Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:33 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:33
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
StillON
Joined: 10 Jun 2020
Last visit: 16 Oct 2021
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111
Posts: 15
Kudos: 5
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 950
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 950
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 950
Own Kudos:
208
 [1]
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 950
Kudos: 208
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DonBosco7
Joined: 03 Mar 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Products:
Posts: 81
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kurtosis
City Financial Manager: While the city budget for children’s programs continues to rise, children make up a markedly smaller percentage of our population compared to ten and twenty years ago. Given that fact, fewer programs for children are necessary and we can consequently cut expenditures for such programs.

Which of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) Without budget cuts, the city will be unable to maintain its current level of services.

(B) The city’s population has not declined sharply over the past two decades.

(C) Children’s programs are an important factor in the decisions of families that consider moving to the city.

(D) There has not been a significant increase in the number of adults living in the city.

(E) Many of the children’s programs in the city are underutilized by the current population.

I Apologize beforehand if this offends anyone, but it's just one fun way of looking at things 😁

The Argument given is that, since the children make up a smaller percentage of our population compared to ten and twenty years ago, hence we should reduce the number of children related programs and hence cut down budget expenditure on such programs.

Now, look at Option 'D' and negate it.
negation D:- There has been a significant increase in the number of adults living in the city.

-> what this means is that, since there has been an increase in number of adults, these adults will fornicate and hence will produce more children, thereby increasing the number of children and consequently needing more of those children programs which the manager is talking about cutting down, and hence weakening his conclusion that " fewer programs for children are necessary and we can consequently cut expenditures for such programs. "
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts