|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
09 Feb 2015, 18:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
The Author's claim about the people, who are not concerned about the regulation of red mean intake and fatty cheese intake does not clearly prove its point. Also, the comparison of living styles of owners of the restaurants is seriously flawed. The House of Beef owners may be millionaires because they may have passed with the wealth from their ancestors and the Good Earth Cafe owners may be doing a well to do business.
First of all, the reason for people are not concerned about red meat intake is that the recent research about the value of protein and fat content in red meat is better now as compared to its proteins and fat content a decade ago. In addition to this, people are now educated about the processing of red meat and they are aware about its consequences. Same applies to fatty cheese. Modern technology is so improved that the fats responsible for impacting people's health has been regulated and the cheese available today is of better quality than that of decade ago.
Secondly, when it is a grocery store, the contents available shouldn’t be just limited to organic fruitys and vegetables. There are certain people who also prefer cheese along with organic fruits and vegetables. Now because of the techonologies like social media, in which the communication or awareness spreads faster when compared to decade ago. This has led people to educate themselves and take their decisions appropriately.
The comaprison between the living style and wealth of two restaurant owners is seriously undermined when we prove that this has nothing to do with the business they make from the sale at restaurants. The vegetarian restaurant may be so old that, it does not proper ambience and people do not prefer to go there. Also, House of Beef restaurant much better ambience with improved fine dining facility. This is obviously attract more business and it adds to the wealth.
The concerns of people's food intake is dependent on many criteria today when compared to a decade ago. Advance technology in food processing and social media have played a good enough role to educate the people. Also the modern people prefer better fine dining options and same has been provided by the house of beef restaurant. People prefer to visit this place and have vegetarian food and still maintain a good health.
First of all, the reason for people are not concerned about red meat intake is that the recent research about the value of protein and fat content in red meat is better now as compared to its proteins and fat content a decade ago. In addition to this, people are now educated about the processing of red meat and they are aware about its consequences. Same applies to fatty cheese. Modern technology is so improved that the fats responsible for impacting people's health has been regulated and the cheese available today is of better quality than that of decade ago.
Secondly, when it is a grocery store, the contents available shouldn’t be just limited to organic fruitys and vegetables. There are certain people who also prefer cheese along with organic fruits and vegetables. Now because of the techonologies like social media, in which the communication or awareness spreads faster when compared to decade ago. This has led people to educate themselves and take their decisions appropriately.
The comaprison between the living style and wealth of two restaurant owners is seriously undermined when we prove that this has nothing to do with the business they make from the sale at restaurants. The vegetarian restaurant may be so old that, it does not proper ambience and people do not prefer to go there. Also, House of Beef restaurant much better ambience with improved fine dining facility. This is obviously attract more business and it adds to the wealth.
The concerns of people's food intake is dependent on many criteria today when compared to a decade ago. Advance technology in food processing and social media have played a good enough role to educate the people. Also the modern people prefer better fine dining options and same has been provided by the house of beef restaurant. People prefer to visit this place and have vegetarian food and still maintain a good health.
Attachments
The Author.docx [28.53 KiB]
Downloaded 106 times
20 Apr 2015, 08:20
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi, you'd better ask competent writers to proofread your essay. For example, at Papers Gear. They will estimate your writing with their professional view.
10 Jun 2015, 07:58
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi, please review my AWA GMAT essay. It is my first try and my GMAT exam is in 3 weeks. Would be a lot of help if an expert can do it.
The following was used as part of an internet advertising company's appeal to businesses:"Furniture Depot employed our internet advertising company to help. Since then its sales increased by 10% over last year's totals. Furniture Depot's success demonstrates how using our internet services can increase your profitability."
Describe how well reasoned you find this argument. In the discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the argument's conclusion. You may also address possible changes in the argument that would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
The argument states that Furniture Depot used the advertising company's services and hence, was able to increases its sales and profitability. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors which can be used to evaluate the argument. Due to the absence of such factors, the argument is weak, unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument argument assumes that the use of the internet company's services has led to the increase in sales of Furniture Depot. The argument fails to give concrete evidence that use of such services was the sole reason for the company's improvement in performance. For example, high prices offered by the Furniture Depot's competitor might have led to higher sales or higher discounts by the company could have been a major factor in contributiing to the increased sales or a favourable change in the external environment might have been the cause of increased sales.
Second, the argument claims that using the advertising company's services led to higher profitability. However, the argument fails to mention the cost of employing such service. The argument states that the sales were increased by 10% while the profitability was also increased. However, without mentioning the cost of the acquired services the argument fails to tell the margin that the company ultimately earned. For instance, the company might have increased sales by 10% but the profits only increased by 1%. Therefore, the argument's effectiveness comes into questioned.
Finally, the argument is an appeal by the internet company to prospective clients for further business. However, the argument fails to clarify the kind of services provided by the advertising company. Hence, the prospective clients do not get a holistic picture of the advertising company's services, which casts a serious doubt on the effectiveness of the argument. The argument could have been strengthened by mentioning a brief outline of the kinds of strategies used by the advertising company to increase sales.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed because of the aforementioned reasons. The argument could have been strengthened if it mentioned all the relevant facts. A situation where a decision needs to be taken should be evaluated according to all its contributing factors. Without these factors, the argument is unsubstantiated and open to debate.
The following was used as part of an internet advertising company's appeal to businesses:"Furniture Depot employed our internet advertising company to help. Since then its sales increased by 10% over last year's totals. Furniture Depot's success demonstrates how using our internet services can increase your profitability."
Describe how well reasoned you find this argument. In the discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the argument's conclusion. You may also address possible changes in the argument that would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
The argument states that Furniture Depot used the advertising company's services and hence, was able to increases its sales and profitability. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors which can be used to evaluate the argument. Due to the absence of such factors, the argument is weak, unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument argument assumes that the use of the internet company's services has led to the increase in sales of Furniture Depot. The argument fails to give concrete evidence that use of such services was the sole reason for the company's improvement in performance. For example, high prices offered by the Furniture Depot's competitor might have led to higher sales or higher discounts by the company could have been a major factor in contributiing to the increased sales or a favourable change in the external environment might have been the cause of increased sales.
Second, the argument claims that using the advertising company's services led to higher profitability. However, the argument fails to mention the cost of employing such service. The argument states that the sales were increased by 10% while the profitability was also increased. However, without mentioning the cost of the acquired services the argument fails to tell the margin that the company ultimately earned. For instance, the company might have increased sales by 10% but the profits only increased by 1%. Therefore, the argument's effectiveness comes into questioned.
Finally, the argument is an appeal by the internet company to prospective clients for further business. However, the argument fails to clarify the kind of services provided by the advertising company. Hence, the prospective clients do not get a holistic picture of the advertising company's services, which casts a serious doubt on the effectiveness of the argument. The argument could have been strengthened by mentioning a brief outline of the kinds of strategies used by the advertising company to increase sales.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed because of the aforementioned reasons. The argument could have been strengthened if it mentioned all the relevant facts. A situation where a decision needs to be taken should be evaluated according to all its contributing factors. Without these factors, the argument is unsubstantiated and open to debate.
