cheers,
I was actually considering INSEAD, language requirements were not an issue for me, however the 10 month length of course was the key factor in me not applying. I have to be able to have some sort of balance with family life because of my kids.
Anyway, the much larger class size at INSEAD (and its reputation) should ensure INSEAD gains more nationalities. HKUST does very well for international representation considering its class size. This years class so far of around 70 students represent 20 countries. As stated, INSEAD is in a different league to HKUST, i don`t think anyone can question that. I`m just glad to get into a school which appears to be heading somewhere and building momentum in a region i intend to stay in post-mba.
This years students internships include :-
3M
ABN Amro
AXA
Blackrock
Citibank
Deutsche Bank
HSBC
ING
Lehman Brothers
Methanex
Merrill Lynch
Softbank
TPG
(that was the data given to me).
Lastly, quantative measures used to compare most things are too mechanical in my opinion. Qualitative measures are just as important, but a re much more difficult to measure. In others words, What the result is only 50% of the story. How it was achieved and under what circumstances is the other 50% Unfortunately when doing a statistical comparison, all you get is half the answer. Unfortunately most people do not attend 2 schools to be able to effectively compare the qualitative capabilities of a school.
For what it`s worth, these measures influenced my decision to attend HKUST, in Vault.com, there were several reviews from students who did an exchange to HKUST from top US B-schools and all of them were saying the courses they attended were just as good as the ones from their school.
As an example, a Manager who achieves and exceeds the results that are needed but at the same time, destroys motivation, burns out his staff due to his negative approaches can`t really be seen as trully succesful because the long term issue of keeping highly skilled employers is being undermined and effectively reduces the competitveness of the company down the line. Leadership retention and development is a key strategic area for companies.