GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Oct 2018, 18:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Posts: 36
Location: Kuwait
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V32
GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V40
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 16 Nov 2017, 23:42
1
1
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

83% (01:55) correct 17% (02:31) wrong based on 304 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking anti-psychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking anti-psychotic medicines during the same period.

Lucy: But the use of anti-psychotic drugs by adults is considered normal at the current rate of 11 adults per 1,000 taking the drugs. In contrast, the number of children on anti-psychotic medication last year was 6.6 per 1,000 children.

Lucy's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

A) The current level of anti-psychotic drug use among children is extremely high

B) The fact that number of children taking anti-psychotic drugs increased 73% over the last 4 years is not an indication that the current level of use is abnormally high

C) If only 6.6 of every 1000 children are taking an anti psychotic medicine, the increase in the use of such medicines cannot be the percentage that Antoine cites

D) It is unlikely that the increase in the use of anti-psychotic medicines by children will continue at the same rate

E) If the number of children taking anti-psychotoc drugs is given as a certain number, the actual rate of such drug use is even higher

P.S The question stem is similar to another on MGMAT, but differs subtly; kindly do not delete. Also, please note that OA is unavailable.

_________________

Completing MBA applications is like fighting a pissed off hydra on steroids, lop off one head and two more just take their place


Originally posted by varunchand on 06 Jun 2015, 12:07.
Last edited by Bunuel on 16 Nov 2017, 23:42, edited 1 time in total.
Added the OA.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 144
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2015, 13:31
2
This is an inference question, because we are given a series of premises and then asked to draw a conclusion.

Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking anti-psychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking anti-psychotic medicines during the same period.

Lucy: But the use of anti-psychotic drugs by adults is considered normal at the current rate of 11 adults per 1,000 taking the drugs. In contrast, the number of children on anti-psychotic medication last year was 6.6 per 1,000 children.

Lucy's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

A) The current level of anti-psychotic drug use among children is extremely high
Lucy if anything is implying the opposite, by indicating that the current level of children utilizing the drugs is far less than the normal adult level

B) The fact that number of children taking anti-psychotic drugs increased 73% over the last 4 years is not an indication that the current level of use is abnormally high
This nails it and is thus correct. Lucy is pointing out in response to Antoine's concern about the increase in drug use by children that just because it has increased by a high percentage does not mean that the absolute number is currently high. Be careful with absolute number vs. percent data. If you start with a small number and then increase it by a large percentage, you may still have a relatively small number.

C) If only 6.6 of every 1000 children are taking an anti psychotic medicine, the increase in the use of such medicines cannot be the percentage that Antoine cites
Lucy never says anything to hint that she disagrees with Antoine's evidence

D)It is unlikely that the increase in the use of anti-psychotic medicines by children will continue at the same rate
No mention of the future is given or implied

E) If the number of children taking anti-psychotoc drugs is given as a certain number, the actual rate of such drug use is even higher
Lucy never states or implies that the statistics are inaccurate

I hope this helps!
_________________

Brandon
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

If you found this post helpful, please give me kudos!!! :)

Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 76
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2015, 07:12
between B and C;

B) The fact that number of children taking anti-psychotic drugs increased 73% over the last 4 years is not an indication that the current level of use is abnormally high
This hits the assumption thus stating it as the conclusion. Hence, correct

C) If only 6.6 of every 1000 children are taking an anti psychotic medicine, the increase in the use of such medicines cannot be the percentage that Antoine cites.
on calculating mathematically, it can be found that the no. of children who were taking these drugs 4(x+0.73x=6.6; x=3.8) years back was around 4 and in these 4 years the number changed from 4 to 6.6, which does suggest that the increase in the use of such medicines CAN be the percentage antoine cites.(assuming that the change was calculated per 1000 child patients.) hence, incorrect.
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6956
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2015, 07:37
varunchand wrote:
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking anti-psychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking anti-psychotic medicines during the same period.

Lucy: But the use of anti-psychotic drugs by adults is considered normal at the current rate of 11 adults per 1,000 taking the drugs. In contrast, the number of children on anti-psychotic medication last year was 6.6 per 1,000 children.

Lucy's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

A) The current level of anti-psychotic drug use among children is extremely high

B) The fact that number of children taking anti-psychotic drugs increased 73% over the last 4 years is not an indication that the current level of use is abnormally high

C) If only 6.6 of every 1000 children are taking an anti psychotic medicine, the increase in the use of such medicines cannot be the percentage that Antoine cites

D)It is unlikely that the increase in the use of anti-psychotic medicines by children will continue at the same rate

E) If the number of children taking anti-psychotoc drugs is given as a certain number, the actual rate of such drug use is even higher

P.S The question stem is similar to another on MGMAT, but differs subtly; kindly do not delete. Also, please note that OA is unavailable.


Hi,
i feel the statement of Antoine itself is not very clear..
He compares increase in percentage of one group to increase in pure number , even if he meant otherwise..Although one may argue that "that" stands for the number `but i dont think it is clear..
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking anti-psychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking anti-psychotic medicines during the same period.

hello VeritasPrepBrandon..
how can we compare two different groups and infer usage of a younger group from an accepted normal rate in adults....
It may be that even 6.6 could be a high number for this group looking at the age bracket because Lucy very clearly speaks of 11 as normal for adults and keeps 19 yrs and below out of it..
_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html


GMAT online Tutor

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2086
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2017, 13:02
2
1
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking antipsychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking antipsychotic medicines during the same period.
Lucy: But the use of antipsychotic drugs by adults is considered normal at the current rate of 11 adults per 1,000 taking the drugs. In contrast, the number of children on antipsychotic medication last year was 6.6 per 1,000 children. Lucy’s argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

A.The current level of antipsychotic drug use in children is abnormally high.
B.The fact that the number of children taking antipsychotic medicines increased 73 percent over the last four years is not an indication that the current level of use is abnormally high.
C.If only 6.6 out of every 1,000 children are taking an antipsychotic medication, the increase in the use of such medicines cannot be the percentage Antoine cites.
D. It is unlikely that the increase in the use of antipsychotic medicines by children will continue at the same rate.
E. If the number of children taking antipsychotic drugs is given as a certain number, the actual rate of such drug use is even higher.
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Jul 2016
Posts: 14
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2017, 20:47
A: actually supports antoine's claim but not Lucy's
B: Close to the way Lucy has answered
C: can't be verified
D: out of scope
E: out of scope

IMO B
SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1694
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Retail)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2017, 21:02
Antoine --> AP drug consumption by children below 19 years increased by 73% in last 4 years.

Lucy --> Normal consumption is 110/10000. Last year consumption = 66/10000 .

Question: Lucy’s argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

A.The current level of antipsychotic drug use in children is abnormally high. - Incorrect. Opposite.

B.The fact that the number of children taking antipsychotic medicines increased 73 percent over the last four years is not an indication that the current level of use is abnormally high. - Correct. Even if the consumption rate increased by 100%, it's still closer to the normal consumption rate and not abnormally high. So 73% increase over 66/10000 is closer to 110/10000.

C.If only 6.6 out of every 1,000 children are taking an antipsychotic medication, the increase in the use of such medicines cannot be the percentage Antoine cites. - Incorrect. Opposes the stated facts.

D. It is unlikely that the increase in the use of antipsychotic medicines by children will continue at the same rate. - Incorrect. Out of scope.

E. If the number of children taking antipsychotic drugs is given as a certain number, the actual rate of such drug use is even higher. - Incorrect. Out of scope. Cannot be inferred.

Answer: B
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Sep 2015
Posts: 66
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Mar 2017, 03:40
If the number of children taking antipsychotic medication is still within the normal range, the rate at which the total number has increased is
not cause for alarm. Lucy shows that even though the total number of children on such medications has increased, children still take antipsychotic drugs at an even lower rate than do adults, and the current adult rate is considered normal. Ans. B
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 65
Location: India
GMAT 1: 510 Q46 V17
WE: Web Development (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 07:10
How B is the conclusion.. ??

Lucy statement says that 6.6 per 1000 was last year's number. What if this year increased and become equal to 11 per 1000. If Lucy compares both adult and childrens number in current year, we can conclude B as conclusion.

Can anyone explain ?

Sent from my KIW-L22 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

-Yuvaraj
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Stop searching someone to motivate you.

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 45
Location: United Arab Emirates
Concentration: Healthcare, International Business
Schools: Queen's MBA'20
GMAT 1: 580 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.19
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Apr 2018, 23:25
but USED IN Lucy's STATEMENT IS AN INDICATION THAT SHE OPPOSES ANTOINE
IMO ans is B
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 530
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
CAT Tests
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2018, 01:40
chetan2u wrote:
varunchand wrote:
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking anti-psychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking anti-psychotic medicines during the same period.

Lucy: But the use of anti-psychotic drugs by adults is considered normal at the current rate of 11 adults per 1,000 taking the drugs. In contrast, the number of children on anti-psychotic medication last year was 6.6 per 1,000 children.

Lucy's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

A) The current level of anti-psychotic drug use among children is extremely high

B) The fact that number of children taking anti-psychotic drugs increased 73% over the last 4 years is not an indication that the current level of use is abnormally high

C) If only 6.6 of every 1000 children are taking an anti psychotic medicine, the increase in the use of such medicines cannot be the percentage that Antoine cites

D)It is unlikely that the increase in the use of anti-psychotic medicines by children will continue at the same rate

E) If the number of children taking anti-psychotoc drugs is given as a certain number, the actual rate of such drug use is even higher

P.S The question stem is similar to another on MGMAT, but differs subtly; kindly do not delete. Also, please note that OA is unavailable.


Hi,
i feel the statement of Antoine itself is not very clear..
He compares increase in percentage of one group to increase in pure number , even if he meant otherwise..Although one may argue that "that" stands for the number `but i dont think it is clear..
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking anti-psychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking anti-psychotic medicines during the same period.

hello VeritasPrepBrandon..
how can we compare two different groups and infer usage of a younger group from an accepted normal rate in adults....
It may be that even 6.6 could be a high number for this group looking at the age bracketbecause Lucy very clearly speaks of 11 as normal for adults and keeps 19 yrs and below out of it..


I agree with this fault in reasoning. The OA needs an assumption for it to be correct and the assumption is that if 11 is normal then 6 can also be a normal level for the children's group.
IMO this is an incorrect question. Thanks.
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq :)

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 13 Mar 2017
Posts: 622
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2018, 01:52
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking anti-psychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking anti-psychotic medicines during the same period.

Lucy: But the use of anti-psychotic drugs by adults is considered normal at the current rate of 11 adults per 1,000 taking the drugs. In contrast, the number of children on anti-psychotic medication last year was 6.6 per 1,000 children.

Lucy's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

A) The current level of anti-psychotic drug use among children is extremely high
Lucy is pointing out the opposite of this..

B) The fact that number of children taking anti-psychotic drugs increased 73% over the last 4 years is not an indication that the current level of use is abnormally high
Though the number of children taking anti-psychotic drugs has increased by a huge percentage over the last 4 years, even then the current number is not as high as adults.. This is exactly what is pointed by Lucy.

C) If only 6.6 of every 1000 children are taking an anti psychotic medicine, the increase in the use of such medicines cannot be the percentage that Antoine cites
No such conclusion is drawn by Lucy.. She just said that the number last year was 6.6 per 1000 children.

D) It is unlikely that the increase in the use of anti-psychotic medicines by children will continue at the same rate
No comment has been provided by Lucy about the future rate of the use of anti-psychotic medicines.

E) If the number of children taking anti-psychotoc drugs is given as a certain number, the actual rate of such drug use is even higherNo such conclusion has bee drawn..
_________________

CAT 2017 99th percentiler : VA 97.27 | DI-LR 96.84 | QA 98.04 | OA 98.95
UPSC Aspirants : Get my app UPSC Important News Reader from Play store.

MBA Social Network : WebMaggu


Appreciate by Clicking +1 Kudos ( Lets be more generous friends.)



What I believe is : "Nothing is Impossible, Even Impossible says I'm Possible" : "Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish".

VP
VP
User avatar
V
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1264
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GMAT 1: 480 Q38 V22
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2018, 03:47
varunchand wrote:
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking anti-psychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking anti-psychotic medicines during the same period.

Lucy: But the use of anti-psychotic drugs by adults is considered normal at the current rate of 11 adults per 1,000 taking the drugs. In contrast, the number of children on anti-psychotic medication last year was 6.6 per 1,000 children.


Lucy's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

A) The current level of anti-psychotic drug use among children is extremely high

B) The fact that number of children taking anti-psychotic drugs increased 73% over the last 4 years is not an indication that the current level of use is abnormally high

C) If only 6.6 of every 1000 children are taking an anti psychotic medicine, the increase in the use of such medicines cannot be the percentage that Antoine cites

D) It is unlikely that the increase in the use of anti-psychotic medicines by children will continue at the same rate

E) If the number of children taking anti-psychotoc drugs is given as a certain number, the actual rate of such drug use is even higher


"B" is the best choice among available answer choices.
_________________

"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo &nbs [#permalink] 17 Apr 2018, 03:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and yo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.