Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
"He also includes a chapter on his native Australia which , he concludes , is able but unwilling to stop inflows of iffy money from China and Papua New Guinea. "
Can someone explain the which clause and how the he concludes is put inside it with what role ?
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
In all seriousness: experts on English grammar and style often disagree with each other, even under the best of circumstances. The GMAT has decided that it cares about a certain set of grammar rules, and it interprets those rules in a particular way; the editors of the Economist (my favorite magazine, fwiw) don't always agree with the writers of the GMAT.
In other words: to learn the GMAT's SC rules, you'll want to stick with GMAT sentences. The Economist won't necessarily apply rules in the same way as the GMAT -- so don't worry about those sentences at all.
Thanks a ton .. one thing is I was reading the economist to get rid of one issue I m struggling very much with. That's is the meaning issue in SC under time pressure . I was trying to use economist for that . Any other source for that issue ??
I would definitely agree that it's a GREAT long-term habit to read high-quality writing for an hour or two every night. More exposure to good writing will inevitably help you better at everything on the GMAT verbal section.
The only trouble is, reading something like the Economist or any number of other publications (Scientific American, Atlantic, New Yorker, New York Times, academic journals, etc.) is a long-term strategy. It's a great way to strengthen your fundamental reading skills (which will definitely help with CR & RC), and maybe make you a little bit better at distinguishing between shades of meaning in different sentences (which should also help with SC). But that's a slow process. It's worthwhile if you're going to be studying for a while, but it won't necessarily pay off quickly.
And for SC, the GMAT tests its own version of the English language. There are absolutely zero publications out there that follow the exact same rules as GMAT SC does. The English language is constantly evolving and changing, and two different editors will inevitably have different opinions about the rules that are tested on the GMAT.
So reading is definitely good! But no single publication can be taken as an authoritative proxy for GMAT SC rules, unfortunately.
In GMAT SC, which is followed by a comma as it shows that it is a non-essential modifier that adds some information to a sentence but if removed it does not make much difference.
GMAT Ninja Is there any possibility in a GMAT sentence when 'which' is not preceded by a comma? (as in the above sentence from economist)
If you have a phrase with "which" preceded by a preposition of some sort ("in which", "to which", etc.), then there won't be a comma. Otherwise, "which" will generally be preceded by a comma.
The GMAT doesn't really test comma usage much, though. Editors and style experts have plenty of reasonable disagreements about when commas should or shouldn't be used -- and the GMAT mostly stays away from the issue. I can't think of any GMAT questions in which the comma (or lack thereof) is a deciding factor.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.