Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 23:06 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 23:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
alimad
Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 466
Own Kudos:
Posts: 466
Kudos: 4,334
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sunny143
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Last visit: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Posts: 121
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
diehard4
Joined: 06 Feb 2008
Last visit: 17 Aug 2008
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Posts: 36
Kudos: 359
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
pmenon
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Last visit: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 692
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 692
Kudos: 600
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i think its D. the oceanographers conclusion is that plankton concentrations are low because of lack of iron. the question basically asks us to find the reason against concluding why this may not be the case .... D gives a reason why the oceanographers theory may be true, but wasnt demonstrated
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 858
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 858
Kudos: 7,460
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A for me,

D does strengthen the hypothis!
User avatar
anirudhoswal
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Last visit: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Schools:Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)
Posts: 47
Kudos: 103
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO - D.
User avatar
bhatiagp
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Last visit: 06 Jan 2021
Posts: 371
Own Kudos:
116
 [1]
Concentration: General Management , Strategy
Products:
Posts: 371
Kudos: 116
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D IMO.
User avatar
dipenambalia
Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Last visit: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Posts: 10
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO D.
User avatar
gmat2ndtime
Joined: 16 Mar 2008
Last visit: 15 Jul 2009
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Posts: 50
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO D . The only options which does not weakens the oceanographers hypothesis ..others do .

E "The iron compounds released into the area occur naturally in areas of the ocean
where plankton thrive." says that the iron rich compounds needed for the planktons occur naturally ...but does it mean that if given artificially they will not help planktons to survive ?

A "Not all of the nitrogen compounds that are sometimes found in relatively high
concentrations in the oceans are nutrients for plankton."

Although a good one ..got confused between A & D , but in the end choose D since A says that not all of the compunds found in high concentration are nutrients for plankton , but it does not says that the compounds which are necessary are not found in those areas ....
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 858
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 858
Kudos: 7,460
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Second thought, D. :lol: misguided by question!
User avatar
yavasani
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Last visit: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Posts: 66
Kudos: 813
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
Please provide some explaination Thanks:

Q19:
Plankton generally thrive in areas of the ocean with sufficient concentrations of certain
nitrogen compounds near the surface, where plankton live. Nevertheless, some areas,
though rich in these nitrogen compounds, have few plankton. These areas have
particularly low concentrations of iron, and oceanographers hypothesize that this shortage
of iron prevents plankton from thriving. However, an experimental release of iron
compounds into one such area failed to produce a thriving plankton population, even
though local iron concentrations increased immediately.
Which of the following, if true, argues most strongly against concluding, on the basis of
the information above, that the oceanographers’ hypothesis is false?

A. Not all of the nitrogen compounds that are sometimes found in relatively high
concentrations in the oceans are nutrients for plankton.
B. Certain areas of the ocean support an abundance of plankton despite having
particularly low concentrations of iron.
C. The release of the iron compounds did not increase the supply of nitrogen
compounds in the area.
D. A few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the
iron-rich water from the surface.

E. The iron compounds released into the area occur naturally in areas of the ocean
where plankton thrive.
Answer:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
DFG5150
Joined: 06 May 2008
Last visit: 20 Feb 2011
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 19
Kudos: 66
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A for me... whats the OA?
User avatar
gkalidasu
Joined: 27 May 2008
Last visit: 04 Jul 2008
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Q19:
Plankton generally thrive in areas of the ocean with sufficient concentrations of certain
nitrogen compounds near the surface, where plankton live. Nevertheless, some areas,
though rich in these nitrogen compounds, have few plankton. These areas have
particularly low concentrations of iron, and oceanographers hypothesize that this shortage
of iron prevents plankton from thriving. However, an experimental release of iron
compounds into one such area failed to produce a thriving plankton population, even
though local iron concentrations increased immediately.

Which of the following, if true, argues most strongly against concluding, on the basis of
the information above, that the oceanographers’ hypothesis is false?

A. Not all of the nitrogen compounds that are sometimes found in relatively high
concentrations in the oceans are nutrients for plankton.
B. Certain areas of the ocean support an abundance of plankton despite having
particularly low concentrations of iron.
C. The release of the iron compounds did not increase the supply of nitrogen
compounds in the area.
D. A few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the
iron-rich water from the surface.
E. The iron compounds released into the area occur naturally in areas of the ocean
where plankton thrive.

****
1. The question specifically asks about a statement that counters the implicit conclusion from the passage - "The oceanographers’ hypothesis is false because even the introduction of iron did not induce plankton population surge".

2. This means the possible answer should include a phrase that states that Iron does help the plankton population growth.

3. Now let us review the answers one by one:

A. Not all of the nitrogen compounds that are sometimes found in relatively high
concentrations in the oceans are nutrients for plankton.
*This helps our analysis because it questions altogether the nitogen source it self but doesnot say anything about Iron involvement - hence can be eliminated.
*
B. Certain areas of the ocean support an abundance of plankton despite having
particularly low concentrations of iron.
*This can be eliminated directly as it doesnot say anything that supports our claim.*

C. The release of the iron compounds did not increase the supply of nitrogen
compounds in the area.
*This actually supports the implicit conclusion of the author hence can be eliminated"

D. A few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the
iron-rich water from the surface.
*This counters the conclusion that iron is not present for thriving plankton population" - Best choice till now.

E. The iron compounds released into the area occur naturally in areas of the ocean
where plankton thrive.
*This doesnot provide any additional information other than the information inferred from the Oceanographer's hypothesis. - can be eliminated.*

So, it can be safely concluded that the best answer is D.
User avatar
gmat blows
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Last visit: 24 Jul 2010
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
Posts: 112
Kudos: 672
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad

D. A few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the
iron-rich water from the surface.
E. The iron compounds released into the area occur naturally in areas of the ocean
where plankton thrive.
Answer:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I was between D and E.

in D, I didnt like the 'a few days after' note - what if planktons thrive immediately after iron compounds are released, even before the currents can displace them? (i know, thats a stetech...(
in E, i feel the subtle use of 'naturally' implies something. maybe the researchers are not using the 'right' iron compound for planktons to thrive?

I chose E. whats the OA?



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts