Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 03:07 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 03:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OE

3. Which of the following can be inferred from the first paragraph of the passage?

Pro-death signaling is given in a list of “cellular mechanisms that stymie genetic changes.” “Stymie” means “hinder.” The first statement is true.

These cellular mechanisms are called “ubiquitous,” which means existing everywhere, so certainly they are “very common.” The second statement is also true.

The final sentence of the paragraph says that “malfunctions in molecular players that safeguard against mutagenesis, such as the protein p53, have been implicated in diseases such as cancer.” Since the malfunction of p53 may cause cancer, it can be inferred that p53, when properly functioning, may work against cancer. The third statement is also true.

Answer: A,B,C
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OE

4. The analogy regarding “a few dozen language phrases ... conversation” (Highlighted) is meant to elucidate

According to the passage, T cells need a large repertoire of receptors in order to be able to recognize a wide variety of pathogens. The passage goes on to say that “[r]elying only on a genetically encoded repertoire would be disadvantageously limiting—analogous to having only a few dozen language phrases with which to respond to the nearly infinite potential combinations of words in a conversation. Instead, the repertoire is generated by a process of genetic recombination ... ” According to this analogy, the language phrases are the repertoire of receptors; just as a speaker must respond to a nearly infinite body of language combinations, T cells must also have a large repertoire so they can respond to a wide variety of pathogens. This repertoire is increased through genetic recombination. Choice (A) is correct.

Note that choice (B) is out of scope, choice (C) is the exact opposite of what is being described, choice (D) is a distortion based on another analogy in the passage (also, an analogy on the GRE would not be “meant to elucidate” another analogy!), and choice (E) refers to the first paragraph, not the analogy in question.

Answer: A
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OE

5. In the analogy in the third paragraph, the “nearly infinite potential combinations of words in a conversation” represent

In the analogy referenced, the “language phrases” are receptors that can respond to various pathogens. The “nearly infinite potential combinations of words” is what a speaker must respond to—the reason a speaker needs a wide repertoire of language. Similarly, the wide variety of pathogens is the reason T cells need such a wide variety of receptors. This supports the first statement only.

Answer: A