It is currently 15 Dec 2017, 04:28

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Wharton R1 | Stanford R1 | Tuck R1 | Ross R1 | Haas R1 | UCLA R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Company X experienced a sharp decrease

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 03 Jul 2014
Posts: 59

Kudos [?]: 88 [1], given: 16

Concentration: Operations, General Management
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Company X experienced a sharp decrease [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2016, 22:03
1
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

73% (01:01) correct 27% (01:06) wrong based on 201 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Company X experienced a sharp decrease in profitability last year. The CEO believes that the best way to increase profitability is to fire 20 employees. The CFO, on the other hand, believes that no employees should be fired, but that all employees should take a salary cut.

Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to the CFO's claim?

A. There are currently 35 employees in Company X.
B. Firing 20 employees will lower the company's expenses by more than 30 percent.
C. The average salary in Company X is significantly lower than that of its competitors.
D. The workload in Company X has been gradually increasing over the past few years.
E. If salaries are lowered, employee morale and, consequently, productivity will suffer.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________


+1 kudos, if you like the post :wink:

Kudos [?]: 88 [1], given: 16

SVP
SVP
User avatar
B
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1903

Kudos [?]: 550 [0], given: 23

Re: Company X experienced a sharp decrease [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2016, 22:31
prasadyanz wrote:
Company X experienced a sharp decrease in profitability last year. The CEO believes that the best way to increase profitability is to fire 20 employees. The CFO, on the other hand, believes that no employees should be fired, but that all employees should take a salary cut.

Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to the CFO's claim?

A. There are currently 35 employees in Company X.
B. Firing 20 employees will lower the company's expenses by more than 30 percent.
C. The average salary in Company X is significantly lower than that of its competitors.
D. The workload in Company X has been gradually increasing over the past few years.
E. If salaries are lowered, employee morale and, consequently, productivity will suffer.


Premise: Company has experienced a decrease in profitability
CEO's belief: Fire 20 employees to increase profitability
CFO's belief: All employees should take a salary cut.

We need to support the CFO's claim and refute the CEO's claim.
If we show that firing the employees might have a negative effect, then our job is done.
Option D says just the same. There is already an increasing work load and firing people will increase it even more. This might not be beneficial for the company.

Correct Option: D

Kudos [?]: 550 [0], given: 23

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jan 2016
Posts: 78

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 48

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
Premium Member
Re: Company X experienced a sharp decrease [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2016, 22:32
Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to the CFO's claim?
Goal: Strengthen the CFO claim that employee should be not fired.
Pre-thinking: Company will not be able to handle the existing workload with reduced workforce and result in more loss.

Answer D says the that workload will increase. So, we need employee to run the business.

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 48

Director
Director
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 585

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 231

Location: United States (LA)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Company X experienced a sharp decrease [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2016, 13:59
After initial read there seems a to be a slight confusion,but after a through reading we get the correct answer as option D

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 231

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1354

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1410

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Company X experienced a sharp decrease [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2017, 22:09
I have searched for reviews on contents of questions from Economist Gmat, but the result is negative. There are no reviews; people only discuss about Tutor of Economist gmat.

I believe most of questions from Economist Gmat do not look like gmat-like questions.

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1410

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Mar 2017
Posts: 31

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 8

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GPA: 2.79
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge
Re: Company X experienced a sharp decrease [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2017, 05:20
prasadyanz wrote:
Company X experienced a sharp decrease in profitability last year. The CEO believes that the best way to increase profitability is to fire 20 employees. The CFO, on the other hand, believes that no employees should be fired, but that all employees should take a salary cut.

Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to the CFO's claim?

A. There are currently 35 employees in Company X.- not conclusive data
B. Firing 20 employees will lower the company's expenses by more than 30 percent.- Strengthening CEO claim
C. The average salary in Company X is significantly lower than that of its competitors.-Already lower salary means it will not be reducing expenses possible weakener
D. The workload in Company X has been gradually increasing over the past few years. --Correct Workload increase means firing employees may lower productivity/profitability
E. If salaries are lowered, employee morale and, consequently, productivity will suffer.
- Weakener

CEO- Firing 20 employees
CFO- salary cut.
Answer should justify CFO claim or weakens the CFO claim, D is the answer

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 8

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2017
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Re: Company X experienced a sharp decrease [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2017, 08:34
Company X experienced a sharp decrease in profitability last year. The CEO believes that the best way to increase
profitability is to fire 20 employees. The CFO, on the other hand, believes that no employees should be fired, but that
all employees should take a salary cut.

Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to the CFO's claim?

A. There are currently 35 employees in Company X.
{incorrect: as per CEO, we fire 20 employees, then only 15 is left, but we don't know whether remaining 15 employees are
sufficient.}


B. Firing 20 employees will lower the company's expenses by more than 30 percent.
{incorrect: don't know whether 30 percent decreased expenses is sufficient to increase profitability}

C. The average salary in Company X is significantly lower than that of its competitors.
{incorrect: avg salary is already lower than competitors and salary cut will hurt even more}

D. The workload in Company X has been gradually increasing over the past few years.
{correct: workload is increasing, with 20 employees fired, workload will increase even more. Hence CFO's claim is better}

E. If salaries are lowered, employee morale and, consequently, productivity will suffer.
{incorrect: if productivity suffers, then profitability will decrease, not increase}

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Re: Company X experienced a sharp decrease   [#permalink] 27 Nov 2017, 08:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Company X experienced a sharp decrease

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.