A is the correct answer.Quote:
Can any research be found to validate the contention that those who spend time plucking out their gray hairs have more negative attitudes toward the elderly than those who shrug their shoulders about their gray hairs? Unless a person’s psychopathology leads him or her to overgeneralize, there is no necessary connection. Certainly, it is reasonable to like the elderly yet dislike the idea of impaired eyesight and hearing. Furthermore, holding negative attitudes toward older people merely because they are old is immoral, according to nearly universally accepted ethical standards. But there is nothing immoral about disliking some concomitants of the aging process.
Premise 1: Can any research be found to validate the contention that those who spend time plucking out their gray hairs have more negative attitudes toward the elderly than those who shrug their shoulders about their gray hairs? Unless a person’s psychopathology leads him or her to overgeneralize, there is no necessary connection. Certainly, it is reasonable to like the elderly yet dislike the idea of impaired eyesight and hearing.
Premise 2: Furthermore, holding negative attitudes toward older people merely because they are old is immoral, according to nearly universally accepted ethical standards. But there is nothing immoral about disliking some concomitants of the aging process.
Conclusion:
The fact that a person dislikes some characteristics that accompany old age does not mean that such a person dislikes or dispises the elderly.The argument says that no research validates the contention that a person who dislikes the physical signs of old age on himself/herself has more negative attitudes toward the elderly than the person who ignores or cares less about the appearance of these signs of old age on his/her body. In other words, the author is saying that a person's dislike for the characteristics of old age is not a necessary condition that such a person dislikes the elderly. Disliking or not caring about the characteristics of old age on one's body is irrelevant when assessing whether one dislikes the elderly (or not). The author goes on to present the point in the second premise, bolstering the point made in premise one by stating that holding negative attitudes towards older people merely because they are old is immoral, but there is nothing immoral about disliking characteristics associated with the aging process.
(A) It cannot be assumed that people who dislike some of the physical concomitants of growing old necessarily have negative feelings toward the elderly.
Exactly the conclusion that can be predicted from the argument presented by the author.
(B) To dislike some of the physical concomitants of growing old is reasonable, while to dislike the elderly is immoral.
This is a premise provided to lead to the conclusion stated above that the fact that a person dislikes some characteristics that accompany old age does not mean that such a person dislikes or dispises the elderly. B is thus wrong.
(C) Since no one likes the physical concomitants of growing old, it is wrong to dislike the elderly merely because of their physical characteristics.
The argument did not say that no one likes the physical characteristics of growing old. Besides, the argument did not state a cause and effect relationship between not liking the physical characteristics associated with growing old as the cause of why it is wrong to dislike the elderly. C is incorrect.
(D) Being elderly is fine, but the process of becoming elderly is not, and people need to understand this distinction between the two.
The argument did not make any point that leads to the conclusion that being elderly is fine. The argument is not about the distinction between being elderly and process of becoming elderly. D is incorrect.
(E) To dislike the elderly is immoral, and to do so just because one dislikes some of the physical concomitants of growing old is unreasonable.
Although the argument makes reference to the fact that it is immoral to dislike the elderly, this fact was only provided as part of the second premise to support the conclusion of the argument.