LazyBoy8
I am starting to believe that rankings do play a larger role than I was initially led to believe. I feel pretty strongly that my work experience GPA and GMAT are in the ballpark for the schools I have been dinged from. I believe that yield management -now more than ever- is of particular importance for many schools. The change in the application process that happened recently changed the game. Michigan has already exceeded last year's whole application cycle through round 2. Yale is up 37% YoY through the January round. I think some schools are less willing to take risks this year with people who may balk. It makes sense to me as a business person. As an individual whose pride has been smacked around ehhhh it doesn't make as much sense.
I totally agree. However, I do still think that the rankings matter more to certain schools than others. Obviously the bigger CGSM schools like Michigan, NYU and others are rankings-focused because they have to be: If you've got 300-400 applications from CGSM to sort through and can ultimately only take 40-50, you're gonna consider those who ranked you higher as more of a priority. I think the same goes for Tuck and Yale, as they've become more popular schools in the Consortium than in previous years, it seems.
But for schools like Emory, or UNC or Texas? You could probably rank them No. 3 or even No. 4 and still have a real shot at not only admission but a fellowship. Each school is going to make more fellowship and membership offers than they can realistically take, to account for those who will turn them down. So, I do think the rankings matter a lot more than the schools tell us, but I don't think it will (or should, anyway) seriously affect admissions offers if you rank a school very, very low.