achan
Just to rephrase you ..
The question asks the NET amount the dealer has from the inventory (value at the beginning of the year -value of inventory at the end of year + purchasing cost) and not the amount he spent to buy the cars.
Please confirm.
Even if above is the case, choice (1) gives purchasing cost 50*18000 and choice (2) gives Revenue(value at the beginning of the year - value of inventory at the end of year)
I still believe this question is ambiguous in nature.
mmphf
achan
OA is E.
The question clearly asks "What is the total amount spent by the dealership on the cars it had in stock at the end of the last year?". Hence, why do we need the cost of the cars sold?
Not the price that they were sold for, but the cost that the dealer paid to purchase those cars. Not sure if you are thinking that the question is asking how were costs for the entire year. They want to know the cost of the inventory still in stock at the end of the year.
The dealer's cost of the cars left at the end of the year is the cost in stock at the beginning of the year plus the cost of inventory purchase minus the cost of inventory sold. We don't know the cost of what was sold, only the price the dealer was able to sell it for.
The question is not ambiguous in nature in my opinion. The questions asks "What is the total amount spent by the dealership on the
cars it had in stock at the end of the last year?
So basically its asking how much money did the dealer spent on the number of cars which were left in the inventory.
We know he sold some cars for some money but we don't know for much each of them was sold.
So lets take the statement one by one now.
1) Last year the dealership purchased 50 cars for $18,000 each
Okay, so now know how total amount of money did he spend in total for 200 cars, we don't know how many were left at the end of the year.
2) Last year the total revenue from the sale of the cars was $180,000
So now we know that he sold some but we don't know how many, so say he sold 10 cars each for 18000 then the total number of cars left were 190 on which he spent 20000*150 + 40*18000 each but now say he sold 10 cars for 20000 then the answer changes and hence both the statement together as well are insufficient.
I hope that helps ..!