1. Which of the following statements finds the LEAST support in the passage?
(A) Darwin’s arrival at the Galapagos Islands had at least something in common with original species arrival.
(B) The Galapagos island chain is a unique genetic environment for the study of species development.
(C) Some species endured harsh salt, sun, and waves over a long distance before arriving in the Galapagos.
(D) Human introduction of new species types has been injurious to island ecosystems.
(E) Two distinct climate types are responsible, in part, for the extraordinary genetic diversity in the Galapagos.
For this question, it is not A as it is mentioned in the passage. The problem is people would still choose A as this is an highly unlikely answer, so it is always advisable to refer to the passage. The relevant portion of text - "Since the arrival of Darwin, blown by the wind and carried by the sea, the island group has been prized as a seedbed and mecca of genetic diversity, a natural laboratory of species adaptation and evolution."
SC knowledge is required here. The modifier "blown by the wind & carried by the sea" is modifying the noun "arrival".
____________________________________________________________
3. Which of the following statements is most readily inferable from the information in the passage?
(A) The odds against survival on the islands were greatest for those life forms originating in temperate climates.
(B) Galapagos reptiles outcompeted and displaced original amphibian populations.
(C) When they rise from the sea, volcanic islands are completely devoid of life.
(D) The odds in favor of survival on the islands were greatest for those species that were able to swim to the archipelago.
(E) The 600-mile distance to the mainland continues to favor the arrival and survival of certain species.
The question is not as hard as you may think. Let us bust some myths with the top two faulty answers E & B.
Lets tackle E first. The problem is the underlined words in the option - The 600-mile distance to the mainland continues to favor the arrival and survival of certain species.
No it does not 'continue to favour'. The author refers to the 600 miles as not big enough, while he was making the point about invasive species. The answer is cleverly constructed by using text from the passage but is completely unrelated.
Now on to B. First of all it is nowhere claimed that the Galapagos reptiles displaced original amphibian population. Secondly, you might be using your outside knowledge of Evolution to infer this - which is not how you should approach a RC. And finally, let us see this part of the passage - "Due to the unique and remote location of the archipelago, some species, such as reptiles, were able to survive and thrive, while other species and groups, such as amphibians and mammals, are scarcely in evidence in the island chain."
You cannot really infer option B from this information can you? Yes its using the two facts stated in B, but it is not a Cause->Effect relationship.
The answer is C.
Let us see the part of the passage - "the Galapagos Islands are volcanic; therefore, all species that now inhabit them arrived by sea and by wind"
Volcanic island --> that is the reason why all species immigrated from outside
What does that mean? No original inhabitants.