GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Nov 2018, 17:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
  • All GMAT Club Tests are Free and open on November 22nd in celebration of Thanksgiving Day!

     November 22, 2018

     November 22, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Mark your calendars - All GMAT Club Tests are free and open November 22nd to celebrate Thanksgiving Day! Access will be available from 0:01 AM to 11:59 PM, Pacific Time (USA)
  • Free lesson on number properties

     November 23, 2018

     November 23, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Practice the one most important Quant section - Integer properties, and rapidly improve your skills.

Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 90
Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2007, 11:23
6
33
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:09) correct 43% (02:21) wrong based on 1642 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is known to prolong the life of rats and mice by preventing heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other diseases. A six-month study of 48 moderately overweight people, who each reduced their calorie intake by at least 25 percent, demonstrated decreases in insulin levels and body temperature, with the greatest decrease observed in individuals with the greatest percentage change in their calorie intake. Low insulin level and body temperature are both considered signs of longevity, partly because an earlier study by other researchers found both traits in long-lived people.

If the above statements are true, they support which of the following inferences?


(A) Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice.

(B) Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so.

(C) Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.

(D) Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels.

(E) Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 28
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2007, 14:10
1
E... "atleast 25%" and "greatest percent".
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 165
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2007, 14:25
1
I will go with E as well.

a. Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice.
-Just because some of the results are similar we cannot inference that all results are similar.

b. Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so.
- This is close. While from the argument it should be true. However we cannot make a blanket stmt for all human beings. There could be other reasons not mentioned in the argument why someone who has reduced calorie intake by atleast 25% could die earlier.

c. Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.
-Insulin level can also increase owing to other reasons not mentioned in the stmt.

d. Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels.
-Just because humans are likely to live longer does not gurantee that they will be healthier.

e. Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.
- This is paraphrasing of the stmts already made in the argument and hence can be certainly infrenced.
_________________

Regards

Subhen

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 302
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2007, 08:19
1
I'll go with (A).

How can it be (E)???

Atleast 25 % does not mean necessarily greater than 25 % ..............may all the subjects reduced their calorie intake by exactly 25%.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 434
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2007, 08:27
2
1
1
sidbidus wrote:
I'll go with (A).

How can it be (E)???

Atleast 25 % does not mean necessarily greater than 25 % ..............may all the subjects reduced their calorie intake by exactly 25%.


But it also says higher the calorie reduction better the results are. Doesnt that mean there were atleast a few people who had reduced their intake by greater than 25%
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 782
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2009, 02:31
1
True. I would go with E.

Why not C >> there is no mention that calorie intake is 'directly' related to lower insulin levels. It might be possible that lower intake reduces metabolism and this in turn causes lower insulin levels.

Why E >> each reduced their calorie intake by atleast 25%. Now it might be possible that all reduced their intake by 'exactly' 25%. But reading further the stem says that there was a variance in insulin based on percentage intake...and hence..some people should have definitely reduced intake by more than 25%, only then comparison is possible.

pm4553 wrote:
Confused between C & E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 158
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2009, 10:35
1
trainspotting wrote:
Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is known to prolong the life of rats and mice by preventing heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other diseases. A six-month study of 48 moderately overweight people, who each reduced their calorie intake by at least 25 percent, demonstrated decreases in insulin levels and body temperature, with the greatest decrease observed in individuals with the greatest percentage change in their calorie intake. Low insulin level and body temperature are both considered signs of longevity, partly because an earlier study by other researchers found both traits in long-lived people.

If the above statements are true, they support which of the following inferences?

A. Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice.
B. Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so.
C. Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.
D. Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels.
E. Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.


I think I would go with (E), for it is the least disputable claim. The original info states that everyone reduced C-intake by at least 25%. However, greatest changes resulted with the greatest percentage change in C-intake. This implies that not everyone's C-intake reduction level was the same. & since a intake reduction of less than 25% is impossible, some individuals must have reduced C-intake by more than 25%.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Feb 2016
Posts: 92
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 690 Q42 V47
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V39
GPA: 3.57
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Dec 2016, 08:16
I always get confused between assumption and inference question. And specially in the heat of the examination I make this error continuously. Any lucid explanation or cheat sheet for the same.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2990
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2016, 22:32
2
AmritaSarkar89 wrote:
I always get confused between assumption and inference question. And specially in the heat of the examination I make this error continuously. Any lucid explanation or cheat sheet for the same.


