Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
57%
(01:59)
correct 43%
(02:04)
wrong
based on 14
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Normally experts enter their field with the goal of doing important new investigation and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Thus, when any expert wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other experts conclude that this popularize should no longer be regarded as a real colleague.
The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research experts assumes that
(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
(B) research experts tend not to regard as colleagues those experts whose renown they envy
(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
(D) research experts believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves experts
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Normally experts enter their field with the goal of doing important new investigation and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Thus, when any expert wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other experts conclude that this popularize should no longer be regarded as a real colleague.
The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research experts assumes that
(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
(B) research experts tend not to regard as colleagues those experts whose renown they envy
(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
(D) research experts believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves experts
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.