Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
38%
(02:09)
correct 62%
(02:13)
wrong
based on 246
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Clinical checkups after the first and second trimesters of pregnancy were introduced to Country X four years ago. Medical experts claim that the following reduction of 35% in cases of premature labor, one of the main causes of still birth in Country X, is directly connected to the aforementioned clinical checkups.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the medical experts' claim?
A. The clinical checkups were intended for the early identification of women who are at risk of post-natal depression, and not for premature labor prevention.
B. Four years ago, a dozen hospitals in Country X were given new equipment to facilitate the extraction of new-born babies, thus lowering significantly the number of still births.
C. The cessation of hostilities in Country X coincided with the introduction of clinics offering checkups to pregnant women, and women in war zones are more prone to go into early labor.
D. Eight years ago, the UN launched a campaign in Country X promoting the use of medicine to reduce the cases of infections of the urinary tract, following which the percentage of woman going into premature labor was reduced by 30%.
E. Women throughout the world, including those in Country X, go into premature labor, inevitably resulting in a certain percentage of still births.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Eliminate B and E because they are irrelevant. Eliminate C because it strengthens the argument. Eliminate D because we do not know when the reduction happened. It could have happened 7 years ago.
A remains and is the correct answer.
The statements tells us the purpose of these clinical check ups. Yes, it could be possible that there may have been a reduction in no of premature births as a result of it, but then it would not be a direct result of these check ups.
A Eliminate —> post-natal depression professionals are likely to bring in interdisciplinary expertise and refer the client to a premature labor prevention specialist if necessary. Doctors are generalists and any clinical check up will help consequently.
B —> Most correct as it introduces a second factor that could have caused the decline.
Clinical checkups after the first and second trimesters of pregnancy were introduced to Country X four years ago. Medical experts claim that the following reduction of 35% in cases of premature labor, one of the main causes of still birth in Country X, is directly connected to the aforementioned clinical checkups.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the medical experts' claim?
A. The clinical checkups were intended for the early identification of women who are at risk of post-natal depression, and not for premature labor prevention. Incorrect
it contradicts with argument; Although they were not intended for early identification of women who are at risk of post-natal depression, they can be helpful to reduce still birth
B. Four years ago, a dozen hospitals in Country X were given new equipment to facilitate the extraction of new-born babies, thus lowering significantly the number of still births. Correct
still birth reduce not for clinical checkups but for new equipment
C. The cessation of hostilities in Country X coincided with the introduction of clinics offering checkups to pregnant women, and women in war zones are more prone to go into early labor. Incorrect
not relevant
D. Eight years ago, the UN launched a campaign in Country X promoting the use of medicine to reduce the cases of infections of the urinary tract, following which the percentage of woman going into premature labor was reduced by 30%. Incorrect
eight years ago fact is irrelevant
E. Women throughout the world, including those in Country X, go into premature labor, inevitably resulting in a certain percentage of still births. Irrelevant
hey someone please provide rationale for option A , why A is incorrect and why Option C is correct
Show more
Medical expert's claim is that the reduction of 35% in cases of premature labor is directly connected to the clinical check ups.
A tells us that the purpose of those clinical check ups were to identify PND cases and not for premature labor prevention . But it is perfectly possible that as an indirect result of those check ups, the doctors were able to identify PL cases, consequently, leading to reduction in such cases.
(I chose A because I confused the words 'directly connected to' in the conclusion, which I have mentioned above, with 'is a direct result of'. )
Where as C tell us that another event, the end of war, happened at the same time these check ups were started. The statement goes on further to explain that women in war zones tend to go into early labor (maybe it was the anxiety or lack of nutrition that was causing the premature labor), so it is quite possible that once the war ended the women stopped going into early labor. Now, we have an alternate possibility for why there was a reduction in premature labor cases and that makes us believe a little less in the expert's claim that those medical check ups led to the reduction.
A. The clinical checkups were intended for the early identification of women who are at risk of post-natal depression, and not for premature labor prevention. -> Completely irrelevant. First of all, this option does not undermine the claim. Also the intention of the checkups do not matter here. Outcome is imp.
B. Four years ago, a dozen hospitals in Country X were given new equipment to facilitate the extraction of new-born babies, thus lowering significantly the number of still births. -> Close. But this option mentions that the new equipment was given only to a dozen hospital, whereas the reduction was across country. Also a 35% reduction is a pretty huge number. This option does not undermine the authors claim only because a dozen hospital do not seem to be. amjor contributor in reducing premature labours across the country.
C. The cessation of hostilities in Country X coincided with the introduction of clinics offering checkups to pregnant women, and women in war zones are more prone to go into early labor. ->This gives us another cause/ reason for the reduction in the premature labour across the country. Keep this option.
D. Eight years ago, the UN launched a campaign in Country X promoting the use of medicine to reduce the cases of infections of the urinary tract, following which the percentage of woman going into premature labor was reduced by 30%. -> This was 8 years ago, but the reduction mentioned in the claim started around 4 years back. So we do not have enough information here to defnitely say that instead of the clinical checkups, there was a different reason responsible for the reduction.
E. Women throughout the world, including those in Country X, go into premature labor, inevitably resulting in a certain percentage of still births. -> Doesn’t help at all. Directly eliminate.
Now we may argue that option C doesn’t state how much of the country was under war zone and if the number of women that are prone to go into early labor in this area form a significant proportion of the country's women, but this seems to be the strongest option amongst all. Also this is a question where we have to pick the best choice which would undermine the given claim. Answer: C
because it's not giving an alternate cause , it says clinical checkups were responsible
it's not saying anything different than what is given in the stem
CodingGmat
A. The clinical checkups were intended for the early identification of women who are at risk of post-natal depression, and not for premature labor prevention. -> Completely irrelevant. First of all, this option does not undermine the claim. Also the intention of the checkups do not matter here. Outcome is imp.
B. Four years ago, a dozen hospitals in Country X were given new equipment to facilitate the extraction of new-born babies, thus lowering significantly the number of still births. -> Close. But this option mentions that the new equipment was given only to a dozen hospital, whereas the reduction was across country. Also a 35% reduction is a pretty huge number. This option does not undermine the authors claim only because a dozen hospital do not seem to be. amjor contributor in reducing premature labours across the country.
C. The cessation of hostilities in Country X coincided with the introduction of clinics offering checkups to pregnant women, and women in war zones are more prone to go into early labor. ->This gives us another cause/ reason for the reduction in the premature labour across the country. Keep this option.
D. Eight years ago, the UN launched a campaign in Country X promoting the use of medicine to reduce the cases of infections of the urinary tract, following which the percentage of woman going into premature labor was reduced by 30%. -> This was 8 years ago, but the reduction mentioned in the claim started around 4 years back. So we do not have enough information here to defnitely say that instead of the clinical checkups, there was a different reason responsible for the reduction.
E. Women throughout the world, including those in Country X, go into premature labor, inevitably resulting in a certain percentage of still births. -> Doesn’t help at all. Directly eliminate.
Now we may argue that option C doesn’t state how much of the country was under war zone and if the number of women that are prone to go into early labor in this area form a significant proportion of the country's women, but this seems to be the strongest option amongst all. Also this is a question where we have to pick the best choice which would undermine the given claim. Answer: C
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.