It is currently 20 Sep 2017, 22:16

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 209 [1], given: 0

Location: South Korea
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Dec 2005, 00:17
1
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (00:55) correct 32% (01:02) wrong based on 244 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$50,000 than is Wilma's.
(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: both-betty-and-wilma-earn-annual-salaries-of-more-than-134229.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn !

Kudos [?]: 209 [1], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2893

Kudos [?]: 313 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Dec 2005, 04:01
Must be D. I don't think this requires explanation.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 313 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 381

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 17

Location: Chicago, IL
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Dec 2005, 15:47
D. Definitely each statement is sifficient on its own.
_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 17

Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 143

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Dec 2005, 23:46
how is the 2nd statement suff ????

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5039

Kudos [?]: 424 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Dec 2005, 00:56
Strange question. But I believe the answer should be D. Both statements tell you that Betty and Sara don't earn the same amount. Also, both statements tell you Betty earns more than Sara.

Kudos [?]: 424 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5210

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Dec 2005, 01:01
Unless the stem is miswritten, then the answer should be D.

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 325

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Location: London
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Dec 2005, 17:43
one more for D.

although the question is a bit unclear.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 133

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jan 2006, 22:16
I'm sorry. But I just simply can not see how either of the statements can be sufficient and even when combined together. Can somebody explain?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3354

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Jan 2006, 12:43
Ok I am a bit rusty....but I say its E...

Stem say betty and sara make more than 0.5 mill...we dont know if its 1 mil, 2 mil or exactly 0.5 milll

1) betty is closer to .5 mil OK, but if sara is close 1 mil and the combines salary is 1.5...sara makes more money...Insuff

2) it just says that betty is closer to 350K than is sara, cause sara might be making 2 mil..insuff

E it is..

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 2

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1800

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jan 2006, 00:36
I get D with little mental activity at 2:36 in the night

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 582

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jan 2006, 01:48
Natalya Khimich wrote:
I'm sorry. But I just simply can not see how either of the statements can be sufficient and even when combined together. Can somebody explain?

Natalya
Here's how i arrived at sol

Ques says tht both Betty(B) and Sara(S) earn greater than 50k bucks

a)B's salary is closer to 50k than S
e.g B=51k and S=54k ..Means that S's salary>B's salary so SUFFICIENT

b)B's salary is closer to 35k than S
e.g B=52k and S=55k...Means that B is nearer to 35k ..Again S>B so SUFF

clearly both are sufficient so D

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 133

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jan 2006, 14:37
I misunderstood the question. I thought Sara + Betty making more than 50,000, but not each of them. The word "both" confused me.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jan 2006, 18:00
gamjatang wrote:
Betty and Sara both earn more than 50000 every year. Is Betty's salary greater than Sara's?

1) The salary of Betty is closer to 50000 than Sara's.
2) The salary of Betty is closer to 35000 than it is to Sara's salary.

D too. each, not togather, emplyoee makes more than 50,000.

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 17582

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jun 2015, 14:25
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41642

Kudos [?]: 124217 [0], given: 12076

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jun 2015, 02:48
gamjatang wrote:
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$50,000 than is Wilma's.
(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50,000.

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$50,000 than is Wilma's.

----\$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

\$35,000----\$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: both-betty-and-wilma-earn-annual-salaries-of-more-than-134229.html
_________________

Kudos [?]: 124217 [0], given: 12076

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is   [#permalink] 08 Jun 2015, 02:48
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Last year, 'Crazy Matt's Electronics' earned 90% more than did 'Sane D 3 13 Jun 2017, 13:55
3 Each day at Dan’s new job, he earns \$10 more than the day before 3 07 Jun 2017, 04:37
4 Last year, department A earned 35% more than department B did. 4 27 Jul 2017, 17:40
2 Is Fred taller than Wilma? 2 07 Aug 2016, 06:49
21 Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$5000 12 26 Oct 2016, 07:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by