Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 17:40 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 17:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Swagatalakshmi
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Last visit: 23 Jun 2013
Posts: 432
Own Kudos:
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 432
Kudos: 1,120
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
trivikram
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Last visit: 25 May 2018
Posts: 669
Own Kudos:
Posts: 669
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
joinforum
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Last visit: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Posts: 36
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ak_idc
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Last visit: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 546
Own Kudos:
Posts: 546
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Swagatalakshmi
Between 1950 and 1965, the federal government spent one-third more on research and development than industry did from its own funds. In 1980, for the first time, industry spent more on research and devlopment than the federal government did. Repsentatives of the industry claim tha these statistics show and increased commitment on the part of the industry to develop competitive products.

Which of the following of true, would help to refute the claim of the representatives of the industry?

A. In 1980, the federal government spent half as much on research and devlopment as it spent in 1965.

I would go with A. It is possible that industry did not increase its commitment, but federal government reduced its commitment of funds, and hence Industry's figures look impressive.


B. Between 1965 and 1980, industry in the United States experienced increasing competition from industry in other countries.
C. In 1979, the federal government shiftes research allocations from pharmaceitical to electronics.
D. Since 1965, industry has developed major product innovations, such as the personal computer.
E. Before 1985, money spent by industry on research and development was not taxed by the federal government.

Please provide a suitable explanation for your answer.
User avatar
tennis1ball
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Last visit: 18 Mar 2008
Posts: 650
Own Kudos:
Posts: 650
Kudos: 996
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Straight A for this one.
User avatar
arjsingh1976
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Last visit: 08 Sep 2007
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
Posts: 242
Kudos: 124
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ak_idc
Swagatalakshmi
Between 1950 and 1965, the federal government spent one-third more on research and development than industry did from its own funds. In 1980, for the first time, industry spent more on research and devlopment than the federal government did. Repsentatives of the industry claim tha these statistics show and increased commitment on the part of the industry to develop competitive products.

Which of the following of true, would help to refute the claim of the representatives of the industry?

A. In 1980, the federal government spent half as much on research and devlopment as it spent in 1965.

I would go with A. It is possible that industry did not increase its commitment, but federal government reduced its commitment of funds, and hence Industry's figures look impressive.


B. Between 1965 and 1980, industry in the United States experienced increasing competition from industry in other countries.
C. In 1979, the federal government shiftes research allocations from pharmaceitical to electronics.
D. Since 1965, industry has developed major product innovations, such as the personal computer.
E. Before 1985, money spent by industry on research and development was not taxed by the federal government.

Please provide a suitable explanation for your answer.


Yes A . Nice explaination ak!
User avatar
AK
Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Last visit: 11 Jan 2008
Posts: 179
Own Kudos:
Posts: 179
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Agree A
User avatar
baski6
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Last visit: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 371
Own Kudos:
Posts: 371
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ak_idc
Swagatalakshmi
Between 1950 and 1965, the federal government spent one-third more on research and development than industry did from its own funds. In 1980, for the first time, industry spent more on research and devlopment than the federal government did. Repsentatives of the industry claim tha these statistics show and increased commitment on the part of the industry to develop competitive products.

Which of the following of true, would help to refute the claim of the representatives of the industry?

A. In 1980, the federal government spent half as much on research and devlopment as it spent in 1965.

I would go with A. It is possible that industry did not increase its commitment, but federal government reduced its commitment of funds, and hence Industry's figures look impressive.


B. Between 1965 and 1980, industry in the United States experienced increasing competition from industry in other countries.
C. In 1979, the federal government shiftes research allocations from pharmaceitical to electronics.
D. Since 1965, industry has developed major product innovations, such as the personal computer.
E. Before 1985, money spent by industry on research and development was not taxed by the federal government.

Please provide a suitable explanation for your answer.




A - Great explanation.
User avatar
ncp
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Last visit: 13 Feb 2023
Posts: 1,414
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Ann Arbor
Concentration: Health Care Marketing
Schools:Ross '10
Posts: 1,414
Kudos: 325
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My opinion is also A.

However, I applied some math to the problem.

