is not the total groups irrespective of michael in it or not Now I see what you've meant. But I think it's not quite true and here is where you are making the mistake: you listed # of selections of three out of 6  6C3=20. This is different from splitting the group into TWO groups of three members each: 1. ABC  DEF 2. ABD  CEF 3. ABE  CDF 4. ABF  CDE 5. ACD  BEF 6. ACE  BDF 7. ACF  BDE 8. ADE  BCF 9. ADF  BCE 10. AEF  BCD So, here are all possible ways to split 6 people into two groups of three members each. Let's say Anthony is A and Michael is B. You can see that there are only 4 scenarios when A and B are in one group (1,2,3,4). Hence 4/10.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Senior Manager
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 300

Re: Subcommittee [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2009, 14:10
Bunuel wrote: srini123 wrote: Sorry I may be missing something but, if we want to split 6 persons into 2 groups of 3 where order doesn't matter. dont we have 20 groups ? for eg., let A,B,C,D,E,F be 6 people and the groups with 3 people in each will be as below
ABC, ABD, ABE, ABF, ACD, ACE, ACF, ADE, ADF, AEF  10 BCD, BCE,BCE, BDE,BDF, BEF  6 CDE, CDE,CEF 3 DEF 1
total 20.
Let A be michael for this question , then total groups we have with michael is 10 and 4 groups have Michael and Anthony (assume D=anthony)
im sorry im still not getting why 20 is not the total groups irrespective of michael in it or not Now I see what you've meant. But I think it's not quite true and here is where you are making the mistake: you listed # of selections of three out of 6  6C3=20. This is different from splitting the group into TWO groups of three members each: 1. ABC  DEF 2. ABD  CEF 3. ABE  CDF 4. ABF  CDE 5. ACD  BEF 6. ACE  BDF 7. ACF  BDE 8. ADE  BCF 9. ADF  BCE 10. AEF  BCD So, here are all possible ways to split 6 people into two groups of three members each. Let's say Anthony is A and Michael is B. You can see that there are only 4 scenarios when A and B are in one group (1,2,3,4). Hence 4/10. Ok great, thanks Bunuel now I see splitting group of 6 into 2 groups with 3 in each is different from forming groups of 3 people into 2 groups from 6 people. Thanks much
_________________
Thanks, Sri  keep uppp...ing the tempo...
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip



Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 195
Schools: ABCD

Re: Subcommittee [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2012, 09:41
Bunuel wrote: arora2m wrote: Anthony and Michael sit on the sixmember board of directors for company X. If the board is to be split up into 2 threeperson subcommittees, what percent of all the possible subcommittees that include Michael also include Anthony? 1. 20% 2. 30% 3. 40% 4. 50% 5. 60% Let's take the group with Michael: there is a place for two other members and one of them should be taken by Anthony, as there are total of 5 people left, hence there is probability of 2/5=40%. Bunuel, Can you please help with the above approach? I was able to understand the three other approaches outlined by you. Thanks



Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2012
Posts: 10
Location: United Kingdom
WE: Business Development (Investment Banking)

Re: Subcommittee [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Oct 2012, 10:00
voodoochild wrote: Bunuel wrote: arora2m wrote: Anthony and Michael sit on the sixmember board of directors for company X. If the board is to be split up into 2 threeperson subcommittees, what percent of all the possible subcommittees that include Michael also include Anthony? 1. 20% 2. 30% 3. 40% 4. 50% 5. 60% Let's take the group with Michael: there is a place for two other members and one of them should be taken by Anthony, as there are total of 5 people left, hence there is probability of 2/5=40%. Bunuel, Can you please help with the above approach? I was able to understand the three other approaches outlined by you. Thanks I didn't get this explanation straight away too. I think the rationale is the following: Mike's probability to be in the subc A is 50% or 3/6, or 1/2. Anthony's probability to get into subc A is 2/5 or 40%. Probability that both of them are in subc A is (1/2)*(2/5)=1/5. Same applies to the subc B, hence 1/5*2= 2/5 or 40%.



SVP
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2085
Location: New York, NY

Re: Anthony and Michael sit on the sixmember board of directors [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2012, 14:45
Here's some clarification for those who are still confused.
First group of 6
     
Gets broken into 2 subcommittees of 3 each:
     
We know Michael is already in one of them:
M     
We just need to fill in one of those two slots next to Michael with an "A" for Anthony.
So we already know Mike is in that slot and that there are 5 remaining choices.
Well, how many ways can we pick Anthony such that he ends up in Michael's group?
Keep in mind that order matters  meaning Michael in the 1st slot is counted separately from Michael in the 2nd slot, etc.
so we can multiply a line of nCr formulas:
[ (Out of 1 available Michael, pick that 1 Anthony for that 2nd spot) * (Out of the remaining 4, choose any 1 for that 3rd spot) ] =  (Out of the initial 5 remaining people, choose 2 to fill up the 2nd and 3rd slots)
= [ (1C1) * (4C1) ] / (5C2)
= 4 / 10
= 40%
Hope that helps.



Intern
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 33
Concentration: Leadership, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 2: 660 Q48 V33 GMAT 3: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.74

Re: Subcommittee [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2013, 01:43
Bunuel wrote: srini123 wrote: Sorry I may be missing something but, if we want to split 6 persons into 2 groups of 3 where order doesn't matter. dont we have 20 groups ? for eg., let A,B,C,D,E,F be 6 people and the groups with 3 people in each will be as below
ABC, ABD, ABE, ABF, ACD, ACE, ACF, ADE, ADF, AEF  10 BCD, BCE,BCE, BDE,BDF, BEF  6 CDE, CDE,CEF 3 DEF 1
total 20.
Let A be michael for this question , then total groups we have with michael is 10 and 4 groups have Michael and Anthony (assume D=anthony)
im sorry im still not getting why 20 is not the total groups irrespective of michael in it or not Now I see what you've meant. But I think it's not quite true and here is where you are making the mistake: you listed # of selections of three out of 6  6C3=20. This is different from splitting the group into TWO groups of three members each: 1. ABC  DEF 2. ABD  CEF 3. ABE  CDF 4. ABF  CDE 5. ACD  BEF 6. ACE  BDF 7. ACF  BDE 8. ADE  BCF 9. ADF  BCE 10. AEF  BCD So, here are all possible ways to split 6 people into two groups of three members each. Let's say Anthony is A and Michael is B. You can see that there are only 4 scenarios when A and B are in one group (1,2,3,4). Hence 4/10. I see what you mean now. What confused me about the fourth approach is that we are dividing the # of groups with Anthony, Michael and someone else BY # of different splitups of 2 subcommittees (i understand why this is 10). I don't see how that's an apples to apples comparison? However, I can see it now that you've listed it out. I think it doesnt matter because if we want Anthony and Michael to be together they can only be in 4 split ups anyway?











