GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Jul 2018, 22:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

6 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Posts: 57
Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2005, 16:57
6
1
15
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

63% (01:50) correct 37% (01:51) wrong based on 1113 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on property. In place of this system, the city plans to introduce a sales tax of three percent on all retail sales in the city. Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes. The critics are correct on this point. Nevertheless, implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca's schools. Several large retailers have selected Aroca City as the site for huge new stores, and these are certain to draw large numbers of shoppers from neighboring municipalities, where sales are taxed at rates of six percent and more. In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.

In the argument given, the two potions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is an objection that has been raised against a certain plan; the second is a prediction that, if accurate, undermines the force of that objection.

(B) The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is a point the argument makes in favor of adopting an alternative plan.

(C) The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is the main reason cited by the argument for its endorsement of the criticism.

(D) The first is a claim that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main point used by the argument to show that the claim is false.

(E) The first is a claim that the argument accepts with certain reservations; the second presents that claim in a rewarding that is not subject to those reservations
Most Helpful Community Reply
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 137
Location: Boston,MA
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 17 Apr 2017, 22:04
2
9
Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on property. In place of this system, the city plans to introduce a sales tax of three percent on all retail sales in the city.Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes. The critics are correct on this point. Nevertheless, implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools. Several large retailers have selected Aroca City as the site for huge new stores, and these are certain to draw large numbers of shoppers from neighboring municipalities, where sales are taxed at rates of six percent and more. In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.

In the argument given, the two potions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is an objection that has been raised against a certain plan; the second is a prediction that, if accurate, undermines the force of that objection.
(B) The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is a point the argument makes in favor of adopting an alternative plan.
(C) The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is the main reason cited by the argument for its endorsement of the criticism.
(D) The first is a claim that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main point used by the argument to show that the claim is false.
(E) The first is a claim that the argument accepts with certain reservations; the second presents that claim in a rewarding that is not subject to those reservations.
_________________

--gregspirited


Originally posted by gregspirited on 21 Dec 2007, 09:06.
Last edited by hazelnut on 17 Apr 2017, 22:04, edited 3 times in total.
OA updated
General Discussion
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 830
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2005, 18:55
I will go with D
B, C & E - can be eliminated because the first BF is not endorsed/accepted by the argument.
Between A & D - A can be eliminated because the second BF is not a prediction it is the conclusion of the argument - 'In consequence' is the clue here.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 310
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2005, 20:39
D for me. Same reasons as Rathod.

GA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 102
Location: Austin, Texas
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2005, 20:55
rthothad wrote:
I will go with D
B, C & E - can be eliminated because the first BF is not endorsed/accepted by the argument.
Between A & D - A can be eliminated because the second BF is not a prediction it is the conclusion of the argument - 'In consequence' is the clue here.


I vote (A). The second boldface is indeed a prediction of the future: "retail sales are bound to increase". And if that prediction is true, that fact undermines the objection in the first boldface. Just as answer choice (A) says.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1406
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2005, 20:56
I will take "A"....author admits that critics point is valid by saying "The critics are correct on this point. ", so I think "D" is out.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 153
Location: Atlanta , GA
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2005, 20:57
Between A and D I will go with A .
because first is an objection to the plan and the second one is a prediction
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2491
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2007, 23:35
gregspirited wrote:
Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on property. In place of this system, the city plans to introduce a sales tax of three percent on all retail sales in the city.Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes. The critics are correct on this point. Nevertheless,implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools.Several large retailers have selected Aroca City as the site for huge new stores, and these are certain to draw large numbers of shoppers from neighboring municipalities, where sales are taxed at rates of six percent and more. In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.

In the argument given, the two potions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is an objection that has been raised against a certain plan; the second is a prediction that, if accurate, undermines the force of that objection.
B. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is a point the argument makes in favor of adopting an alternative plan.
C. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is the main reason cited by the argument for its endorsement of the criticism.
D. The first is a claim that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main point used by the argument to show that the claim is false.
E. The first is a claim that the argument accepts with certain reservations; the second presents that claim in a rewarding that is not subject to those reservations.


I say A. b/c the first is an objection to the plan and the second undermines that plan.

B: no alternate plan given
C: the second is not criticism
D: close but not correct b/c the first is not a claim, the first is a true statement.
E: no reservation of accepting the claim is presented.

If not A then D, D is very close but I still think A is a better choice.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1063
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Dec 2007, 09:19
[quote="gregspirited"]Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on property. In place of this system, the city plans to introduce a sales tax of three percent on all retail sales in the city.Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes. The critics are correct on this point. Nevertheless,implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools.Several large retailers have selected Aroca City as the site for huge new stores, and these are certain to draw large numbers of shoppers from neighboring municipalities, where sales are taxed at rates of six percent and more. In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.

In the argument given, the two potions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is an objection that has been raised against a certain plan; the second is a prediction that, if accurate, undermines the force of that objection.
B. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is a point the argument makes in favor of adopting an alternative plan.
C. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is the main reason cited by the argument for its endorsement of the criticism.
D. The first is a claim that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main point used by the argument to show that the claim is false.
E. The first is a claim that the argument accepts with certain reservations; the second presents that claim in a rewarding that is not subject to those reservations.


