Stele
I know enough people that went to the UC schools to know it is significantly easier to get into as in-state, and no, you don't have to be necessarily top Ivy material.
I can't agree with this statement 100%. While everyone probably knows and agrees that top Ivy students are the king of all kings, it's not exactly "mad" easy to get into berkeley or UCLA. True, chances are it's going to be easier for in-state student, but one thing you have to understand is that most of the applicants are going to be in-state students. And to call it mad easy to get in Berkeley would truly be a misnomer. A quick search of the average incoming undergrads for Berkeley shows to be 3.93 (unweighted). I chose UPenn to be one of the top ivy, but couldn't find an average GPA posted. However, even if it's higher than 3.93, it can't be much higher since unweighted GPA caps out at 4.00. With that said, it's still harder to get in Penn because Penn simply admits fewer folks. So yes, I agree that it'll be harder for anyone to get in top Ivy, but it certainly will not be a walk in the park for someone to get in Berkeley either. And just to recap, since most of the applicants are in-state, what you'll see as a majority of the students there would be in-state students; therefore, creating a false sense of in-state admission being easier than out-of-state. But in full view, here's the number comparing in-state and out-of-state admission to Berkeley:
California residents total applicants: 38,443 and admitted 9,495 in-state applicants.
Out-of-state total applicants: 7,189 and admitted 2,468 out-of-state applicants.
The admission proportion comes out to be 24.7% in-state admission and 34.3% out-of-state admission.