zoezhuyan
hi
MartyMurray ,
KarishmaBwould you guys please elaborate where my reasoning is wrong?
Quote:
B: When the public becomes aware that traffic enforcement has lessened, it typically becomes lax in obeying traffic rules.
after rearranging , public becomes lax in obeying traffic rules, then it gets more difficult to catch criminals if they using car after committing serious crimes.
so B does not encourage the rearrange.
It's true that, if people in general become lax in obeying traffic rules, it becomes less likely that criminals breaking traffic rules will be caught because officers will be dealing with a greater number of people breaking traffic rules.
So, to deal with this choice, we have to make a call regarding whether the writer of the question considered it a strengthener.
I think the call is to decide that the writer did not consider this choice a strengthener since this choice seems to be focused on an increase in traffic violations, which is only indirectly and unclearly related to the likelihood that officers will catch individuals committing serious crimes.
So, while if we consider this choice carefully, it does in a way strengthen the argument slightly, we can choose (C) instead because (C) more clearly strengthens the argument.
Quote:
Quote:
D: The offenders committing serious crimes who would be caught because of traffic violations are not the same group of individuals as those who would be caught if the arresting officers were reassigned from traffic enforcement.
D says the officers catch a group who are not committing serious crime if rearrange. IMO,
D also does not encourage rearrange.
Actually, what (D) means is that different people committing serious crimes would be caught if officers were reassigned.
After all, the point of the reassign is to have more officers working on "higher-priority, serious crimes."
So, either way, officers would be catching people committing serious crimes.
Thus, (D) has no clear effect on the argument since the fact that officers would be catching different individuals committing serious does not mean that they would be catching more or fewer of them.