American working abroad working in development. Just had my interview with an much older alumni - graduated in the the late 1960s. Standard behavior questions as expected.
Mixed feelings about the interview which has lead me to really question their fairness.
Overall it went well. I knew my answers and executed my delivery well. There was also a good report between myself and the interviewer. This would normally sound like a good interview.
However, his english was beyond rusty. He had to have his wife, no spring chicken either and an American expat, transcribe the interview on the Wharton provided forms. There is three real problems with this. One, I'm not really sure the level to which he understood my answers - when he summarized my answers they were super dumbed down to what I had presented to him. Two, his wife at times didn't understand what I was talking about and had to read me what she was writing and have me correct it because she didn't quite follow me (these weren't crazy complete stories just by design had some terminology and stuff that she didn't grasp). And finally, three, what she wrote in the boxes (there were three sections per question as stated in other posts) was very brief.
Now, there is a chance I will receive high marks from my interviewer but who knows. However, even if I do, I'm not sure how much the adcom focuses on what is written in the responses. Based in what was being written in during the interview, it was a very short and understated explanation of my stories.
Not sure what to think but I guess I'm just glad its all done.