Question 1: What does the passage do as a whole
A. Explains why self-assembly is the best approach to make integrated circuits
No, there is a comparison between the two approaches so we can say it's better than the other approach but saying it's the best approach is farfetched.B. Explains how the “top-bottom” approach is better than the “bottom-up approach”
Partially correct as it is explained in the first paragraph but not as a whole.C. Shows how the “bottom-up” and the “top-bottom approach” can both complement and hinder development of nano- scaling techniques
Its all jumbled. Top down approach is a hindrance for nano scaling not bottom-up.D. discusses how “top-bottom approach” has been discarded because of the new approach
No such thing has been said.E. Reasons that future necessitates an innovative approach
Yes, due to nano scaling there is demand for a new approach.Question 2: According to the author the primary difficulty in using top- bottom approach is that
A. The new approach is easier to work with
That's not the reason.B. The task of working on ever-smaller dimensions is way too complicated for the approach
Exactly why there is a need for the change.C. This process has worked since 1950s till now only
Although its been working since 1950s it is still perfectly fine for the transistors it's the nano scaling where the technology is hampered.D. It is not future ready
Its too generic we are looking for a specific reason.E. It is as tedious a task as exposing a negative on photographic paper
That's not the reason.Question3: Why does the author use the example of water splashing on a pane of glass
A. Explain how integrated circuits can be made only by self-assembly
The term water splashing is used in second paragraph and second paragraph is all about how to combine two technologies.B. To provide an analogy for the combined method
Yes, that's what it is actually doing basically summing up the second paragraph.(describing combined method)C. To illustrate bottom- up approach
No. as discussed in A and BD. To raise questions about bottom-up approach
See A and BE. To evaluate the combined method
We are not discussing pros and cons we are drawing an analogy.Question 4: Which of the following best expresses the function of the first paragraph in relation to the passage as a whole
A. To establish the parameters of an ensuing debate
We are not debating anything here we are discussing the two technologies.B. To identify problems in one of the processes, which are then explored in greater details
Only one problem has been mentioned not sure about what other problems are.? And no such exploitation on the problem has been done.C. To provide a backdrop for a discussion of a modern day approach
Yes by introducing a modern day approach in the last part of the first paragraph it is setting the platform for modern day approach to be discussed further.D. To discuss an existing prototype that the author admires
Author is not taking any sides here.E. To introduce opposing viewpoints, which are then evaluated
No viewpoints have been presented just the facts.Question 5: Which of the following titles best summarizes the passage as a whole
A. A look at the history of nanostructures
The word history bugged me off, as bottom up approach is future technology.B. Pointing out limited usefulness of the “top-down” process
Its only partially correct many other things have been discussed.C. Detailed study of transistors
We are not confined to only transistors we are discussing about IC's too.D. At the threshold of new approach
This sounds good, as the older technology will become redundant if no steps are taken.E. How top-bottom approach works
Only partially correct.P.S- If I have screwed this up
carcass please allow me delete this post.