A??? the possibility of an increase of retail sales undermines the first criticism...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 137
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2008, 14:29
I think A is the best choice. However, D is close.


marcodonzelli wrote:
gregspirited wrote:
Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on property. In place of this system, the city plans to introduce a sales tax of three percent on all retail sales in the city.Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes. The critics are correct on this point. Nevertheless,implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools.Several large retailers have selected Aroca City as the site for huge new stores, and these are certain to draw large numbers of shoppers from neighboring municipalities, where sales are taxed at rates of six percent and more. In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.

In the argument given, the two potions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is an objection that has been raised against a certain plan; the second is a prediction that, if accurate, undermines the force of that objection.
B. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is a point the argument makes in favor of adopting an alternative plan.
C. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is the main reason cited by the argument for its endorsement of the criticism.
D. The first is a claim that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main point used by the argument to show that the claim is false.
E. The first is a claim that the argument accepts with certain reservations; the second presents that claim in a rewarding that is not subject to those reservations.


A??? the possibility of an increase of retail sales undermines the first criticism...
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 88
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2008, 06:07
1
I would go for A

the reason I think D isn;t correct because its not the main point used by arguement.. main point used by an arguement to prove itself is something that supports it.. the second BF is itself a conclusion..

wats the OA
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 113
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2008, 09:47
i got for D too.

A is too general, and i think it would be easier to ignore all the asnwer choices that do not agreee with the second statement being the conclusion of the entire argument. C comes close enough, but the first part is incorrect. Only D satisfies the argument as a whole. That's my take on this kind of questions. Find one that is the easiest to spot and eliminate the rest. you have a better chance to get the answer right.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1425
Schools: Chicago Booth '11
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2008, 11:36
A


D is wrong because the claim is not false as D states, he beleives the claim by itself, he just doesnt support it because it is not taking into account the new retail stores.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 279
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2008, 07:59
A good debate should be how do we elliminate A or D. Even though I would have picked A but I do not know how to elliminate D.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 751
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2008, 02:02
The bold face arguments are tricky. First need to know the conclusion of the argument and how the bold face arguments relates to the conclusion.

Conclusion: (2 nd bold face argument: In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.
First bold face argument is an objection that points out new plan won’t generate same amount as old plan.


In the argument given, the two potions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is an objection that has been raised against a certain plan; the second is a prediction that, if accurate, undermines the force of that objection. [First: is Criticism, Second: Actual Conclusion – Hold it]

B. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is a point the argument makes in favor of adopting an alternative plan. [First: is Criticism, Second: Actual Conclusion – Eliminate it]

C. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is the main reason cited by the argument for its endorsement of the criticism. [First: is Criticism, Second: Actual Conclusion – Eliminate it]


D. The first is a claim that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main point used by the argument to show that the claim is false. [First: is Criticism, Second: Actual Conclusion – Eliminate it]

E. The first is a claim that the argument accepts with certain reservations; the second presents that claim in a rewarding that is not subject to those reservations. [First: is Criticism, Second: Actual Conclusion – Eliminate it]

Answer: A
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 142
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2008, 09:13
gregspirited wrote:
Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on property. In place of this system, the city plans to introduce a sales tax of three percent on all retail sales in the city.Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes. The critics are correct on this point. Nevertheless,implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools.Several large retailers have selected Aroca City as the site for huge new stores, and these are certain to draw large numbers of shoppers from neighboring municipalities, where sales are taxed at rates of six percent and more. In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.

In the argument given, the two potions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is an objection that has been raised against a certain plan; the second is a prediction that, if accurate, undermines the force of that objection.
B. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is a point the argument makes in favor of adopting an alternative plan.
C. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is the main reason cited by the argument for its endorsement of the criticism.
D. The first is a claim that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main point used by the argument to show that the claim is false.
E. The first is a claim that the argument accepts with certain reservations; the second presents that claim in a rewarding that is not subject to those reservations.


D can be eliminated because the argument doesnt refute the claim raised by the critics. The argument in fact endorses the view point of the critics by saying that the critics are correct on this point.
_________________

Neelabh Mahesh

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1783
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2008, 18:25
Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on property. In place of this system, the city plans to introduce a sales tax of three percent on all retail sales in the city. Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes. The critics are correct on this point. Nevertheless, implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools. Several large retailers have selected Aroca City as the site for huge new stores, and these are certain to draw large numbers of shoppers from neighboring municipalities, where sales are taxed at rates of six percent and more. In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.

In the argument given, the two potions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is an objection that has been raised against a certain plan; the second is a prediction that, if accurate, undermines the force of that objection.
B. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is a point the argument makes in favor of adopting an alternative plan.
C. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is the main reason cited by the argument for its endorsement of the criticism.
D. The first is a claim that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main point used by the argument to show that the claim is false.
E. The first is a claim that the argument accepts with certain reservations; the second presents that claim in a rewarding that is not subject to those reservations.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1482
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jun 2008, 14:09
you know, i was thinking about E as well, but I didnt understand the second part of the sentence ... especially the 'rewarding' bit
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1783
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2008, 03:23
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 737
Location: Oxford
Schools: Oxford'10
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2008, 03:30
sondenso wrote:
But OA is not E :lol:

got me again

rite, i need to :snipersmile: boldfaces
Re: Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert   [#permalink] 04 Jun 2008, 03:30

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 49 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on propert

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.