abhik1502
thanks AjiteshArun !
If my understanding is correct then in given example
X poured into Y -- is in active voice when X is doer of action Pouring
Otherwise incase X is not the doer of action then "poured into Y" acts as verb-ed modifier.
Hi
abhik1502,
Close enough, but we should probably also spend some time on the way
pour has been used here.
Pour does
not mean
~put into (for example, a vessel) here. Have a look at the following sentences:
1.
He poured the tea into a cup. ← "someone put something in something"
2.
He poured money into the bond market. ← "someone moved something quickly, in large amounts"
3.
Money poured into the bond market. ← "something moved quickly, in large amounts"
In (3), there is no "doer" of the type that is there in (2), but all three are fine (they are all complete sentences).
You'll find more examples
here (the second entry, "to flow quickly and in large amounts").