flyingbunny2005
As I said, announcing the rules beforehand is a way to get away from liability. It is just legally correct therefore reasonable, but it doesn't mean it is ethical.
Anyway, no use to discuss this here. Let's focus on the original thread about the admission thing.
Flawed logic again, flyingbunny:
1. There is no liability to speak of.
2. Announcing the rules beforehand is called "fair game", and as long as all applicants are given equal treatment, the process stays fair, and as far as I am concerned, everyone regardless of background, race, gender, nationality, etc is given equal consideration at Wharton.
Let's look at the process for a minute:
Admissions decision can have three outcomes in each round: admit, deny and waitlist. Your reasoning implies that there are only two types of decision that are ethical: admit or deny. In other words, you are saying that taking more time to decide on borderline candidates is unethical.
Let's move this example to hiring decisions that take place every day in all HR offices around the globe. A bunch of candidates is screened and interviewed. Some of them are rejected right away, some are hired, and some are asked to wait a little longer before a final decision could be made.
Is it unethical to notify job seekers that the decision about their hiring has not been finalized?