Last visit was: 23 Jan 2025, 11:46 It is currently 23 Jan 2025, 11:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 22 Jan 2025
Posts: 3,117
Own Kudos:
7,449
 [208]
Given Kudos: 1,860
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Products:
Posts: 3,117
Kudos: 7,449
 [208]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
202
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 03 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,297
Own Kudos:
1,860
 [63]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,297
Kudos: 1,860
 [63]
24
Kudos
Add Kudos
39
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 3,021
Own Kudos:
7,366
 [34]
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert reply
Posts: 3,021
Kudos: 7,366
 [34]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 22 Jan 2025
Posts: 3,117
Own Kudos:
7,449
 [32]
Given Kudos: 1,860
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Products:
Posts: 3,117
Kudos: 7,449
 [32]
17
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatophobia
Bob expected to spend a total of \($9.00\) to buy a given amount of pasta salad at a fixed price per pound. However, the price of the salad was \($0.20\) more per pound than Bob had expected. Consequently, he spent \($9.00\) and bought \(\frac{1}{2}\) pound less of the salad. How much did Bob spend per pound for the salad?

A. \($1.80 \)

B. \($1.85 \)

C. \($1.90 \)

D. \($1.95 \)

E. \($2.00 \)

We can use the options and work backward to solve this question. Let's calculate the expected price from the actual price as shown below -

Attachment:
Screenshot 2023-11-18 194320.png
Screenshot 2023-11-18 194320.png [ 54.72 KiB | Viewed 47880 times ]

I would start with Option E, as the numbers seem more friendly.

Expected Quantity (in pounds) = \(\frac{\text{9}}{\text{Expected Price}}\)

Actual Quantity (in pounds) = Expected Quantity - 0.5

The product of Actual Quantity and Actual Price should be equal to $9. As we see Option E matches. We need not test out any other options.

Attachment:
Screenshot 2023-11-18 194412.png
Screenshot 2023-11-18 194412.png [ 66.86 KiB | Viewed 44976 times ]
General Discussion
User avatar
GMATCenturion
Joined: 07 May 2023
Last visit: 16 Jan 2025
Posts: 274
Own Kudos:
333
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 274
Kudos: 333
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avigutman - Can you please share a reasoning based approach to this question.
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 22 Jan 2025
Posts: 1,342
Own Kudos:
3,464
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert reply
Posts: 1,342
Kudos: 3,464
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatophobia
Bob expected to spend a total of \($9.00\) to buy a given amount of pasta salad at a fixed price per pound. However, the price of the salad was \($0.20\) more per pound than Bob had expected. Consequently, he spent \($9.00\) and bought \(\frac{1}{2}\) pound less of the salad. How much did Bob spend per pound for the salad?

A. \($1.80 \)

B. \($1.85 \)

C. \($1.90 \)

D. \($1.95 \)

E. \($2.00 \)
The actual price per pound and the expected price per pound yield two weights that are 1/2 pound apart.
Implication:
It is extremely likely that -- when divided into the paid amount of 900 cents -- one price-per-pound will yield a weight that is an INTEGER value, while the other yields a weight that is 0.5 MORE than an integer value.

We can PLUG IN THE ANSWERS, which represent the actual price per pound.
When divided into 900 cents, options B, C and D -- 185 cents, 190 cents, and 195 cents -- will yield neither an integer value nor 0.5 more than an integer value.

Option A implies an expected price of 160 cents per pound, 20 cents less than the actual price per pound (180 cents).
When divided into 900 cents, 160 will yield neither an integer value nor 0.5 more than an integer value.
The correct answer is almost certain to be E.

E: Actual price = 200 cents per pound, expected price = 180 cents per pound
Weight purchased at the actual price \(= \frac{900-cents}{200-cents-per-pound} = 4.5\) pounds
Weight that would have been purchased at the expeced price \(= \frac{900-cents}{180-cents-per-pound} = 5\) pounds
Success!
The actual weight is 0.5 pound less than the expected weight.

­
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 23 Jan 2025
Posts: 5,508
Own Kudos:
4,785
 [3]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,508
Kudos: 4,785
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatophobia

Given: Bob expected to spend a total of \($9.00\) to buy a given amount of pasta salad at a fixed price per pound. However, the price of the salad was \($0.20\) more per pound than Bob had expected. Consequently, he spent \($9.00\) and bought \(\frac{1}{2}\) pound less of the salad.

Asked: How much did Bob spend per pound for the salad?

Let us assume that Bob spent $x per pound for the salad

Bob expected to purchase = $9/(x-.2) pounds
$9 = x ($9/(x-.2) - .5) = 9x/(x-.2) - .5x
9(x-.2) = 9x - .5x(x-.2)
-1.8 = -.5x^2 + .1x
5x^2 - x - 18 = 0
5x^2 - 10x + 9x - 18 = 0
5x(x-2) + 9(x-2) = 0
(5x+9)(x-2) = 0
x = 2 since x = -9/5 is not feasible

IMO E
User avatar
ruis
Joined: 17 Sep 2023
Last visit: 03 Nov 2024
Posts: 140
Own Kudos:
353
 [4]
Given Kudos: 528
Posts: 140
Kudos: 353
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avigutman
Obscurus
avigutman - Can you please share a reasoning based approach to this question.
Obscurus this is a rare question type for which you either have to solve a quadratic equation (which I don't recommend) or use the answer choices (the better approach in my opinion). Firstly, how to recognize this question type?

When you have the product of two positive numbers (a and b), and you're told that the same product can be reached by adding to one of the numbers and subtracting from the other [(a+x)(b-y), where x and y are positive numbers]. Importantly, we don't know the ratio a:(a+x) nor b:(b-y). If we do know one of those ratios, we can solve using a beautiful reasoning based solution.

Some other official questions in this rare category:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-store-curr ... 44780.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-boat-trave ... ml#p778643
https://gmatclub.com/forum/at-his-regul ... 36642.html

The non-integer answer choices make this particular problem more challenging (similar to the boat problem) but we know that the GMAT isn't all that interested in testing our ability to do lots of complicated math in a 2-minute-per-question setting, so it's likely that the answer choice that's easiest to check is the correct answer choice (as is the case in both the boat question and this question).

How I approached this problem: the answer choices represent Bob's cost/pound, and I know he expected to spend 20 cents less than that. Which answer choice is easiest to subtract 20 cents from? Well, (E) looks good to me because it's easy to divide $9 by $2, and also "20 cents less" is exactly 10% below. In other words, he expected to spend 9/10 as much as he did, so he would've been able to buy 10/9 as many pounds if the price were as he expected it to be (this is me using ratios for a beautiful reasoning-based approach).

At $2/pound he bought 4.5 pounds, and 10/9 of 4.5 pounds is exactly 5 pounds - that's the 1/2 pound difference that we were expecting. Done!

Can you imagine having to divide $9 by any of the other answer choices?? It's unlikely that we'd have to do that on the GMAT (unless that was the entire question).

Thank you very much for this super explanation! I followed the same rationale however once I got 4,5 pounds and 5 pounds respectively, I did not recognize that the 0,5 difference was the 1/2 pounds less... I am still struggling with it as I am looking at it as "4,5 is not the half of 5". Apologies as I must be asking sth pretty obvious but I am unable to see the error in my rationale.
Thanks again :)
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,903
Own Kudos:
696,097
 [1]
Given Kudos: 91,888
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,903
Kudos: 696,097
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ruis
avigutman
Obscurus
avigutman - Can you please share a reasoning based approach to this question.
Obscurus this is a rare question type for which you either have to solve a quadratic equation (which I don't recommend) or use the answer choices (the better approach in my opinion). Firstly, how to recognize this question type?

When you have the product of two positive numbers (a and b), and you're told that the same product can be reached by adding to one of the numbers and subtracting from the other [(a+x)(b-y), where x and y are positive numbers]. Importantly, we don't know the ratio a:(a+x) nor b:(b-y). If we do know one of those ratios, we can solve using a beautiful reasoning based solution.

