Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 22:13 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 22:13
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
anonymousegmat
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Last visit: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
29
Posts: 300
Kudos: 29
cornell mba 05 Oct 2007, 10:48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So I got an invitation to apply to Cornell's Park Fellowship program today and it really threw me for a loop. Here's why:

I've been planning on getting a PhD for quite some time, and the more I though about what kind of skills I would need for a PhD the less I wanted to get an MBA. To me the MBA is a very general professional degree that prepares you to get a job in industry...

PhD=researcher... so I started to look at specialized Master's programs that would give me lots of classes in statistics and psychology. The schools I applied to are all decent schools (but not top tier by any means) with a masters programs in Marketing Research (there are only 7 or 8 schools in the country with this major.)

So my conundrum is this - if I apply to Cornell, get accepted, and get this funding, do I go?? I am almost afraid to apply, because if I do get the funding it will be one of the most difficult decisions in my life.

Will the name brand MBA with largely irrelevent and unfocused coursework (IMHO) stand out more and get me into a PhD program over a highly focused specialized masters? (Keep in mind Cornell was one of the schools I would apply to for PhD program - my top PhD program choices right now are Ross, Stern, Cornell - of course this will probably change as my research interests develop further)

Part of my confusion is many PhD programs expect me to have the full calculus sequence as well as linear algebra. I can squeeze this in at University of Georgia or Baruch, but I don't see it happening elsewhere...

So my questions to all you PhD students on the board:

What grad degrees did you guys/gals have before applying to PhD programs?

What are your opinions on the well known MBA vs. lesser known quant heavy MS enroute to PhD?

Am I being too myopic in thinking that classes in financial accounting, entreperneurship, leadership and management will be of no use to someone who will be studying the behavioral side of marketing?

Is it better to be a big fish in small pond or vice versa? I figured that I would really be able to stand out at some of the lesser known schools and link up with a professor to work on some research... my view of cornell is that all the students there are top notch, so it would be much harder to stand out as the exceptional student and impress the pants off a professor.
avatar
tkkoh
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Last visit: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 412
Own Kudos:
23
Posts: 412
Kudos: 23
cornell mba 05 Oct 2007, 20:18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is one guy in my PhD cohort who has completed his MBA just this summer. Another guy completed his first year MBA and is now doing PhD. For are in finance.

You can do quant courses during your MBA, and it you get the fellowship, that's a good bonus.

All the best!
User avatar
hobbit
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Last visit: 04 Jul 2012
Posts: 261
Own Kudos:
362
Posts: 261
Kudos: 362
cornell mba 05 Oct 2007, 20:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i never got an MBA and never even considered it. most of the stuff in MBA is just boring in my opinion, and completely irrelevant to my research interests.
my MA is in musicology (so completely unrrelated to what i do), but I have B.Sc. in math so i did all the calculus/algebra sequences that you can imagine on my undergrad.

in my humble opinion - if you are very focused on getting a PHD, getting an MBA is a complete waste of time. instead dtry to join as research assitstant somewhere, or alternatively get an MA/MS degree in subject related to your research interests i.e. economics, psychology, sociology, information systems, cognitive science... all maybe relevant in your later studies.

I talked last week with a second year MBA here at wharton. he said to me: "MBA programs, especially the more prestigious, are basically recuitment/placement agencies (very sophisticated and highly connected), that provide some training as part of the placement process".

I can't agree more to that.
avatar
bauble
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Last visit: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
5
Posts: 76
Kudos: 5
cornell mba 05 Oct 2007, 21:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hobbit's generally right. However, I will say that there is some value to the MBA route you propose, but not in the way that you describe. Basically, going to Cornell for your MBA may give you connections to profs who can help you out in your Ph.D. quest. The MBA in and of itself doesn't mean much in terms of getting accepted to a Ph.D. program (I could be wrong here, but I have a strong sense that this is the case). How do you get these connections? Engage the prof about his research and talk intelligently about it. Doing well in your classes helps too. As far as standing out in a good MBA program, you're onto something here as well, but again, not in the way that you describe. At least three things and the interactions between them conspire against standing out: 1) students are articulate and reasonably bright, as you suggest 2) a lot of the classes aren't quantitative, and there is sometimes a strong team component to the grade, and 3) the level of difficulty of the material isn't high enough to provide meaningful separation for Ph.D. level assessment.

As for the big fish small fish theory you suggest, you might be right. At a non-top place, you might stick out so far ahead of others that you overcome the three points I mentioned above. On the other hand, I am also not so sure that you have to stick out so far to work with a prof. I don't know how other profs view this, but as a prof in the making, I would use MBA performance as only a rough barometer. If the person is, say, in the top third of the class, seems to be intelligent, and seems to like research, I'd consider enlisting their help. It might be useful to ask a prof or two on their sense of the opportunities available to MBA students. MBA admissions might be able to plug you in to profs who are amenable to answering your questions.

The relevant masters is also a very good option.
Moderator:
said.tojiboev
PhD Forum Moderator
65 posts