GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Oct 2019, 19:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2016
Posts: 21
Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 25 Jun 2018, 04:36
29
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (01:12) correct 44% (01:15) wrong based on 701 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bargaining strength of employees, the World Economic Forum putting employers in the fore for contributing to the rise in temporary employment.


(A) the World Economic Forum putting employers in the fore for contributing

(B) employers have been put in the fore by the World Economic Forum, contributing

(C) employers have been put in the fore by the World Economic Forum, which contributes

(D) the World Economic Forum has put employers in the fore, contributing

(E) the World Economic Forum has put employers in the fore for contributing

Originally posted by burnrohan on 15 Nov 2016, 12:57.
Last edited by Bunuel on 25 Jun 2018, 04:36, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5104
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Nov 2016, 10:38
5
Top Contributor
E means that WEF is trying to explain the cause of the rise in temporary employment by stating that the employers have switched to temporary people due to some X and Y factors. Whereas D says that the act of putting the employers in the fore itself is causing the rise. Hope the difference between D and E is clear.
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't make out how to pole-vault over the 630-barrier, you can do so with my one-to-one lessons. (+919884544509)
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Nov 2016
Posts: 9
Location: United States
Schools: ESSEC '20
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.9
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2016, 13:14
2
E is the right choice.

A: cannot be the answer as we cannot use the -ing verb form "putting". Do not treat "citing" and "putting"in parallelism. The first is an adverbial clause.

B and C : No. Because the subject is "The World Economic Forum" not employers.

D: "contributing" after a comma makes it a a separate clause.

E: it's perfect.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4774
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2016, 13:23
3
burnrohan wrote:
Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bargaining strength of employees, the World Economic Forum putting employers in the fore for contributing to the rise in temporary employment.

(A) the World Economic Forum putting employers in the fore for contributing
(B) employers have been put in the fore by the World Economic Forum, contributing
(C) employers have been put in the fore by the World Economic Forum, which contributes
(D) the World Economic Forum has put employers in the fore, contributing
(E) the World Economic Forum has put employers in the fore for contributing


Errors in the options highlighgted in Red, answer must be (E)

_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Aug 2016
Posts: 36
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q47 V21
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Nov 2016, 09:01
1
1
Experts please help in explaining why choice D is wrong here ?

Does "contributing to the rise in temporary employment" not represent the result of previous clause ? If yes then why comma proceeded by V +ing is incorrect ?
_________________
Consider giving Kudos, if you find worth it :) !!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Aug 2016
Posts: 36
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q47 V21
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Nov 2016, 18:31
daagh wrote:
E means that WEF is trying to explain the cause of the rise in temporary employment by stating that the employers have switched to temporary people due to some X and Y factors. Whereas D says that the act of putting the employers in the fore itself is causing the rise. Hope the difference between D and E is clear.


Ok Got It!!!

In E:- Result:- Act of putting Employers in Fore , Why(Reason):- Rise in temp Emp ---> Logically correct
In D:- Result:- Rise in temp Emp , Why(Reason):- Act of putting Employers in Fore ---> Logically Incorrect


Please correct if i am still wrong !!! :)
_________________
Consider giving Kudos, if you find worth it :) !!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 May 2017
Posts: 9
Location: United States (AZ)
Concentration: Human Resources
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V28
GPA: 3.8
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2017, 10:16
AbhiGarg2007 wrote:
daagh wrote:
E means that WEF is trying to explain the cause of the rise in temporary employment by stating that the employers have switched to temporary people due to some X and Y factors. Whereas D says that the act of putting the employers in the fore itself is causing the rise. Hope the difference between D and E is clear.


Ok Got It!!!

In E:- Result:- Act of putting Employers in Fore , Why(Reason):- Rise in temp Emp ---> Logically correct
In D:- Result:- Rise in temp Emp , Why(Reason):- Act of putting Employers in Fore ---> Logically Incorrect


Please correct if i am still wrong !!! :)


how to know whether it is purpose or the result of sth?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5104
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2017, 11:14
1
Top Contributor
D) the World Economic Forum has put employers in the fore, contributing
It is not the WEF's action of putting the employers in the fore is causing the rise in the temporary employment. WEF is simply a monitoring body and an analyst. It is only reporting that the employers are prima facie responsible for the increase in temporary employment because the employers know well that these temporary employees have no bargaining power.

Therefore, as in D, contributing to the rise is not the result of the previous clause.

I couldn't quite get what exactly is the purpose involved in this reporting.
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't make out how to pole-vault over the 630-barrier, you can do so with my one-to-one lessons. (+919884544509)
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 May 2015
Posts: 39
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2017, 00:10
burnrohan wrote:
Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bargaining strength of employees, the World Economic Forum putting employers in the fore for contributing to the rise in temporary employment.

(A) the World Economic Forum putting employers in the fore for contributing
(B) employers have been put in the fore by the World Economic Forum, contributing
(C) employers have been put in the fore by the World Economic Forum, which contributes
(D) the World Economic Forum has put employers in the fore, contributing
(E) the World Economic Forum has put employers in the fore for contributing


Answer Choice E)

This corrects the SV error in original sentence.
It also conveys the intended meaning of sentences. That WEO has put employers in fore for contributing to the rise in unemployement

Answer D distort the meaning of the sentence.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Posts: 429
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2018, 04:33
Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bargaining strength of employees, the World Economic Forum putting employers in the fore for contributing to the rise in temporary employment.

(A) the World Economic Forum putting employers in the fore for contributing --> no independent clause
(B) employers have been put in the fore by the World Economic Forum, contributing --> Wrong: "Citing ..., employers.." Correct: "Citing ..., the World Economic Forum.."
(C) employers have been put in the fore by the World Economic Forum, which contributes --> same as B
(D) the World Economic Forum has put employers in the fore, contributing --> the World Economic Forum can't contribute to the rise in temporary employement
(E) the World Economic Forum has put employers in the fore for contributing --> correct
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5929
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2019, 09:10
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar   [#permalink] 02 Oct 2019, 09:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Citing relevant evidence of fluctuating product demand and reduced bar

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne