Last visit was: 27 Jul 2024, 00:06 It is currently 27 Jul 2024, 00:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 324
Own Kudos [?]: 1781 [15]
Given Kudos: 348
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2018
Posts: 141
Own Kudos [?]: 290 [1]
Given Kudos: 156
Concentration: Technology, Nonprofit
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
WE:Analyst (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 297
Own Kudos [?]: 197 [0]
Given Kudos: 115
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Send PM
VP
VP
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1245
Own Kudos [?]: 208 [1]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: Astronomer: In most cases in which a planet has been detected orbiti [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I don't fully understand C. Can someone elaborate?
Re: Astronomer: In most cases in which a planet has been detected orbiti [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I choose D with the below explanation.
The conclusion is "some of the planets in oval orbits around distant stars were probably thrown into those orbits by close encounters with other planets orbiting the same stars."
To strengthen the conclusion, D says that
"(D) Most comets with an oval orbit around our sun were thrown into that orbit by a close encounter with some other object."
,so these comets were thrown into that orbit by a close encounter.
This is the same reasoning as the conclusion.

GMATNinja , Could you please help us?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6985
Own Kudos [?]: 64604 [1]
Given Kudos: 1824
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Astronomer: In most cases in which a planet has been detected orbiti [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
BenjaminWS wrote:
I choose D with the below explanation.
The conclusion is "some of the planets in oval orbits around distant stars were probably thrown into those orbits by close encounters with other planets orbiting the same stars."
To strengthen the conclusion, D says that
"(D) Most comets with an oval orbit around our sun were thrown into that orbit by a close encounter with some other object."
,so these comets were thrown into that orbit by a close encounter.
This is the same reasoning as the conclusion.

GMATNinja , Could you please help us?

According to the passage, because many comets have oval orbits as the result of close encounters with planets orbiting the sun, some planets have oval orbits as a result of close encounters with other planets. But how do we know that these planets are comparable to comets? The author seems to assume that the orbits of planets and comets are similar, but he/she provides no basis for doing so.

The question asks for an answer choice that would strengthen the argument. With that in mind, here’s (D):

Quote:
(D)  Most comets with an oval orbit around our sun were thrown into that orbit by a close encounter with some other object.

The passage has already established that MANY comets orbiting the sun are thrown into oval orbits by close encounters with planets. (C) only adds that MOST comets with oval orbits were thrown into oval orbits by a close encounter with some other object.

But we still have no reason to believe that comets and planets are similar. And while we have more information about comets, we don’t have any additional information about planets. For that reason, we can eliminate (D).

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Sep 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: Korea, Republic of
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.6
Send PM
Re: Astronomer: In most cases in which a planet has been detected orbiti [#permalink]
Quote:
Astronomer: In most cases in which a planet has been detected orbiting a distant star, the planet's orbit is distinctly oval, whereas the orbits of Earth
and several other planets around our sun are approximately circular. However, many comets orbiting our sun have been thrown into oval orbits by close encounters with planets orbiting our sun. So some of the planets in oval orbits around distant stars were probably thrown into those orbits by close encounters with other planets orbiting the same stars.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the astronomer's argument?


Type: Argument
Conclusion: some of the planets in oval orbits around distant stars were probably thrown into those orbits by close encounters with other planets orbiting the same stars
Premise:  many comets orbiting our sun have been thrown into oval orbits by close encounters with planets orbiting our sun
Answer: (C)  In most cases in which planets have been discovered orbiting a distant star, more than one planet has been found orbiting the star.

Why: (C) and (D) are two candidates. (D) is a known fact as it is already mentioned in the argument. In fact, it is the PREMISE!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Astronomer: In most cases in which a planet has been detected orbiti [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6985 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts