The employment reports for both school are available online. Check out the top employers, industry splits, and relative salaries.
https://www.anderson.ucla.edu/Documents/ ... Report.pdfhttps://www.chicagobooth.edu/employmentr ... Report.pdfBooth clearly has the edge for consulting. Anderson sends more people to the tech industry. It's hard to say whether this is due to geographic considerations, competition from firms in other industries, self-selection of matriculating candidates, or a combination (likely).
In general, most of the same consulting and tech firms recruit at both schools and your offer for a given firm coming from either school would likely be identical. Most firms that come on-campus at Booth recruit nationally. At least some firms recruiting at Anderson offer less geographic flexibility (i.e. only hire for west-coast offices).
Good arguments on both sides of this one. How important is national brand to you? If the opportunities are similar at both schools, that $60k might loom pretty large in your decision. Perhaps more importantly, have you visited both programs? What feels right to you? There isn't really a bad decision among top-15ish schools.
Congrats and Good Luck!