Some other official questions in this rare category:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-store-curr ... 44780.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-boat-trave ... ml#p778643
https://gmatclub.com/forum/at-his-regul ... 36642.html

The non-integer answer choices make this particular problem more challenging (similar to the boat problem) but we know that the GMAT isn't all that interested in testing our ability to do lots of complicated math in a 2-minute-per-question setting, so it's likely that the answer choice that's easiest to check is the correct answer choice (as is the case in both the boat question and this question).

How I approached this problem: the answer choices represent Bob's cost/pound, and I know he expected to spend 20 cents less than that. Which answer choice is easiest to subtract 20 cents from? Well, (E) looks good to me because it's easy to divide $9 by $2, and also "20 cents less" is exactly 10% below. In other words, he expected to spend 9/10 as much as he did, so he would've been able to buy 10/9 as many pounds if the price were as he expected it to be (this is me using ratios for a beautiful reasoning-based approach).

At $2/pound he bought 4.5 pounds, and 10/9 of 4.5 pounds is exactly 5 pounds - that's the 1/2 pound difference that we were expecting. Done!

Can you imagine having to divide $9 by any of the other answer choices?? It's unlikely that we'd have to do that on the GMAT (unless that was the entire question).

Thank you very much for this super explanation! I followed the same rationale however once I got 4,5 pounds and 5 pounds respectively, I did not recognize that the 0,5 difference was the 1/2 pounds less... I am still struggling with it as I am looking at it as "4,5 is not the half of 5". Apologies as I must be asking sth pretty obvious but I am unable to see the error in my rationale.
Thanks again :)

"1/2 pound less" does not mean half as much. So, it's not dividing by 2; it's subtracting 1/2.
User avatar
Honeybadger269
Joined: 06 May 2023
Last visit: 05 Dec 2024
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avigutman
Obscurus
avigutman - Can you please share a reasoning based approach to this question.
Obscurus this is a rare question type for which you either have to solve a quadratic equation (which I don't recommend) or use the answer choices (the better approach in my opinion). Firstly, how to recognize this question type?

When you have the product of two positive numbers (a and b), and you're told that the same product can be reached by adding to one of the numbers and subtracting from the other [(a+[i]x)(b-y), where x and y are positive numbers]. Importantly, we don't know the ratio a:(a+x) nor b:(b-y). If we do know one of those ratios, we can solve using a beautiful reasoning based solution.

Some other official questions in this rare category:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-store-curr ... 44780.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-boat-trave ... ml#p778643
https://gmatclub.com/forum/at-his-regul ... 36642.html

The non-integer answer choices make this particular problem more challenging (similar to the boat problem) but we know that the GMAT isn't all that interested in testing our ability to do lots of complicated math in a 2-minute-per-question setting, so it's likely that the answer choice that's easiest to check is the correct answer choice (as is the case in both the boat question and this question).

How I approached this problem: the answer choices represent Bob's cost/pound, and I know he expected to spend 20 cents less than that. Which answer choice is easiest to subtract 20 cents from? Well, (E) looks good to me because it's easy to divide $9 by $2, and also "20 cents less" is exactly 10% below. In other words, he expected to spend 9/10 as much as he did, so he would've been able to buy 10/9 as many pounds if the price were as he expected it to be (this is me using ratios for a beautiful reasoning-based approach).

At $2/pound he bought 4.5 pounds, and 10/9 of 4.5 pounds is exactly 5 pounds - that's the 1/2 pound difference that we were expecting. Done!

Can you imagine having to divide $9 by any of the other answer choices?? It's unlikely that we'd have to do that on the GMAT (unless that was the entire question).
­Highly elegant and intricate explanation.

Are there people who a] are not naturally good at 'math' and b] have learnt to think and execute this stuff within the time constraints and under the exam pressure by way of GMAT preparation? If yes, please reply to this and tell me how you developed this skill. I have been preparing for the test for a long time and still can never do this in any mock or actual attempt.

