Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
29 Jul 2025, 07:37
Kudos
Bookmarks
Asked ChatGPT for a solution to this problem, as I couldn't understand why "Large abstract sculpture by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.)" wasn't a perfect fit for FA. Here's the analysis it gave. I don't understand how the GMAT logic works.
ChatGPT:
To solve this, we must match artworks to each museum (MM and FA) without violating their exhibit requirements.
[hr]
Requirements Recap:
MM (Museo Metropolitano):
FA (Fundación Arte):
[hr]
Option Analysis:
[hr]
✅
Correct Answer Selections:
Let me know if you’d like a breakdown grid or printable summary.
ChatGPT:
To solve this, we must match artworks to each museum (MM and FA) without violating their exhibit requirements.
[hr]
Requirements Recap:
MM (Museo Metropolitano):
- Strengths:
- East Asian printmaking
- 19th-century European art
- 18th-century US painting/sculpture
- Next exhibit must be:
- Non-European
- Non-US
- From 20th century
FA (Fundación Arte):
- Strengths:
- 20th-century US painting
- 20th-century jewelry
- Art from 14th-century South America
- Next exhibit must be:
- Abstract or semirepresentational
- Preferably US women artists
[hr]
Option Analysis:
- Large abstract sculpture by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.)
- Abstract ✅
- US ✅
- Female ✅
- 20th century ✅
- ✅ Fits FA’s theme perfectly
- Representational woodblock prints by Hashiguchi Goyo (male, Japan, 20th c.)
- East Asian ✅
- Printmaking ✅
- 20th century ✅
- Non-European/US ✅
- ✅ Fits MM’s requirement perfectly
- Semirepresentational painting by Paul Cézanne (male, France, 19th c.)
- European ❌ (Not allowed at MM)
- 19th century ❌ (Not allowed at either for current exhibit)
- ❌ Invalid for both
- Semiabstract, semirepresentational art nouveau jewelry by René Lalique (male, France, 20th c.)
- Abstract/semi ✅
- Jewelry ✅ (FA strength)
- France ❌ (Not US or South American woman)
- Possible, but not preferred over Louise Nevelson for FA
- ⚠️ Less ideal for FA
- Semirepresentational painting by Yuan Chin-Taa (male, Taiwan, 20th c.)
- East Asian ✅
- 20th century ✅
- Not fully abstract ✅
- ✅ Acceptable for MM
- ❌ Doesn’t fit FA’s US women artist preference
[hr]
✅
Correct Answer Selections:
- MM:
✅ Representational woodblock prints by Hashiguchi Goyo (Japan, 20th c.) - FA:
✅ Large abstract sculpture by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.)
Let me know if you’d like a breakdown grid or printable summary.
Sajjad1994
29 Jul 2025, 19:01
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hey!
I actively use ChatGPT and Claude to help create questions suiting my requirements.
Take it from me -> The LLMs are not yet perfect in their reasoning abilities. In other words, don't assume chatGPT is correct. As of now, there are enough instances of incorrect reasoning to be wary.
I have seen LLMs do RC pretty well, and most if not all CR. With some of the DI question types, and some logic-over-math type quant questions, I still think there is a distance to cover.
Coming to this question ->
(1) "As part of a joint process two museums - Museo Metropolitano (MM) and the Fundacion Arte (FA)- have decided to require that exhibits at each museum be directly connected to the strengths of their permanent collections."
Observe the bolded portion. This means that it is compulsory that the exhibits be connected to FA (and MM's) strengths.
(2) FA's strengths -> "the FA's strengths are 20th century US painting, 20th-century jewelry, and art from 14th-century South America."
It is absolutely compulsory that whatever is chosen be either
- 20C US painting or
- 20C jewelry or
- 14C South American Art
[color=#000000]
Choice -> Large abstract sculpture by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.).
This is
- Not a 20C US Painting (it is a sculpture, not a painting)
- Not 20C jewelry (it is a sculpture, not jewelry)
- Not 14C South American art (not 20C, not South American)
In essence, we are given that the exhibit must be connected to FA's strengths. 20C US sculpture is not connected to any of the above strengths.
Hope this helps.
---
Harsha[/color]
I actively use ChatGPT and Claude to help create questions suiting my requirements.
Take it from me -> The LLMs are not yet perfect in their reasoning abilities. In other words, don't assume chatGPT is correct. As of now, there are enough instances of incorrect reasoning to be wary.
I have seen LLMs do RC pretty well, and most if not all CR. With some of the DI question types, and some logic-over-math type quant questions, I still think there is a distance to cover.
Coming to this question ->
(1) "As part of a joint process two museums - Museo Metropolitano (MM) and the Fundacion Arte (FA)- have decided to require that exhibits at each museum be directly connected to the strengths of their permanent collections."
Observe the bolded portion. This means that it is compulsory that the exhibits be connected to FA (and MM's) strengths.
(2) FA's strengths -> "the FA's strengths are 20th century US painting, 20th-century jewelry, and art from 14th-century South America."
It is absolutely compulsory that whatever is chosen be either
- 20C US painting or
- 20C jewelry or
- 14C South American Art
[color=#000000]
Choice -> Large abstract sculpture by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.).
This is
- Not a 20C US Painting (it is a sculpture, not a painting)
- Not 20C jewelry (it is a sculpture, not jewelry)
- Not 14C South American art (not 20C, not South American)
In essence, we are given that the exhibit must be connected to FA's strengths. 20C US sculpture is not connected to any of the above strengths.
Hope this helps.
---
Harsha[/color]
faadbanda
