shanks2020
Based on recent box office receipts, the public's appetite for documentary films, like its interest in nonfiction books, seems to be on the rise. –Here, if momentarily mask the modifier in between the commas, then it will be clear that the verb actually belongs to the public's appetite for documentary films; thus what follow like is not a clause but simply a noun phrase. Hence E is good.
Thank you for your reply. First I thought E is the answer but then I thought maybe ellipses are in play in A.
Based on recent box office receipts, the public's appetite for documentary films, like
[ the public's appetite for ]nonfiction books, seems to be on the rise.
Do we need an indicator to check if ellipses are used for eg.
Based on recent box office receipts, the public's appetite for documentary films, like for nonfiction books, seems to be on the rise.
Based on recent box office receipts, the public's appetite for documentary films, like that for nonfiction books, seems to be on the rise.[/quote]
MartyTargetTestPrep KarishmaB I had the same query above. Why is elipses not cosidered after like in option A?[/quote]
'Like' is used to give similarity or in some cases, to give examples. It is used as a preposition and should be followed by a noun.
We cannot use 'like for...' - two prepositions next to each other.
Ellipsis is not the solution to all missing words in a sentence. They are used only when we omit some words from a sentence because the context is quite clear and does not require repetition.
I saw two dogs and she saw three.
What three? Obviously 'dogs'[/quote]
KarishmaBThanks for the explanation.
Any specifc/generic rule where ellipses can be correct and where not?
Usually they are often seen after "than". But still, what would be rules guiding them?[/quote]
Hello
shanks2020,
We hope this finds you well.
To provide a bit of clarity here, in this sentence, the rule of ellipses is not actually at play; here, the comparison is not between the actions taken by "its interest in nonfiction books" and "the public's appetite for documentary films"; it is between "its interest in nonfiction books" and "the public's appetite for documentary films" themselves.
The use of a "like" phrase to modify "the public's appetite for documentary films" indicates that the structure of the comparison and the intended meaning is that
"the public's appetite for documentary films" is like "its interest in nonfiction books" in that both are on the rise.
We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global team[/quote]
ExpertsGlobal5With the earlier explanations and answer, it is understood that the ellipses are not at play here.
But the question here is when and how do we know whether ellipses are there or not? When do ellipses make more sense?[/quote]
Hello
shanks2020,
We hope this finds you well.
To answer your query, on GMAT, the rule of ellipses most commonly comes into play when a verb is repeated in making a comparison.
Beyond that, ellipses can also be applied when the subject of the sentence is repeated.
We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team[/quote]
KarishmaB MartyTargetTestPrep In the below question, why 2nd option can not have ellipses?
(1)From their early days, baby monkeys display the same social behavior that their mothers do.
(2)From their early days, baby monkeys display the same social behavior as their mothers.
Are both correct?
If not, why can't "display" be implied after mothers as in "From their early days, baby monkeys display the same social behavior as their mothers (display)? Since social behavior can not be logically compared to mothers, so the only logical alternative is to have a verb after mothers. Hence, there is no ambiguity if "display" is ellipsed. What is wrong with this thought process?