 
User avatar
einstein801
Joined: 23 Jan 2024
Last visit: 13 Jan 2025
Posts: 184
Own Kudos:
97
 [1]
Given Kudos: 138
Posts: 184
Kudos: 97
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is wrong. should be 5x^2 +x - 18
Kinshook
gmatophobia

Given: Bob expected to spend a total of \($9.00\) to buy a given amount of pasta salad at a fixed price per pound. However, the price of the salad was \($0.20\) more per pound than Bob had expected. Consequently, he spent \($9.00\) and bought \(\frac{1}{2}\) pound less of the salad.

Asked: How much did Bob spend per pound for the salad?

Let us assume that Bob spent $x per pound for the salad

Bob expected to purchase = $9/(x-.2) pounds
$9 = x ($9/(x-.2) - .5) = 9x/(x-.2) - .5x
9(x-.2) = 9x - .5x(x-.2)
-1.8 = -.5x^2 + .1x
5x^2 - x - 18 = 0
5x^2 - 10x + 9x - 18 = 0
5x(x-2) + 9(x-2) = 0
(5x+9)(x-2) = 0
x = 2 since x = -9/5 is not feasible

IMO E
­
User avatar
GMATCoachBen
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Last visit: 23 Jan 2025
Posts: 423
Own Kudos:
1,789
 [2]
Given Kudos: 205
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Posts: 423
Kudos: 1,789
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Honeybadger269
avigutman
Obscurus
avigutman - Can you please share a reasoning based approach to this question.
Obscurus this is a rare question type for which you either have to solve a quadratic equation (which I don't recommend) or use the answer choices (the better approach in my opinion). Firstly, how to recognize this question type?

When you have the product of two positive numbers (a and b), and you're told that the same product can be reached by adding to one of the numbers and subtracting from the other [(a+[i]x)(b-y), where x and y are positive numbers]. Importantly, we don't know the ratio a :(a+x) nor b :(b-y). If we do know one of those ratios, we can solve using a beautiful reasoning based solution.

Some other official questions in this rare category:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-store-curr ... 44780.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-boat-trave ... ml#p778643
https://gmatclub.com/forum/at-his-regul ... 36642.html

The non-integer answer choices make this particular problem more challenging (similar to the boat problem) but we know that the GMAT isn't all that interested in testing our ability to do lots of complicated math in a 2-minute-per-question setting, so it's likely that the answer choice that's easiest to check is the correct answer choice (as is the case in both the boat question and this question).

How I approached this problem: the answer choices represent Bob's cost/pound, and I know he expected to spend 20 cents less than that. Which answer choice is easiest to subtract 20 cents from? Well, (E) looks good to me because it's easy to divide $9 by $2, and also "20 cents less" is exactly 10% below. In other words, he expected to spend 9/10 as much as he did, so he would've been able to buy 10/9 as many pounds if the price were as he expected it to be (this is me using ratios for a beautiful reasoning-based approach).

At $2/pound he bought 4.5 pounds, and 10/9 of 4.5 pounds is exactly 5 pounds - that's the 1/2 pound difference that we were expecting. Done!

Can you imagine having to divide $9 by any of the other answer choices?? It's unlikely that we'd have to do that on the GMAT (unless that was the entire question).
­Highly elegant and intricate explanation.

Are there people who a] are not naturally good at 'math' and b] have learnt to think and execute this stuff within the time constraints and under the exam pressure by way of GMAT preparation? If yes, please reply to this and tell me how you developed this skill. I have been preparing for the test for a long time and still can never do this in any mock or actual attempt.







 
­Yes, this is a great explanation by avigutman!

Honeybadger269 These quadratics do come up sometimes, often with this kind of wording, where a price goes up or down and the quantity goes in the other direction. It's usually easiest to backsolve from the answer choices, since you'd have to guess and check anyways to do the factoring.

