Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:49 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:49

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 1960
Own Kudos [?]: 332 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2437
Own Kudos [?]: 1682 [0]
Given Kudos: 210
Send PM
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 260
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2437
Own Kudos [?]: 1682 [0]
Given Kudos: 210
Send PM
[#permalink]
Thanks,

This is good information.

naturallight wrote:
with S&T, you're basically trying to unload the equity from the IPOs and other transactions that the i-bankers do. you make money based on the fees from the brokerage. near as I can tell, the traders are more "operational" traders--not speculators. the sales guys usually have high level relationships with the 1st buyers of the securities--big pension funds etc.

with AM, you're helping to manage a fund. so you could do things like research, portfolio mgmt, or trading (both execution and speculation), but the end goal is to help the fund outperform. you make your money based on mgmt and sometimes performance fees that the fund generates.

Prop trading is a form of AM, but it usually takes place at a bank. you're running a fund that helps invest the excess cash that the bank generates. these guys are the cream of the crop, and often they spin off to form hedge funds. I believe guys like eric mindich and dinakar singh fall in this category.

not sure if this is all 100% correct, but I think it's in the right direction.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 1960
Own Kudos [?]: 332 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
asset management seems to be more in line with research. sales and trading seems to be more like pricing stocks/bonds correctly. is this correct naturallight?
SVP
SVP
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2209
Own Kudos [?]: 520 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Schools:Darden
 Q50  V51
Send PM
[#permalink]
To me, the big difference is the scope and focus of their operations. People in S&T are responsible for one segment of the market, or one type of stocks. Their job is to keep track of all stocks in the energy sector, or the tech sector, or options. They trade in order to "make markets", and essentially they make money for their firms by making markets and facilitating trading. There are some exceptions (like the prop desks that Naturalight talked about) but generally speaking people in S&T do not necessarily make money by taking positions on stocks. Certainly, they will try to stay ahead of the news, etc., but their role is really to make the market and facilitate trades.

Asset managers tend to look at a variety of stocks. Certainly, some are focused on certain sectors or certain investing styles, but their goal is to make money based on where the money is invested. They might take long or short positions, but their role is to make money based on how the money is invested.

A really really over-simplified way to look at it is that S&T people care less about stock prices and more about trading volume, they only care about prices to the extent that they hold stocks while making markets; most traders a limited by the positions they can take. On the other hand asset managers care only about stock price and which way it is moving.
GMAT Club Bot
[#permalink]

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne