Hey,
How did the GMAT go?
I was giving one of
MGMAT's CAT and was highly surprised to see that that even after getting 25 qns in the range of 700-800 & 11 qns in the range of 600-700 in verbal, I finally ended up with a meagre score of 29.
What I'm trying to get at is that if a test taker is not performing well in a section and assuming that the test is adaptive then the way the difficulty of questions are selected in
MGMAT's CAT is faulty. I felt that the test wasn't even adaptive to begin with and the pool of questions was selected as soon as I started the test (hope I'm wrong here).
While I was giving the test and by judging from the difficulty level of the questions I felt that I had performed pretty well in the verbal section, but it just turned out to be a fool's paradise.
All in all I'm a bit disappointed with the
MGMAT CATs and looking forward to explore other opportunities that can somehow mimic the real GMAT more closely.
Feedbacks are welcome.
Cheers!