Easier said than done, but thorough preparation helps a lot, so we don't have to recreate the wheel on the actual test: once we've done several of these problems, it helps us quickly recognize this wording and make it a habit to use the answer choices to our advantage. Remember to first test the answer choice that is easiest to test; this boat one is a great example: 

https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-boat-trave ... ml#p778643­
User avatar
stephaniepongracz
Joined: 29 Mar 2024
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please help me:

Would it also be possible to say:
p=price
n=weight

p*(n-0.5) = (p-0.2)*n
pn-0.5p = pn-0.2n
0.5p = 0.2n
5/2p = n

Then try out "p=2" --> 5/2*2=5 and 5/2*1.8=4.5 which is correct

I just dont understand why exactly that is right, can anyone explain please?­
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,903
Own Kudos:
696,097
 [1]
Given Kudos: 91,888
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,903
Kudos: 696,097
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
stephaniepongracz
Bob expected to spend a total of $9.00 to buy a given amount of pasta salad at a fixed price per pound. However, the price of the salad was $0.20 more per pound than Bob had expected. Consequently, he spent $9.00 and bought \(\frac{1}{2}\) pound less of the salad. How much did Bob spend per pound for the salad?

A. $1.80
B. $1.85
C. $1.90
D. $1.95
E. $2.00­

Please help me:

Would it also be possible to say:
p=price
n=weight

p*(n-0.5) = (p-0.2)*n
pn-0.5p = pn-0.2n
0.5p = 0.2n
5/2p = n

Then try out "p=2" --> 5/2*2=5 and 5/2*1.8=4.5 which is correct

I just dont understand why exactly that is right, can anyone explain please?­
­You should clearly state what the variables represent.

If p is the old price, and n is the weight of the salad Bob could have bought at that price, then we'd get: pn = (p + 0.2)(n - 0.5) = 9

If p is the new price, and n is the weight of the salad Bob bought at that price, then we'd get: pn = (p - 0.2)(n + 0.5) = 9.

You could have used only one variable p to denote the new price per pound to get: 9/p = 9/(p - 0.2) - 0.5, which gives n = 2.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Jan 2025
Posts: 15,677
Own Kudos:
71,220
 [4]
Given Kudos: 452
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,677
Kudos: 71,220
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
gmatophobia
Bob expected to spend a total of $9.00 to buy a given amount of pasta salad at a fixed price per pound. However, the price of the salad was $0.20 more per pound than Bob had expected. Consequently, he spent $9.00 and bought \(\frac{1}{2}\) pound less of the salad. How much did Bob spend per pound for the salad?

A. $1.80
B. $1.85
C. $1.90
D. $1.95
E. $2.00
­
One of the question types in which I would use variables and equations to get to the quadratic and then plug in values. Just using reasoning from options straight away might lead to a lot of time wasted with high possibility of calculation errors. 

Whatever you are asked to find, you should prefer to use that as a variable. So price he paid = p and weight he bought = w
pw = 9
Also, as per his initial expectation,

\((p - \frac{1}{5})(w + \frac{1}{2}) = 9\)

\(pw + \frac{p}{2} - \frac{w}{5} - \frac{1}{10} = 9\)

\(2w - 5p = 1\) (Eliminate w since we need the value of p)

\(\frac{18}{p} - 5p = 1\)  

Now plug in. I know that 18/p will likely be an integer so I will try 2 first. I get -1. Incorrect. 
Next try 1.8 because it will divide 18 evenly. I get 1. Valid.

Answer (A)

Avoiding calculations with variables in denominator is discussed here: 
https://anaprep.com/avoiding-calculatio ... nominator/­
User avatar
Keismith
Joined: 10 Aug 2024
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 5
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You can also solve it in an easier way involving single variable.

Assuming x is pound

9 = (9/x + 0.2)(x - 0.5)

simplify to

45 = 2x^2 - x

Thus x - 5

9/5 + 0.2 = 2
User avatar
hemanthPA
Joined: 09 Mar 2023
Last visit: 16 Jan 2025
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
12
 [3]
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 52
Kudos: 12
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatophobia
Bob expected to spend a total of $9.00 to buy a given amount of pasta salad at a fixed price per pound. However, the price of the salad was $0.20 more per pound than Bob had expected. Consequently, he spent $9.00 and bought \(\frac{1}{2}\) pound less of the salad. How much did Bob spend per pound for the salad?

