Hey all - I got 2 long winded questions for everyone out there. These are 2 things I've been thinking a lot about and would love to hear people's thoughts:
1) For all students that have been admitted (potentially only to 1 school) and already know which school they will be attending this fall - have you paid your deposit yet? Or are you delibrately holding off until after the fellowship decisions, well knowing that you will attend that school regardless of fellowship decision. I guess my point is - do you think paying your deposit clearly signals your intent and so a school might be LESS likely to offer you the fellowship bc they might feel they already have you "wrapped up" so to speak and dont need to throw money your way to entice you. On the flip side, maybe its good to pay your deposit and show your intent bc no one likes rejection so a school might be MORE likely to offer you the fellowship if they know you will be attending their school in the fall. Am I over analyzing this or is it worth considering? For the record - i have not paid my deposit, but will be attending Johnson in the fall regardless of how anything else shakes up. I'm just debating whether or not i should just pay my deposit already or still play a little "hard to get".
2) What do schools consider when deciding which admitted students get their allotted Consortium fellowships? I know each school has a financial aid / scholarship committe that determines if you get financial aid based on the merit of your whole application (GMAT, GPA, WE, Essays etc.). I also know that the Consortium determines membership based on the essay we wrote demonstrating our commitment to their mission, and the rec letter that went along with that. So now my question is, assuming you're granted membership by the Consortium and are elligible on draft day - what is the deciding factor in who gets the fellowships? Is it overall merit (similar to school specific financial aid), do the school representatives NOW read your mission based essay (do they ever read this essay?) and make determinations based off that, or is it really just the candidates that the Offices of Diversity like the most?
Like i said - two really long winded, way over analyzed questions that I've been thinking about for a while. any thoughts or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.