Between 1950 & 1965

Industry spent I dollars
Government spent 4I/3 dollars.

According to A, government spent half of what it spent. So updated spending by government is 4I/3 *(1/2) = 2I/3.

This is less than what the industry spent, even if the industry spent the same I dollars instead of increased commitment.

Thus, the answer is A.
User avatar
joinforum
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Last visit: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Posts: 36
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ak_idc
Swagatalakshmi
Between 1950 and 1965, the federal government spent one-third more on research and development than industry did from its own funds. In 1980, for the first time, industry spent more on research and devlopment than the federal government did. Repsentatives of the industry claim tha these statistics show and increased commitment on the part of the industry to develop competitive products.

Which of the following of true, would help to refute the claim of the representatives of the industry?

A. In 1980, the federal government spent half as much on research and devlopment as it spent in 1965.

I would go with A. It is possible that industry did not increase its commitment, but federal government reduced its commitment of funds, and hence Industry's figures look impressive.


B. Between 1965 and 1980, industry in the United States experienced increasing competition from industry in other countries.
C. In 1979, the federal government shiftes research allocations from pharmaceitical to electronics.
D. Since 1965, industry has developed major product innovations, such as the personal computer.
E. Before 1985, money spent by industry on research and development was not taxed by the federal government.

Please provide a suitable explanation for your answer.


Isn't the question about the claim?And the claim is :increased commitment on the part of the industry to develop competitive products.
User avatar
ivymba
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Last visit: 13 Jun 2013
Posts: 199
Own Kudos:
Location: TX
Posts: 199
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
arjsingh1976
ak_idc
Swagatalakshmi
Between 1950 and 1965, the federal government spent one-third more on research and development than industry did from its own funds. In 1980, for the first time, industry spent more on research and devlopment than the federal government did. Repsentatives of the industry claim tha these statistics show and increased commitment on the part of the industry to develop competitive products.

Which of the following of true, would help to refute the claim of the representatives of the industry?

A. In 1980, the federal government spent half as much on research and devlopment as it spent in 1965.

I would go with A. It is possible that industry did not increase its commitment, but federal government reduced its commitment of funds, and hence Industry's figures look impressive.


B. Between 1965 and 1980, industry in the United States experienced increasing competition from industry in other countries.
C. In 1979, the federal government shiftes research allocations from pharmaceitical to electronics.
D. Since 1965, industry has developed major product innovations, such as the personal computer.
E. Before 1985, money spent by industry on research and development was not taxed by the federal government.

Please provide a suitable explanation for your answer.

Yes A . Nice explaination ak!


Good Catch arjsingh1976 !!!
User avatar
Swagatalakshmi
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Last visit: 23 Jun 2013
Posts: 432
Own Kudos:
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 432
Kudos: 1,120
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA=A
User avatar
ak_idc
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Last visit: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 546
Own Kudos:
Posts: 546
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
joinforum
ak_idc
Swagatalakshmi
Between 1950 and 1965, the federal government spent one-third more on research and development than industry did from its own funds. In 1980, for the first time, industry spent more on research and devlopment than the federal government did. Repsentatives of the industry claim tha these statistics show and increased commitment on the part of the industry to develop competitive products.

Which of the following of true, would help to refute the claim of the representatives of the industry?

A. In 1980, the federal government spent half as much on research and devlopment as it spent in 1965.

I would go with A. It is possible that industry did not increase its commitment, but federal government reduced its commitment of funds, and hence Industry's figures look impressive.


B. Between 1965 and 1980, industry in the United States experienced increasing competition from industry in other countries.
C. In 1979, the federal government shiftes research allocations from pharmaceitical to electronics.
D. Since 1965, industry has developed major product innovations, such as the personal computer.
E. Before 1985, money spent by industry on research and development was not taxed by the federal government.

Please provide a suitable explanation for your answer.

Isn't the question about the claim?And the claim is :increased commitment on the part of the industry to develop competitive products.


Yes. It is about the claim. And A helps us in refuting that claim by saying that R&D expenditure of Industry did nt increase, and the claim that their commitment increased is wrong.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts