maverick2011
1. Does Chicago really feel like a "commuter school"? If so, is that a disadvantage?
It depends on what your priorities are, so take me for example. These were my priorities and the facts I uncovered visiting Boston and Chicago multiple times.
Priorities:
1. Don't want getting back and forth from school to home to be a process, i.e. greater than 10 minutes of walking, riding public transportation, etc. Time management will be difficult enough during school, so I want the option to sneak back home to take a nap, get some food or retrieve something I forgot without it being painful.
2. I want easy access to gym, especially the school's which will be free, stores (food, etc.) and night life again without a process and preferrably without driving.
3. A good place to run and/or take a bike ride for a workout.
4. I would like to sell my truck, Ford F-350, because parking would kill me in the city and diesel is getting stupid expensive. ($4/gal) Plus I hate commuting be vehicle. I would rather read, walk and in general not deal with traffic, etc.
Boston:
Cambridge lacks significant night life but across the Charles River in Beacon Hill is a good substitute. The commute as long as your are near the red line (MIT specific) is easy and less than 10 minutes. Unfortunately, HBS is not easy to get to via the "T", so this doesn't apply. Boston is a nice compact city with a great public transportation system. For example, you can take a commuter train right to a ski hill and Amtrak is actually reliable south to New York. Bike riding and running are easy access from either side of the Charles River because of a bike path the city built along the banks. As long as I live along the red line I have no more than one stop to get to Kendall Square which is one block from school.
Chicago:
Hyde Park is near the hood and doesn't contain much for after school entertainment. Chicago is great with trendy spots for the younger crowd in Lincoln Park, Downtown and Lakeview. However, this makes getting to school a commute of roughly 30 minutes by vehicle. Although Chicago has great public transportation it is somewhat divided between north and south, this means if you live someplace like Lincoln Park you would take the "L" to as close to the Millenium Park commuter train station, but you'll have to walk a few blocks to bridge the gap. Then you'll be able to get down to Hyde Park. This process could take upwards of an hour. If you lived in Hyde Park, your problem would be getting home at night since the commuter trains discontinue service then it will be a $30 cab ride. What it comes down to if you could cut away that distance between Hyde Park and downtown you would have a situation very similar to Boston, but those extra miles and somewhat balkanized distribution of mass transit makes it more difficult. Running and biking in Chicago is nice with the Lake Shore. There is easy access from Hyde Park and most of the areas I mentioned. You may have to run a few blocks east to get on the bike path.
I love both Unversity of Chicago and MIT, although I'm on the waitlist at Chicago and I'm accepted at MIT. I just want every other aspect outside of b-school to be simplified, so Boston just seems to be better fit. My two cents for you.
I say yes Chicago is a commuter school unless you live in Hyde Park.