A. $1.80
B. $1.85
C. $1.90
D. $1.95
E. $2.00

Hey folks, this right here is one of the most mentally challenging and time consuming and error prone problems, but dont worry, to every problem i can find a sweet simple solution which would expect one to use creative thinking, cause GMAT rewards creative thinking, not "structured approach", especially in the given time frame.

So well Here we go,

Given:
The total cost is fixed at $9.00.

Bob bought 1⁄2 pound less because the price per pound increased by $0.20.

Let p be price per pound

So he expected to get 9/p lb of pasta

But the actual amount he got was 9/p+0.2

He bought 1⁄2 lb less, so the difference between expected qty of pasta and actual quantity of pasta is 1⁄2

Which is
9/p – 9/p+0.2 = 1⁄2

Now let's check for what values of p would this equation hold, use options in AEBDC

p = 1.8


9/1.8 – 9/2 = 1⁄2

90/18-9/2 = 5-4.5 = 0.5

Hence p = 1.8

Now the question asks how much did he spend per pound of salad, which is 1.8+0.2 = $2


I dont think there's any solution out there as simple, effective and error free as this, this doesnt test your skills, rather comes to you if you visualize and the key part to visualize is the question, in this question its important we visualize the difference between expected qty of pasta and actual quantity of pasta, which would be our key towards unlocking the answer.


How do we visualize? Write down the given information and dumb it down.

violá, c'est ça!
User avatar
Subha1012
Joined: 09 Sep 2022
Last visit: 23 Jan 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
let's see,

What is Given:

  1. Bob expected the price per pound to be x.
  2. Bob actually paid x+0.20x per pound.
  3. Bob spent $9 total in both cases:
    • Expected pounds: 9/x
    • Actual pounds: 9\{x + 0.20}
  4. Bob bought 0.5 pounds less than expected due to the price increase:
    9/x - 9\{x + 0.20} = 0.5


now don't solve the equation, to save time, just put options (a,b,c,d,e) quickly and check.

you will see, option a. x=1.8 suits the best.

but but but , question is asking , how much bob actually paid (x+.20) not expected the price (x)

so answer will be (1.8+.2)= 2 . option e.

gmatophobia
Bob expected to spend a total of $9.00 to buy a given amount of pasta salad at a fixed price per pound. However, the price of the salad was $0.20 more per pound than Bob had expected. Consequently, he spent $9.00 and bought \(\frac{1}{2}\) pound less of the salad. How much did Bob spend per pound for the salad?

A. $1.80
B. $1.85
C. $1.90
D. $1.95
E. $2.00
User avatar
Subha1012
Joined: 09 Sep 2022
Last visit: 23 Jan 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is E , not A. RIGHT ?:think:
KarishmaB

gmatophobia
Bob expected to spend a total of $9.00 to buy a given amount of pasta salad at a fixed price per pound. However, the price of the salad was $0.20 more per pound than Bob had expected. Consequently, he spent $9.00 and bought \(\frac{1}{2}\) pound less of the salad. How much did Bob spend per pound for the salad?

A. $1.80
B. $1.85
C. $1.90
D. $1.95
E. $2.00
­
One of the question types in which I would use variables and equations to get to the quadratic and then plug in values. Just using reasoning from options straight away might lead to a lot of time wasted with high possibility of calculation errors.

Whatever you are asked to find, you should prefer to use that as a variable. So price he paid = p and weight he bought = w
pw = 9
Also, as per his initial expectation,

\((p - \frac{1}{5})(w + \frac{1}{2}) = 9\)

\(pw + \frac{p}{2} - \frac{w}{5} - \frac{1}{10} = 9\)

\(2w - 5p = 1\) (Eliminate w since we need the value of p)

\(\frac{18}{p} - 5p = 1\)

Now plug in. I know that 18/p will likely be an integer so I will try 2 first. I get -1. Incorrect.
Next try 1.8 because it will divide 18 evenly. I get 1. Valid.

Answer (A)
Moderators:
Math Expert
98903 posts
PS Forum Moderator
330 posts