Last visit was: 12 May 2024, 13:36 It is currently 12 May 2024, 13:36

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14021
Own Kudos [?]: 33611 [0]
Given Kudos: 5787
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Posts: 348
Own Kudos [?]: 426 [2]
Given Kudos: 94
Send PM
Retired Moderator
Joined: 28 Feb 2020
Posts: 948
Own Kudos [?]: 487 [1]
Given Kudos: 839
Location: India
WE:Other (Other)
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14021
Own Kudos [?]: 33611 [0]
Given Kudos: 5787
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: As you know, our revenues have declined for each of the past three qua [#permalink]
Expert Reply
kntombat wrote:
The answers for Question 1 are:
1) NO (The data present doesn't talk about any other gender or age group)
1) NO (The data doesn't talk about how expensive the ads are based on their run time.)
1) NO (We know the percentage of women and not their exact number, this data is also un inferable.)

The answer for Question 2 are:
Option B (20,000,000- \(\frac{45*20,000,000}{100}\) - \(\frac{35*20,000,000}{100}\)= 4,000,000)

The answer for Question 3 are:
1) YES (the first mail shows that this strategy has succeeded 3 times before.)
2) YES (the First mail shows that this strategy did lead to an increase in revenue all the 3 times it had been used before.)
3) YES (Can be inferred from the first mail.)


OA of second question is D
Retired Moderator
Joined: 28 Feb 2020
Posts: 948
Own Kudos [?]: 487 [0]
Given Kudos: 839
Location: India
WE:Other (Other)
Send PM
Re: As you know, our revenues have declined for each of the past three qua [#permalink]
Sajjad1994, could you provide the OE for the second question, I would love to know where I have gone wrong.
Thanks.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14021
Own Kudos [?]: 33611 [2]
Given Kudos: 5787
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: As you know, our revenues have declined for each of the past three qua [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
kntombat wrote:
Sajjad1994, could you provide the OE for the second question, I would love to know where I have gone wrong.
Thanks.


Official Explanation

2. If there are 20,000,000 females aged 15–25, then how many females aged 15–25 (in millions) watch neither Blonde Fury nor Hart Attack?

Email #1 describes the company’s plan to increase revenue by ramping up advertising to females aged 15−25. Email #2 identifies the two most popular programs among females aged 15−25. Memo #1 presents advertising and viewership data for the two programs.

According to Memo #1, 45% of females aged 15−25 watch Blonde Fury and 35% of females aged 15−25 watch Hart Attack. If there are 20,000,000 females aged 15−25, then 0.45 × 20,000,000 = 9,000,000 watch Blonde Fury, and 0.35 × 20,000,000 = 7,000,000 watch Hart Attack.

According to Email #2, 80% of female viewers aged 15−25 who watch Hart Attack also watch Blonde Fury. If 7,000,000 females aged 15−25 watch Hart Attack, then 0.80 × 7,000,000 = 5,600,000 who watch Hart Attack also watch Blonde Fury.

Use the group formula to answer the question, group 1 + group 2 + neither –both = total. Substitute the calculated values into the formula, so that 7,000,000 + 9,000,000 + neither – 5,600,000 = 20,000,000. Simplify the equation, so that neither = 9,600,000.

The correct answer is (D).
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2022
Posts: 117
Own Kudos [?]: 65 [0]
Given Kudos: 165
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.14
Send PM
Re: As you know, our revenues have declined for each of the past three qua [#permalink]
Why "The ratio of female viewers aged 15 to 25 to dollars spent on advertising for Hart Attack is greater than that for Blonde Fury." official answer is "No"? (first question, item c)

I did the following:
ratio of female viewers aged 15 to 25 to dollars = r
Blonde Furry:
r1 = 45%/70 thousands of dollars = 0.64
Hart Attack:
r2 = 35%/50 thousands of dolars = 0.70
So r2>r1 => statement is true => "Yes"

What is wrong? Why I can't use percentages? I mean... if the total of female viewers aged 15 to 25 is T, the female viewers aged 15 to 25 who watches Hart Attack is 0.35T, and the conclusion is the same
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11244
Own Kudos [?]: 32468 [1]
Given Kudos: 301
Send PM
Re: As you know, our revenues have declined for each of the past three qua [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
mmdfl wrote:
Why "The ratio of female viewers aged 15 to 25 to dollars spent on advertising for Hart Attack is greater than that for Blonde Fury." official answer is "No"? (first question, item c)

I did the following:
ratio of female viewers aged 15 to 25 to dollars = r
Blonde Furry:
r1 = 45%/70 thousands of dollars = 0.64
Hart Attack:
r2 = 35%/50 thousands of dolars = 0.70
So r2>r1 => statement is true => "Yes"

What is wrong? Why I can't use percentages? I mean... if the total of female viewers aged 15 to 25 is T, the female viewers aged 15 to 25 who watches Hart Attack is 0.35T, and the conclusion is the same


Calculations are wrong.
It is 55k, so \(\frac{35}{55}\) or 0.6363
GMAT Club Bot
Re: As you know, our revenues have declined for each of the past three qua [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
93184 posts
DI Forum Moderator
1029 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11244 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne