sexonthebeach150
On the make or break - I have to disagree. There is so much that you can get from someone - both from their verbal and nonverbal communication - and while many people have interviews that don't particularly stand out, and therefore it's not make or break - what if you happen to get the few very vocal members of the AdCom, or the Admissions Director?
You never know who you're going to get and how strongly they can argue for/against your candidacy (or just make the decision on their own), and thus it's best to treat it as make or break. We've all done work interviews and, from my experience, once you've selected the best resume/cover letter combos, after that it primarily comes down to how the candidate presents themselves in the interview.
Granted, for admissions, the person interviewing you may not also be the (sole) decider - but it can effect how strongly they argue for you to get in, at a place that's really competitive, and thus to me it is make or break.
Well, how you choose to treat something can be completely different from what it actually is. First, the process is designed to make evaluation as objective as possible - so it is designed to adjust for who interviews the candidate. Well, the reality is, given how competitive it is to get to this stage in the process, most interviews are what you would call "good", and quite honestly, "bad" interviews are
extremely rare. The bad interviews are those where, like I have said above, the candidate says something absolutely inappropriate/wrong.
You presume that the role the resume and cover letters play in the job application process is like the role that the essays and recommendations play. They have
some similarities, but the essays and recommendations are far more detailed and play a much more important role than the resume and cover letter
after the interview. For jobs, the resume is the foot in the door. Once you get the interview,
only the interview matters. For B-school admission, the essays and reccos are much more important that that. Your entire application is evaluated again after the interview.
Should you put your best foot forward in the interview? Absolutely yes. But does that mean you will get the admit for sure? No. Does that increase your odds of getting an admit? Yes. But does that mean it is make or break? No. You can have a very ordinary interview and still get the admit.
I agree with KingKREEP. If MBA admissions interview had the same importance as job interview then AdCom would have conveniently omitted essays and rec letters. Actually, depending on the school's culture, one component has more weightage than the other. For example, Darden values interviews a lot more.