If you have the bandwidth, get your app in for R2. I applied last year and was waitlisted in R3. You have to realize Haas has a relatively smaller class size 220-250 students. My guess is more than half the class is filled up in R1 and R2. You have more than a week, work on the app and get it in for R2.
Just to give you an example from my personal experience - I applied to Haas last year in R3 and was wait-listed. This year, I reapplied to Haas and some other programs that I did not previously apply to (All in R1). Of the 5 schools I applied to (Wharton, Chicago, Columbia, Kellogg and Haas), I interviewed at the first three and arguably the hardest of the 5. My profile didn't change much since last year, but R1 (and in Haas' case R1 and R2) definitely "ups" your chances and gives you a shot on a blank canvas.
If you were my close friend, I would say go R2. Rest is your decision.
chaoticsilence wrote:
Congrats to all those with interview calls, hope you all get in.
I'm one of those who's still working hard to get his application ready for Haas, unfortunately, don't know if I can make the december 2 deadline for R2 and am feeling extremely disheartened. I understand and agree with the general wisdom about preferring quality over speed when it comes to applications. And I know, for most schools R1 vs R2 doesn't make a huge difference.
I'm just wondering how it works with berkeley-- since the school has 4 rounds. Obviously earlier is better, but since it has 4 rounds, I'm not sure how to look at R2 vs R3. Is there a significant disadvantage of applying in R3? (like most other schools) or does Haas work differently.
Can anyone can shed some light on this? -- its been giving me sleepless nights. Would be great if a Haas student/ alum could throw some approx intake numbers for each of the rounds.. or just the general trend (say over 80% in R1+R2 or something like that)
Thanks in advance!
Ankur