Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics' lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the company's mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try. In the consultant's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles? A. The first is the consultant's main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion. B. The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultant's own explanation of that finding. C. The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true. D. The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultant's explanation of that contrast. E. The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultant's explanation of that contrast. CR65030.02

Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:54

It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:54

Toolkit

Critical Reasoning (CR)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Nov 20
UCR MBA Impact - Live Q&A with UCR AdCom & Student
07:30 AM PST
-
08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 22
GMAT RC Masterclass
11:00 AM IST
-
01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Nov 23
Conquer Algebra on the GMAT Focus Edition
11:00 AM IST
-
01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
Nov 25
Try OnDemand GMAT Masterclass
10:00 AM EST
-
11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of

1 2

madhavbhaskar

Joined: 26 Aug 2019

Last visit: 19 Nov 2025

Posts: 3

Given Kudos: 22

Posts: 3

Kudos: 0

29 Sep 2025, 06:35

Kudos

Bookmarks

You said, why D is wrong, but is infact the correct answer stated.
I am more confused

In fact I tried to ChatGPT the correct answer and with explanation and got a similar output.
Can someone check if D is indeed correct ?

egmat

madhavbhaskar

Your analysis of option B is actually on the right track! Let me help clarify the specific point that's causing confusion.

The Key Insight:
"That finding" in option B refers to the original phenomenon that needs explaining: Why do complex repairs fail initially but succeed when redone?

Understanding the Two Explanations:

Rejected explanation: Mechanics lack competence (disproven by BF1 - same mechanics do it right the second time)
Consultant's explanation (BF2): Mechanics don't apply enough focused attention the first time, but do apply it to redos

Where Your Thinking Got Tangled:
You wrote: "the second is not explaining 'mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics' lack of competence' but is in fact explaining why the above is not the case"

Actually, the second boldface IS explaining the same core finding - just offering a different explanation. Both the rejected theory (incompetence) and the consultant's theory (lack of focused attention) are attempting to explain the same phenomenon: initial failures followed by successful redos.

Why D is Wrong:
The first boldface doesn't present a "contrast" - it presents evidence (successful redos prove competence exists). A contrast would be comparing two different situations; here we have one observation being used as evidence.

Pattern Recognition:
When you see "that finding" in answer choices, it refers to the central phenomenon the entire argument is trying to explain - not to intermediate conclusions or rejections.

I hope this helps!

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 19 Nov 2025

Posts: 7,443

Own Kudos:

69,786

Given Kudos: 2,060

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,443

Kudos: 69,786

10 Oct 2025, 13:05

Kudos

Bookmarks

madhavbhaskar

Main confusion was in B and D, my thought and direction:

Looking at B deeper and break in 2 parts:

The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding;

evidence: when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right rejecting on explanation of "a certain finding"
i.e. rejecting that "mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics' lack of competence".

the second is the consultant's own explanation of that finding.

the second is not explaining that"mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics' lack of competence"
but is infact explaining why the above is not the case

Maybe the consultant's own explanation of ~~that finding~~ evidence would atleast be in the correct direction.

Is this chain of thought correct ?

The first problem with your explanation is that you're using the same thing for both the evidence and the finding. If the "finding" is that "Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes," then we can't say that this same thing is also part of the "evidence" for rejecting an explanation of itself.

You could say that the first BF is a finding. One possible explanation of that finding is that "mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics' lack of competence." But the evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting that explanation comes at the beginning of the second sentence: "we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs."

So while the second half of choice (B) is okay, the first half doesn't work. For more on why (D) is a better option, check out these posts: