Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:36 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
acid_burn
Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Last visit: 09 Oct 2005
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Posts: 12
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chriswil2005
Joined: 04 May 2005
Last visit: 17 Jun 2010
Posts: 93
Own Kudos:
Location: Chicago
Posts: 93
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vikramm
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Last visit: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 156
Own Kudos:
Posts: 156
Kudos: 242
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
richardj
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Last visit: 23 Oct 2005
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Posts: 91
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could the opening poster please check the wording of statement 1 please ? It isn't a complete sentence.

We know the rate of growth increases.

The number of bacteria must be an integer.
You can't have half a bacteria.

So X=2 or X=3 under 2.
User avatar
davesh
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Last visit: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 10
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chriswil2005
Ok, I want to say E. I have feeling this could be wrong, but here is my reasoning. The stem does not give very much information (as some DS problems do). It it not clear whether "some number larger" is the same number each hour. Maybe we can assume this. If so, it doesn't say that that the number of bacteria is an integer. All we know is that the original number is great than one and is increasing every hour

1. Insufficient. X=original amount, Y=amount increased each hour, then we have: XY^3=385. 2 variables that we can't figure out.

2. Insufficient. X<4. Combined with the stem, 1<X<4. Like I said, I'm assuming that the origainal amount is not an integer, so it could be any number between 1 and 4. We still don't know Y.

Together, X can be an infinite amount of numbers, so there is no way to figure out Y. E is my answer.

I have a gut feeling I am missing something important, and that I am wrong.


Geometric funda wont work here since it is mentioned that the "rate of growth" also increases every hour..Answer anyway should be 'E' only.


Davesh.
User avatar
jinino
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Last visit: 20 Mar 2009
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 61
Kudos: 33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="acid_burn"]At the end of every hour a culture of bacteria becomes some number of times larger than it was the previous hour. If the number of bacteria was originally greater than 1 and if the rate of growth also increases every hour, what was the original number of bacteria?

1) of the original culture would have resulted in a total of 385 bacteria after 3 hours.

2) The original number of bacteria was less than 4.


I pick E and here is my reasoning:

First consider 1). It tells us after 3 hours, the original number of bacteria grows to 385. And from the question the original number of bacteria is greater than 1 and the rate of growth increases every hour. We can have either the original number of bateria as a small number, (ie. 2 for example) and have the rapid rate of growth to reach 385 after 3 hours or the original number of bacteria as a larger number, (ie. 90 for example) and have the slower rate of growth. So 1) is not sufficient and we eliminate A and D.

Consider 2). It tells us the originial number of bacteria was less than 4. And from the question we know the original number of bacteria is greater than 1. This leaves two possibilites, 2 and 3. Same rational as above, we cannot determine which number is the right one. We eliminate B.

Combining 1) and 2), we still cannot solve the problem we face above, and we eliminate C and the answer is E.

Pls let us know the OA.
User avatar
richardj
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Last visit: 23 Oct 2005
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Posts: 91
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I still think there is something missing from the opening post.
User avatar
acid_burn
Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Last visit: 09 Oct 2005
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Posts: 12
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sorry guys, I have missed a number in statement 1. I edited the post so that
everything is included now.

:oops:
User avatar
need700111
Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Last visit: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Posts: 24
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i thin i got it.. correct me if i am wrong.

1. statement 1 says 1/3 of the original culture would have resulted....

which means the number must be 3 or multiple of 3 ie, 3,6,9.....

insuff

2. statement 2 says original number of bacteria was less than 4

insuff

but together they come to a result 3 as the original number of bacteria.

is it so simple or i am being too optimistic??
User avatar
Antmavel
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Last visit: 05 Apr 2014
Posts: 581
Own Kudos:
Location: London, UK
Schools:Tuck'08
Posts: 581
Kudos: 134
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Same for me
C too

from (1) we know that the number of bacteria is divisible by 3

from (2) that this number is <4

it can only be 3
User avatar
acid_burn
Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Last visit: 09 Oct 2005
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Posts: 12
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I like your reasoning guys, the official answer uses similar logic but is more lenghty. they use an equation (1/3x)abc = 385 where x is the number of bacteria and a&b&c are rate of growth.

thus xabc = 1155

1155 has four prime factors : 3,5,7,11, which is unsufficient to tell the original number of bacteria since it can be 3,5,7,11 or 5,3,7,11 or 7,3,5,11 . Each pair gives a number for the bacteria and an increasing growth rate.

From statement two, we know that the original number of bacteria is less than 4. When both are combined only one pair complies - 3,5,7,11 where x=3

Therefore, the answer is C



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105368 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts