kntombat wrote:
AndrewN would love to hear your take on this question, I narrowed it down to C and E but at the last moment chose C. Why is E a better option than C??
Hello,
kntombat. I considered the same two answers before settling on (E). Why? It has to do with expressed meaning. Consider each sentence:
Quote:
Art is a visual way for some people to reflect upon what is going on in their cultural and natural environment, and allows a way to see how people perceive their natural world.
C) while allowing another way to see how people perceive their natural world
E) while allowing others a way to see how people perceive their natural world
Choice (C) holds
a visual way as a like entity to
another way. If we think of the latter as something other than
a visual way, we run into a problem:
Art is a visual way for some people to reflect upon [something], while allowing a non-visual way to see how people perceive their natural world.Granted,
a non-visual way is one interpretation of
another way, but I think you will agree that it places the description
to see in an awkward position, not to mention that the latter part of the sentence could be addressing us or an understood
you directly. Even though
to see is synonymous with
to understand, the sentence is not immediately clear in its usage of
another way to see. That takes some sorting out. Meanwhile, choice (E) holds
some people parallel to
others, or other people. And this comparison makes more sense: some people believe that art offers insight into the goings on of
their cultural and natural environment, while others focus more on the artists and how those creators
perceive their natural world. Unlike the earlier sentence that seemed to break the fourth wall and speak to us, the readers, this latter option keeps matters simpler by comparing some people to other people. Choice (E) is harder to argue against, which is why I chose it in the end.
I hope that helps. Thank you for thinking to ask me.
- Andrew