Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:21 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,385
Own Kudos:
778,206
 [4]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,385
Kudos: 778,206
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ajay0520
Joined: 21 Oct 2023
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
45
 [4]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 58
Kudos: 45
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
foookato
Joined: 16 Nov 2024
Last visit: 22 Jun 2025
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
11
 [3]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: United States
Posts: 14
Kudos: 11
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
cburchfield
Joined: 11 Feb 2025
Last visit: 01 Aug 2025
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 19
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is my thought process:

A. Seems contradictory to the stated premise
B. Seems unrelated
C. Sounds like this could be a strengthener
D. Firms rarely use someone with the same level of expertise within the area they are interviewing in. Well this is the same issue that founders have. Why would they need to use a firm then? This absolutely weakens. Correct answer.
E. This might be true and maybe a weakener however the premise is about getting a quality candidate and not about salary.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,385
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,385
Kudos: 778,206
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
At a start-up company, hiring is often done by the company's founder. Since founders are often experts in fields far removed from the expertise they are looking for in employees, hiring decisions in early-stage start-ups can result in poor matches between the company and the employee. Enough poor matches can make it nearly impossible for such a company to succeed in the marketplace.

Which of the following, if true, points to the most serious flaw of a start-up founder's plan to outsource hiring to a firm that specializes in matching employees and early-stage start-up companies?

(A) It is not well understood why founders often make poor choices when selecting new employees for their companies.

(B) If a founder is successful in hiring an employee that is a good match for his company, he or she will not necessarily be successful the next time a new employee must be hired.

(C) While founders tend to make decisions quickly, firms that handle hiring decisions for start-up companies interview more candidates and take longer to select an employee.

(D) Firms that handle hiring decisions for start-ups rarely use interviewers who have the expertise that a start-up company is looking for in a given employee.

(E) The average starting salary paid to employees selected by outside firms is considerably higher than the average starting salary paid to employees hired directly by a start-up's founder.

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



D

The argument suggests that founders can make poor hiring decisions, while the question wonders why it would be a mistake for those same founders to outsource the same hiring decisions. This is a "flaw" question, which is closely related to a weaken question.

Choice (A) doesn't weaken the argument, it has no effect. (B) simply reiterates some of what is said in the passage - founders aren't necessarily good at making hiring decisions. (C) is an irrelevant comparison. We're concerned with "good matches", not the amount of time it takes to make decisions.

Choice (D) weakens the argument. The assumption underlying the plan is that firms that handle hiring would not have the same problems as founders. (D) suggests that they do. Choice (E), like (C), is irrelevant, as the passage is not concerned with salary, only with the quality of the match. Choice (D) is
correct.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts