It is currently 15 Dec 2017, 21:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR - Mr.Janeck Vs Ms.Siuzdak.....Hard, Medium, Easy??

### What do you think is the degree of difficulty of this question?

• 18% [3]
• 56% [9]
• 25% [4]
Author Message
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 698

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

CR - Mr.Janeck Vs Ms.Siuzdak.....Hard, Medium, Easy?? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 17:54
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Mr. Janeck: I dont believe Stevensen will win the election for governer. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.

Ms. Siuzdak: You're wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state goverment.

Ms. Siuzdak's response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck's remark to imply which of the following?

A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governer.
B) No candidate with out political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one's ability to run a state goverment fairly.
E) Voters generally over estimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate.

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 891

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 19:54
My choice would be A.

B - is out because its a extreme choice - 'No candidate...'
C - Au contraire. She does not think they are analogus. Its Siuzdak who thinks that way.
D - Very generic - not particularly relevant to the stevenson situation here.
E - Voters psyche is out of scope to some extent. Here we are concerned with what Janet implied.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 391

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore, India
Re: CR - Mr.Janeck Vs Ms.Siuzdak.....Hard, Medium, Easy?? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 05:24
I am picking up E because nowhere it is implied that "Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governer". He is just representing views of the voters and E clearly is opposite to that stated by Ms. Siuzdak. Thus, I feel E is the answer.

A is just a contender I believe.

gmataquaguy wrote:
Mr. Janeck: I dont believe Stevensen will win the election for governer. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.

Ms. Siuzdak: You're wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state goverment.

Ms. Siuzdak's response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck's remark to imply which of the following?

A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governer.
B) No candidate with out political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one's ability to run a state goverment fairly.
E) Voters generally over estimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate.

_________________

Awaiting response,

Thnx & Rgds,
Chandra

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 544 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 08:36
A it is. I'll be with Venksune's explanation.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 544 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 08:51
A clearly. She is giving an explaination to what she understands as "potential disqualification" on grounds of public inexperience.

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 179

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 08:52
A is my choice too. Explanations above seem to quite right.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 184

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Re: CR - Mr.Janeck Vs Ms.Siuzdak.....Hard, Medium, Easy?? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 08:52
I agree with A. Seems quite logical.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 698

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2004, 04:43
The OA is "A". I'm the only person who missed this question.

I posted the OA yesterday but for some reason it didnt show up and therefore i am posting again.

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

13 Aug 2004, 04:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# CR - Mr.Janeck Vs Ms.Siuzdak.....Hard, Medium, Easy??

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.