Identify the premise; identify the conclusion . Visualize a logic flow diagram (premise -----> conclusion).

Now consider the given option.

Does the option lie IN BETWEEN the premise and conclusion? Then it is an assumption (premise ------assumption----> conclusion). The assumption is a link between premise and conclusion.

Does the option lie AFTER the conclusion? Then it is an inference (premise -----> conclusion--------> inference). The inference follows from something (either premise, conclusion or other information) given in the passage.
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2128
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2017, 09:10
1
Piter wrote:
Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is known to prolong the life of rats and mice by preventing heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other diseases. A six-month study of 48 moderately overweight people, who each reduced their calorie intake by at least 25 percent, demonstrated decreases in insulin levels and body temperature, with the greatest decrease observed in individuals with the greatest percentage change in their calorie intake. Low insulin level and body temperature are both considered signs of longevity, partly because an earlier study by other researchers found both traits in long-lived people.

If the above statements are true, they support which of the following inferences?

(A) Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice.

(B) Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so.

(C) Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.

(D) Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels.

(E) Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.


A. The passage states that calorie restriction in mice and rats prolongs life by preventing diseases. The human study had much more limited findings – that calorie restriction in moderately overweight humans decreases insulin levels and body temperature. While these traits are known to be associated with longevity, there are no data that link calorie restriction itself to prolonged human life. Additionally, calorie restriction may have other unstated effects, unrelated to longevity. There is no information in the passage that indicates whether these effects are the same in humans as in mice and rats. Finally, the use of the term "humans" is far too general; the study dealt only with moderately overweight humans and so any inference would need to be restricted to this subset of individuals.

B. While the passage indicates that certain traits known to be associated with longevity are found in moderately overweight humans who reduce their calorie intake, this is far removed from the conclusion that calorie intake will actually increase a human's lifespan. Additionally, the use of the term "humans" is far too general; the study dealt only with moderately overweight humans and so any inference would need to be restricted to this subset of individuals.

C. The study observed that individuals with the greatest percentage decrease in their calorie intake demonstrated the greatest decrease in insulin levels and body temperature. This shows a strong correlation between calorie intake and insulin levels. However, this correlation is not necessarily direct. It is possible that this correlation holds, but only up to a point. For example, it might be the case that any reduction in calorie intake over 50 percent does not result in any additional insulin level decreases. Moreover, the passage only draws this correlation for individuals with the greatest percent decrease in calorie intake. It is very possible that individuals with a relatively low decrease in calorie intake exhibit the exact same decrease in insulin levels as individuals with a moderate decrease in calorie intake.

(D) The study makes no reference to the health of individuals who reduce their calorie intake. It tries to draw some connection to the longevity of those individuals, but longevity is not the same as health. An individual could live a very long, unhealthy life.

(E) CORRECT. The passage states that the greatest decrease in insulin levels was observed in individuals with the greatest percentage change in their calorie intake. This means that some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by a greater percentage than other individuals in the study. The passage also states that the study participants reduced their individual calorie intakes by "at least 25 percent." Thus, one can safely infer that there were some participants who reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.

Answer E
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Thread Master - Part Time MBA Programs
avatar
S
Joined: 11 Jan 2018
Posts: 118
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V30
GMAT 2: 640 Q48 V30
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V36
GPA: 3.32
WE: Operations (Retail)
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2018, 15:53
sidbidus wrote:
I'll go with (A).

How can it be (E)???

Atleast 25 % does not mean necessarily greater than 25 % ..............may all the subjects reduced their calorie intake by exactly 25%.


A cannot be the answer because rat and mice are related to longevity due to reduced heart diseases, but we don't know if longevity in humans is due to reduced heart diseases or not. I thought the answer is B... but i agree how can it be E...? when context says each one of them had at least 25% reduction in calorie intake.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 08 Aug 2017
Posts: 257
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2018, 16:58
Option E : some people reduced more than 25% calorie intake..
Individuals reduced at least 25% calorie intake.....This is already provided in stimulus.

Now, it is quite vague to infer from at least to more than.Is it right?
Moreover, how can rephrased statement of premise be inference?
Anyone there please explain.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is &nbs [#permalink] 12 Sep 2018, 16:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.