Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 02:41 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 02:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
jim441
Joined: 29 Apr 2022
Last visit: 14 Dec 2023
Posts: 193
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 276
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35 (Online)
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35 (Online)
Posts: 193
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,302
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,302
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
RiyaJ0032
Joined: 13 Dec 2021
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 201
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 201
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But how do you infer B to be the answer

where is it given that economy was stagnant or in relative decline

1840's we only know that -

a) the social fabric changed
b) Many people were kept out of prosperity

but does this mean that economy was stagnant?

KarishmaB please help

or any expert,
cjmoore16
Sunaina7

4. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following was true of Concord’s economy in the 1840s?

(A) Manufacturing was a growing industry, overtaking farming in importance.
(B) The economy likely was stagnant or in decline relative to the previous decade.
(C) Land ownership among adult males was on the rise.
(D) The sale and consumption of alcohol declined sharply.

This question tripped me up too. When narrowing down to A and B I went for A because "manufacturing was humming" and thus indicating it was growing. However, upon further inspection, recognizing that manufacturing is an industry that would contribute to economic prosperity (if manufacturing was growing) and since Concord had reached "its political and economic pinnacle", you can safely say that manufacturing was not growing. Nor does the passage mention it overtook farming; it could be a small component that did experienced accelerated growth, but then plateaued.

In case C, D , or E tripped you up, here is my view

C - Passage states that "64% of adult males were landless", however, there is no indication that this is growing into the 1840s
D - I associated the temperance with the drinking associated with work related activities and goes too far to say that it had a sharp decline on alcohol sales overall and thus had an effect on the economy
E - Think about the labor that is used to build a home. People used to freely help one another but now people paid others to construct buildings (as mentioned in the third paragraph). This does not mean the rate increased or decreased, it just means the expectation of "free" community labor changed

Hope this helps.
User avatar
chillblade
Joined: 12 Nov 2024
Last visit: 22 Jul 2025
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 7
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Check 1st line of 2nd paragraph.

" A decade later, by the mid-1830s, with over two thousand inhabitants, Concord was probably at its political and economic pinnacle "

Pinnacle means highest point. Therefore, 1840s wasn't as prosperous economically as 1830s.
RiyaJ0032
But how do you infer B to be the answer

where is it given that economy was stagnant or in relative decline

1840's we only know that -

a) the social fabric changed
b) Many people were kept out of prosperity

but does this mean that economy was stagnant?

KarishmaB please help

or any expert,
cjmoore16
Sunaina7

4. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following was true of Concord’s economy in the 1840s?

(A) Manufacturing was a growing industry, overtaking farming in importance.
(B) The economy likely was stagnant or in decline relative to the previous decade.
(C) Land ownership among adult males was on the rise.
(D) The sale and consumption of alcohol declined sharply.

This question tripped me up too. When narrowing down to A and B I went for A because "manufacturing was humming" and thus indicating it was growing. However, upon further inspection, recognizing that manufacturing is an industry that would contribute to economic prosperity (if manufacturing was growing) and since Concord had reached "its political and economic pinnacle", you can safely say that manufacturing was not growing. Nor does the passage mention it overtook farming; it could be a small component that did experienced accelerated growth, but then plateaued.

In case C, D , or E tripped you up, here is my view

C - Passage states that "64% of adult males were landless", however, there is no indication that this is growing into the 1840s
D - I associated the temperance with the drinking associated with work related activities and goes too far to say that it had a sharp decline on alcohol sales overall and thus had an effect on the economy
E - Think about the labor that is used to build a home. People used to freely help one another but now people paid others to construct buildings (as mentioned in the third paragraph). This does not mean the rate increased or decreased, it just means the expectation of "free" community labor changed

Hope this helps.
User avatar
suman94
Joined: 01 May 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Products:
Posts: 9
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The modern capitalist arrangement is mentioned in the context of farm work, more specifically, the change in working methods. The result is the cutting of camaraderie or previous ties between people, or social values. However, does it amount to a change in social structure?

Landowning patterns and the wealth disparity, as mentioned in the first few sentences of the paragraph, can be considered as a change in social structure. However, it is not clear from the passage how it is related to the change in farm working methods.

bM22
ravigupta2912
Not convinced with Q5. The question is about the purpose of a noun entity i.e. "modern capitalistic arrangements". The function of the noun entity is to present a contrast.

The function of the sentence "On the farms, the old work customs—the huskings, roof-raisings, and apple bees—by which people cooperated to complete essential chores gave way to modern capitalist arrangements." is to illustrate a change but the function of that sentence cannot be reduced to a mere phrase.

I am being precise with the question here. Thoughts anyone?


Hi ravigupta2912,

Quote:
(A) Illustrate one aspect of a change in the town’s social structure

Consider the lines: "The ties that once joined neighbors together were fraying. On the farms, the old work customs—the huskings, roof-raisings, and apple bees—by which people cooperated to complete essential chores gave way to modern capitalist arrangements. When men needed help, they hired it, and paid the going rate, which no longer included the traditional ration of grog. With a new zeal for temperance, employers abandoned the custom of drinking with workers in what had been a ritual display of camaraderie.".

We are not asked a mere function of the phrase, but implicitly what changes did “modern capitalist arrangements” bring. Now though the phrase is mentioned as a result of some changes in practices, but what did it bring with itself were the distinctions between the people. How earlier there was trust, friendship among people and how it changed to arrangements on basis on requirements, in turn implying that the town’s social structure had changed.

Hope This Helps.
Thanks.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts