PriyanshuR
For question 2, I thought the answer was B, because "rapid adoption of agriculture in this area to mark the end of the Mesolithic era and the beginning of the Neolithic era."
also option D starts with "Coastal communities were
decimated", delimitation is not really mentioned any where
Looking at your reasoning, I can see why you're confused between options B and D. Let me help clarify the key distinction you need to make here.
Understanding Direct vs. Indirect Results
The question specifically asks for a
direct result of the rising sea levels. This is crucial for choosing the right answer. Let's trace the causal chain from the passage:
Rising sea levels (the cause)
- 145,000 people displaced from coastal areas (immediate/direct result)
- Displaced farmers moved inland (direct result)
- Farmers shared agricultural practices with hunter-gatherers (secondary result)
- Rapid expansion of farming occurred (tertiary result)
- Historians mark this as the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition (interpretation of events)
Why Option B is Incorrect:
You're right that the passage mentions "rapid adoption of agriculture in this area to mark the end of the Mesolithic era and the beginning of the Neolithic era." However, this is an
indirect result—it's several steps removed from the rising sea levels. The passage says this migration
"may have been" a major factor in farming expansion, which historians
then use to mark the era transition. That's multiple levels of causation away from the flood itself.
Why Option D is Correct:Your concern about "decimated" is understandable—the passage doesn't use this exact word. However, in GMAT RC, we need to focus on the
essence of what happened rather than exact word matching.
Consider:
- The passage states 145,000 people were displaced
- These were coastal communities that had to abandon their homes
- They were forced to move inland
"Decimated" here means the communities were severely disrupted or destroyed
as communities—not necessarily that people died, but that their way of life in those locations ended. The displaced farmers literally "had to find new places to live" (moved inland), which the passage explicitly states.
Key GMAT Strategy:When you see "direct result" or "immediate consequence" in a question, trace the causal chain and pick the answer that's
closest to the initial cause. Options that are several steps removed in the chain are usually incorrect, even if they're mentioned in the passage.
Quick Check Method: Ask yourself: "Could this have happened
without any intermediate steps?"
For option D, yes—rising waters directly force people to leave.
For option B, no—you need displacement → migration → farming spread → historical interpretation.