Last visit was: 29 Apr 2024, 06:36 It is currently 29 Apr 2024, 06:36

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33035 [2]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Dec 2023
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Feb 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33035 [1]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Archaeologist: There were several sandstone statues of a female figure [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Official Explanation

­An assumption would be a proposition that must necessarily be true for the conclusion. Also, negating the assumption should make it impossible for the conclusion to hold.

Let’s evaluate each of the answer choices.

A. The conclusion says that how the next-to-be-recovered statue is modeled will help determine which section sculpted it. So, a statement that says this statue will be one sculpted by the women of that time cannot possibly be an assumption.

B. It is sandstone statues that are discussed in the argument. Whether or not materials other than sandstone were used for sculpting is not really relevant to the argument.

C. Whether "All other artifacts" were statues made from sandstone is not important for the conclusion to be drawn and so cannot be an assumption.

D. The argument presents no distinction of class among the kids. And this is not required to be assumed - its being true or false does not determine whether the conclusion can be drawn.

E. Even if there was no overlap, it would be possible to determine which section sculpted the statue. This does not have to be true so cannot be an assumption.

F. Yes. This has to be true for the argument to hold and thus, qualifies as a fair assumption. Unless the statue is of a female figure made of sandstone, none of the techniques mentioned in the passage can be employed. Also, if we remove this assumption, we are not sure what type of statue the next statue would be and we cannot employ the already learnt knowledge about female statues on sandstone. In that case, the conclusion that we will be able to determine which section of the ancient society sculpted the next statue cannot hold true.

Hence, for the Assumption column, F is the correct answer choice.

Now that we have found the assumption, which of the remaining answer choices is a fact that would provide significant logical support for the required assumption? Clearly, C, All other artifacts recovered from the archaeological site were statues made from sandstone, is a supporting fact.

Hence, for the Possible fact column, C is the correct answer choice.­
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Archaeologist: There were several sandstone statues of a female figure [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92990 posts
DI Forum Moderator
1030 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11185 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne